FTier FBreakout (experimental): a new deck built on C1, 7.5% of entries since C1 (range 6.5–8.6%, 355 entries in 31 events). In 11 past releases, 15 of 18 decks tagged 72 hours in became meta decks (3%+ of entries 3 to 6 weeks after the release).#2 by share
Win rate47.3%Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)45.0–49.7 ·1.7k games
Adjusted for skill46.4%, trend steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)44.4–48.4 · average player
Vs the meta46.9%44.4–49.5 · sets the tier
Since C17.5%6.51–8.56% ·355 entries · 31 events
Pilot rating1525+7 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
7.5%range 6.51–8.56% · 355 entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 13% to 7.5%; low 7.5% (Nov 9), high 13% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
13%
9.3–17.4%
50
Oct 30
12%
9.5–14.9%
99
Oct 31
9.8%
8.2–11.7%
166
Nov 1
9.2%
7.7–10.9%
178
Nov 2
9.5%
8.1–11.1%
219
Nov 3
9.3%
8.0–10.8%
247
Nov 4
9.2%
8.0–10.6%
287
Nov 5
9.0%
7.8–10.3%
292
Nov 6
8.8%
7.7–10.1%
321
Nov 7
8.8%
7.6–10.0%
323
Nov 8
8.0%
7.0–9.2%
337
Nov 9
7.5%
6.5–8.6%
355
Win rate
47.3%range 45.0–49.7% · 1,683 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Adjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 48.4% to 47.3%; low 47.0% (Oct 31), high 48.4% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
48.4%
42.1–54.8%
223
46.6%
Oct 30
47.9%
43.4–52.3%
453
45.8%
Oct 31
47.0%
43.5–50.5%
743
45.3%
Nov 1
47.1%
43.7–50.5%
797
45.2%
Nov 2
47.1%
44.1–50.1%
995
46.1%
Nov 3
47.7%
44.9–50.5%
1,156
46.9%
Nov 4
48.1%
45.5–50.7%
1,381
47.1%
Nov 5
47.9%
45.3–50.4%
1,400
46.9%
Nov 6
47.3%
44.9–49.7%
1,521
46.4%
Nov 7
47.2%
44.7–49.6%
1,525
46.3%
Nov 8
47.2%
44.8–49.5%
1,595
46.3%
Nov 9
47.3%
45.0–49.7%
1,683
46.4%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
Limitless names this deck in several ways, after the Pokémon a list runs. Each version shows its share of the deck, its win rate adjusted for skill and the cards that set it apart.
Version · share of the deckAdjusted for skillSets it apart
Mega Greninja ex Greninja exMost played
62% of this deck's entriesentries221
Adjusted for skill
44.1%
992 games
Win rate 44.1% · 90% range 41.5–46.7% · 992 games
Sets it apart
Same cards as the rest
Greninja ex Mega Greninja ex
38% of this deck's entriesentries134
Adjusted for skill
49.5%
691 games
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 46.4–52.7% · 691 games
Sets it apart
Same cards as the rest
Card usage
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 194 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 26.4% · 90% range 19.0–33.8% · Record 14–54–2 over 70 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 43.7–61.4% · Record 34–25–3 over 62 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 34.5% · 90% range 26.3–42.8% · Record 15–46–4 over 65 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 40.9–59.2% · Record 28–21–1 over 50 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 40.2–61.2% · Record 21–14–1 over 36 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+2.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 32.3% · 90% range 23.5–41.2% · Record 20–49–2 over 71 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.8% · 90% range 31.4–52.2% · Record 12–18–1 over 31 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 32.2% · 90% range 23.0–41.4% · Record 9–35–1 over 45 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.2% · 90% range 35.6–54.9% · Record 21–20–1 over 42 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 41.7–59.4% · Record 26–26–2 over 54 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 36.1–56.3% · Record 15–18–1 over 34 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.8% · 90% range 39.4–58.2% · Record 21–25–1 over 47 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 40.4–61.8% · Record 20–13–1 over 34 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 38.8% · 90% range 27.0–50.7% · Record 5–10 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.6% · 90% range 34.8–58.3% · Record 8–11–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 31.9–56.7% · Record 6–8–2 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 35.2–60.0% · Record 4–9 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 35.1–61.8% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.5% · 90% range 25.8–49.2% · Record 6–10 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 38.0–63.8% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 35.7–60.1% · Record 6–7–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 44.6–70.4% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 36.7–62.6% · Record 4–3–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 43.0–67.8% · Record 7–5–1 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 47.0–70.8% · Record 11–2 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 35.0–61.9% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.7–72.2% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.5% · 90% range 30.5–58.4% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 45.0–70.4% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.9% · 90% range 30.3–57.5% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 36.7–63.1% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.1% · 90% range 28.6–55.6% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.4% · 90% range 33.8–61.1% · Record 0–5 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.4–64.8% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 31.6–60.1% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.8–63.1% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.9% · 90% range 31.4–56.4% · Record 5–6 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 32.6–61.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.6–71.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 33.6–62.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.8–66.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.8–64.7% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 35.0–62.1% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 35.1–62.8% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.2–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.5% · 90% range 28.4–56.5% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.1–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 32.4–59.6% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 40.6–69.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.6–68.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.6–69.1% · Record 3–2–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.4–65.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.6% · 90% range 35.3–61.9% · Record 1–6 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.1–71.8% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 38.8% · 90% range 24.8–52.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.8–65.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.3–67.7% · Record 0–2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.2% · 90% range 29.4–56.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.9–64.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.7–65.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.2–64.0% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.4–64.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 34.1–62.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 34.0% · 90% range 21.2–46.9% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.4–62.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 44.1–69.5% · Record 5–5 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 33.9–62.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.1–66.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.8–66.1% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.8% · 90% range 31.9–59.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.5–67.8% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.3% · 90% range 26.0–52.7% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 35.1–64.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 33.0–60.5% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.2–74.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.7% · 90% range 26.0–53.4% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 35.2–63.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.5–72.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.7% · 90% range 28.0–55.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.8–66.7% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.5% · 90% range 27.5–55.4% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.3–72.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 33.3–59.8% · Record 2–3–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 34.5–61.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.0–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 36.0–63.5% · Record 2–0–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.8% · 90% range 23.8–51.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 32.4–61.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 35.6–62.3% · Record 2–1–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 34.0–61.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.6% · 90% range 34.8–62.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.5–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 35.9–63.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.3–64.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.3–63.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.6% · 90% range 31.6–59.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.4–66.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 37.9–67.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 38.9–67.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 35.9–64.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.0% · 90% range 29.2–56.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.6–62.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.4–65.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.5–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.8–70.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.1–68.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.3% · 90% range 33.2–61.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.0–66.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.7% · 90% range 25.9–53.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.3–64.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 35.3–63.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.0–71.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 34.8–63.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.0–65.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.8% · 90% range 31.3–58.3% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 35.9–63.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.7–64.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.4–70.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.5–76.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.2% · 90% range 30.1–58.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.5–68.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.4–71.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.8–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.3–70.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.8% · 90% range 31.2–60.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.5–65.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 49.1–76.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.1–66.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.0–73.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.6–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 34.5–62.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.7–68.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 31.6–60.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.5–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.9–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.7–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.1–70.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.0–74.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 36.5% · 90% range 22.9–50.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.8% · 90% range 30.5–59.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 31.9–60.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.3–66.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.4% · 90% range 27.5–55.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.1–63.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 36.8–66.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.8–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.0% · 90% range 28.8–57.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.0–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.0–70.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 42.8–71.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.8% · 90% range 27.9–55.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.2–62.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 33.9–62.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.3–65.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.2–64.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 42.9–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.2% · 90% range 27.9–56.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 35.4–63.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.2–67.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.8–73.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 31.1–60.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 33.5–62.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.5–66.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.3–63.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 34.1–62.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.2–64.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 35.3–63.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 36.5–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.1% · 90% range 27.3–54.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 34.0–62.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.7% · 90% range 26.8–54.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.7–68.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.9–76.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 38.6% · 90% range 25.0–52.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.1–66.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 37.9–66.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.1–64.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 39.7–68.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.3–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.4–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.4–63.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.3–67.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 39.5–69.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.7% · 90% range 54.6–80.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.1–65.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.2–66.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 34.2–62.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.2–66.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)