Its win rate44.3%Steady (−0.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)40.2–48.5 ·387 games
Top-cut share0.81%0.46–1.45% ·
Window
Games
Since C1
Best decks against Pikachu ex Pawmot (C1)
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
No deck is clearly favored. 3 lean ahead, but each range reaches below 50%.
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Pikachu ex Pawmot (C1), averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Pikachu ex Pawmot (C1) yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
12 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Pikachu ex Pawmot (C1) in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 4.6% to 1.5%; low 1.5% (Nov 9), high 4.6% (Oct 29).Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
4.6% (few)
3.0–6.9%
18
Oct 30
4.2%
3.1–5.7%
35
Oct 31
3.3%
2.6–4.2%
56
Nov 1
3.0%
2.3–3.8%
58
Nov 2
2.6%
2.1–3.3%
63
Nov 3
2.3%
1.8–2.9%
65
Nov 4
2.0%
1.6–2.5%
69
Nov 5
1.9%
1.5–2.5%
70
Nov 6
1.7%
1.3–2.2%
72
Nov 7
1.7%
1.3–2.1%
72
Nov 8
1.6%
1.3–2.0%
76
Nov 9
1.5%
1.2–1.9%
80
Meta share1.5%−14%range
14 entries
0.66× expected (0.35–0.97)
TierDTier Dvs meta 46.1% (41.8–50.5)
Giratina exDragonair
Win rate vs it59.3%, trend steady (−3.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)49–70%range ·16–10
Serena's Choice2 decks · 46 games with · in 69% of their lists
+5.3pp
+5.3pp · 90% range −5.4pp to +16.0pp · 46 games · could be zero
Mars1 deck · 14 games with · in 38% of their lists
+3.4pp
+3.4pp · 90% range −11.6pp to +18.2pp · 14 games · could be zero
Copycat1 deck · 21 games with · in 44% of their lists
+2.7pp
+2.7pp · 90% range −12.3pp to +16.6pp · 21 games · could be zero
Inflatable Boat1 deck · 12 games with · in 24% of their lists
+2.3pp
+2.3pp · 90% range −12.7pp to +17.4pp · 12 games · could be zero
Giant Cape1 deck · 12 games with · in 35% of their lists
+1.4pp
+1.4pp · 90% range −13.4pp to +16.3pp · 12 games · could be zero
Froakie C1 401 deck · 17 games with · in 56% of their lists
+2.4pp
+2.4pp · 90% range −13.6pp to +18.4pp · 17 games · could be zero
Irida1 deck · 13 games with · in 40% of their lists
+0.3pp
+0.3pp · 90% range −14.5pp to +15.6pp · 13 games · could be zero
Soothing Shore1 deck · 25 games with · in 77% of their lists
−0.3pp
−0.3pp · 90% range −15.0pp to +14.9pp · 25 games · could be zero
Wally1 deck · 28 games with · in 83% of their lists
−0.6pp
−0.6pp · 90% range −15.7pp to +13.9pp · 28 games · could be zero
May1 deck · 13 games with · in 49% of their lists
−1.0pp
−1.0pp · 90% range −15.9pp to +13.4pp · 13 games · could be zero
Froakie B1 711 deck · 21 games with · in 46% of their lists
−4.7pp
−4.7pp · 90% range −19.6pp to +11.5pp · 21 games · could be zero
Blue's Provocation1 deck · 27 games with · in 70% of their lists
−8.6pp
−8.6pp · 90% range −22.9pp to +6.6pp · 27 games · could be zero
1.19–1.91% ·
80 entries ·
63 pilots
Share of top cuts0.81%range 0.46–1.45% ·14 entries
Share trend vs the whole 13-day window (falling −14%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 9, 2026.
62.4%
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 49.2–75.6% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–3 · 5 games
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.2–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
60.7%
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 47.5–74.0% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–1 · 5 games
60.8%
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.1–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
59.9%
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.9–72.9% · Record 7–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–1 · 8 games
59.2%
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 46.9–71.5% · Record 9–3 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
9–3 · 12 games
61.1%
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 46.9–75.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
60.1%
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.7–73.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0 · 3 games
59.5%
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 46.1–72.8% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–1 · 5 games
58.6%
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 45.7–71.5% · Record 7–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–2 · 9 games
59.1%
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.7–72.6% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–0 · 4 games
59.4%
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.4–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
59.3%
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.3–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
57.1%
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 44.8–69.3% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–5 · 11 games
56.7%
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 44.6–68.9% · Record 8–6 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
8–6 · 14 games
58.3%
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.5–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
58.6%
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.2–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.8–71.3% · Record 2–2–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–2–1 · 5 games
57.5%
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.6–71.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
57.5%
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.4–71.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
56.9%
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.5–71.2% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–0–1 · 1 games
56.2%
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.2–70.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 42.2–66.4% · Record 5–8–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–8–1 · 14 games
56.1%
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.2–70.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
55.7%
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 42.1–69.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
56.1%
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 41.6–70.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 41.4–66.7% · Record 4–4–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–4–2 · 10 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–67.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0 · 3 games
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.1–68.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
53.1%
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.5–66.7% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–4 · 11 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.0–67.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.3%
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 38.8–67.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.5%
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.4–66.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.4–66.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.1%
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.1–66.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
52.2%
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 37.9–66.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.7–66.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.6–66.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.6–65.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.4%
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.2–65.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.1%
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.0–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 36.9–66.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.4–64.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.4–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.3–64.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.7–64.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 35.4–64.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.