Win rate44.3%Steady (−0.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)40.2–48.5 ·387 games
Adjusted for skill46.2%, trend steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)42.0–50.4 · average player
Vs the meta46.1%41.8–50.5 · sets the tier
Since C11.5%1.19–1.91% ·80 entries · 26 events
Pilot rating1507−14 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
1.5%range 1.19–1.91% · 80 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 4.6% to 1.5%; low 1.5% (Nov 9), high 4.6% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
4.6% (few)
3.0–6.9%
18
Oct 30
4.2%
3.1–5.7%
35
Oct 31
3.3%
2.6–4.2%
56
Nov 1
3.0%
2.3–3.8%
58
Nov 2
2.6%
2.1–3.3%
63
Nov 3
2.3%
1.8–2.9%
65
Nov 4
2.0%
1.6–2.5%
69
Nov 5
1.9%
1.5–2.5%
70
Nov 6
1.7%
1.3–2.2%
72
Nov 7
1.7%
1.3–2.1%
72
Nov 8
1.6%
1.3–2.0%
76
Nov 9
1.5%
1.2–1.9%
80
Win rate
44.3%range 40.2–48.5% · 387 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 47.8% to 44.3%; low 44.1% (Nov 8), high 47.8% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
47.8% (few)
39.5–55.0%
93
49.9%
Oct 30
47.5%
41.5–53.6%
182
50.4%
Oct 31
47.6%
42.7–52.4%
287
49.9%
Nov 1
46.5%
41.8–51.3%
295
48.5%
Nov 2
45.7%
41.2–50.4%
313
47.7%
Nov 3
45.3%
40.7–49.9%
318
47.3%
Nov 4
45.3%
40.9–49.7%
338
47.5%
Nov 5
45.0%
40.7–49.5%
344
47.2%
Nov 6
44.9%
40.6–49.4%
349
47.0%
Nov 7
44.9%
40.6–49.4%
349
47.0%
Nov 8
44.1%
39.9–48.4%
368
46.1%
Nov 9
44.3%
40.2–48.5%
387
46.2%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 91 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 36.0–56.9% · Record 17–21–1 over 39 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 33.3–58.6% · Record 4–4–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 36.3% · 90% range 23.5–49.1% · Record 1–5 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 33.6–57.8% · Record 8–5–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.8% · 90% range 28.5–53.1% · Record 3–9 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.9% · 90% range 30.7–55.2% · Record 5–6 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 32.1–59.9% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.4% · 90% range 28.5–54.3% · Record 2–7 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.6% · 90% range 24.4–50.8% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.9% · 90% range 27.4–54.3% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.1% · 90% range 27.1–53.1% · Record 1–7 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 43.7–65.9% · Record 9–13–1 over 23 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 43.3% · 90% range 31.1–55.4% · Record 6–8 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 33.3–60.5% · Record 4–7 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.3% · 90% range 26.0–52.5% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 37.7–63.8% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.5% · 90% range 28.6–56.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.9–64.5% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.9% · 90% range 26.5–53.3% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.9% · 90% range 29.4–58.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.5% · 90% range 27.2–53.9% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.4–73.8% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.5% · 90% range 28.7–56.2% · Record 2–2–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 43.1–70.2% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 34.0–61.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.9–75.9% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 33.6–62.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.1–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 34.3–63.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 33.3–61.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.5–65.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 31.9–59.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.6% · 90% range 34.4–62.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.2% · 90% range 25.6–52.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.1–72.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 34.2–62.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.5% · 90% range 28.4–56.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 38.9% · 90% range 24.8–53.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.5–67.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.7–76.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.9–77.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.2% · 90% range 23.6–50.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.8% · 90% range 29.8–57.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.1% · 90% range 28.8–57.5% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.7–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 32.5–61.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 34.0–62.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.5–65.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 36.3–66.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 35.3–64.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 35.7–63.6% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.6% · 90% range 26.5–54.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.7–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 30.7–57.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 34.8–63.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.2–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.2–67.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.7–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 35.4–64.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.4–66.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.3–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.2–68.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.5–65.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 40.9–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.9–70.1% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 34.0–63.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.4% · 90% range 27.1–55.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 41.9–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.6–61.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 36.5–66.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.2–65.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.5–67.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 35.8–63.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.9–64.8% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.8–67.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.1–71.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 37.6–66.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.8–66.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 36.8–65.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.7% · 90% range 26.7–54.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.5–62.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.5–71.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.9–64.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.0–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.7% · 90% range 32.2–61.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.9% · 90% range 30.0–57.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 39.5–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.7% · 90% range 28.0–55.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)