Loading deck…
MetalodonData through Nov 9
Metalodon
63 pilots · 80 entries · hero card Pikachu ex
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
| Data through | Meta share | 90% range | entries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29 | 4.6% (few) | 3.0–6.9% | 18 |
| Oct 30 | 4.2% | 3.1–5.7% | 35 |
| Oct 31 | 3.3% | 2.6–4.2% | 56 |
| Nov 1 | 3.0% | 2.3–3.8% | 58 |
| Nov 2 | 2.6% | 2.1–3.3% | 63 |
| Nov 3 | 2.3% | 1.8–2.9% | 65 |
| Nov 4 | 2.0% | 1.6–2.5% | 69 |
| Nov 5 | 1.9% | 1.5–2.5% | 70 |
| Nov 6 | 1.7% | 1.3–2.2% | 72 |
| Nov 7 | 1.7% | 1.3–2.1% | 72 |
| Nov 8 | 1.6% | 1.3–2.0% | 76 |
| Nov 9 | 1.5% | 1.2–1.9% | 80 |
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
How each card changes the win rate against each of the most common opponents. Colored only when clearly above or below zero.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 91 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Newest first. Records as reported by Limitless (byes count as wins).
Data through Nov 9, 2026 games387 entries80How these numbers work
| Data through | Win rate | 90% range | games | Adjusted for skill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29 | 47.8% (few) | 39.5–55.0% | 93 | 49.9% |
| Oct 30 | 47.5% | 41.5–53.6% | 182 | 50.4% |
| Oct 31 | 47.6% | 42.7–52.4% | 287 | 49.9% |
| Nov 1 | 46.5% | 41.8–51.3% | 295 | 48.5% |
| Nov 2 | 45.7% | 41.2–50.4% | 313 | 47.7% |
| Nov 3 | 45.3% | 40.7–49.9% | 318 | 47.3% |
| Nov 4 | 45.3% | 40.9–49.7% | 338 | 47.5% |
| Nov 5 | 45.0% | 40.7–49.5% | 344 | 47.2% |
| Nov 6 | 44.9% | 40.6–49.4% | 349 | 47.0% |
| Nov 7 | 44.9% | 40.6–49.4% | 349 | 47.0% |
| Nov 8 | 44.1% | 39.9–48.4% | 368 | 46.1% |
| Nov 9 | 44.3% | 40.2–48.5% | 387 | 46.2% |
Pawmi · 2 copies in nearly every list; lists pick:
Pikachu ex · 2 copies in nearly every list; lists pick:
Pawmo · 1 copy in 10% of lists; lists pick:
Zeraora · 1 copy in 8% of lists; lists pick:
1 copyStapleSerena's Choice86% of lists
1 copyStapleCyrus76% of lists
1 copySabrina67% of lists
1 copyOricorio57% of listsAlso in some lists: Kid's Room 22% · Field Blower 16% · Pokémon Center Lady 14% · Nemona 13%
20 cards in this list
Among 5 matchups with enough recent games.
Mega Greninja ex Greninja ex7.5% of field · 20–18Mega Greninja ex Suicune ex2.1% of field · 9–13–186% of lists, range 77.5–91.4%, trend +2.5pp (now vs the whole 13-day window)×1.112% of lists run two copies2nd copy
7.9% of lists, range 3.5–16.7%, trend +2.3pp (now vs the whole 13-day window)×157% of lists, range 44.9–68.5%, trend steady (−2.3pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1.16.3% of lists run two copies2nd copy
9.1% of lists, range 4.4–17.8%, trend steady (−1.7pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
6.6% of lists, range 3.2–13.4%, trend steady (−1.6pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1.967% of lists, range 55.8–76.3%, trend steady (+1.5pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
22% of lists, range 14.3–32.3%, trend steady (+1.5pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
14% of lists, range 8.3–23.5%, trend steady (−1.5pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
9.1% of lists, range 4.8–16.5%, trend steady (+1.2pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
12% of lists, range 7.3–20.5%, trend steady (−1.0pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1.976% of lists, range 65.7–84.4%, trend steady (−1.0pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
5.4% of lists, range 2.3–12.2%, trend steady (−0.6pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
5.7% of lists, range 2.4–12.7%×1
6.9% of lists, range 2.8–15.8%×1
13% of lists, range 7.6–21.8%×1
7.2% of lists, range 3.4–14.6%×1
96% of lists, range 90.0–98.5%×1.660% of lists run two copies2nd copy
99% of lists, range 94.3–99.8%×2
16% of lists, range 9.7–25.8%×19.9% of lists, range 5.4–17.6%×1
100% of lists, range 96.3–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 96.3–100.0%×1.989% of lists run two copies2nd copy
100% of lists, range 96.3–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 96.3–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 96.3–100.0%×2
3.1% of lists, range 0.9–9.7%, trend steady (−0.5pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
3.0% of lists, range 0.9–9.6%, trend steady (−0.6pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1.6
3.0% of lists, range 0.9–9.3%×1
2.7% of lists, range 0.9–8.2%×1
2.3% of lists, range 0.5–9.7%, trend steady (+0.8pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
2.0% of lists, range 0.4–8.6%, trend steady (+0.6pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×2
1.8% of lists, range 0.5–6.7%, trend steady (−0.5pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
1.1% of lists, range 0.2–5.7%×2
1.1% of lists, range 0.2–5.7%×1
1.1% of lists, range 0.2–5.7%×1
1.0% of lists, range 0.2–5.5%×1
0.9% of lists, range 0.2–5.4%×1
0.9% of lists, range 0.1–5.3%×1
0.9% of lists, range 0.1–5.3%×1
0.9% of lists, range 0.1–5.3%×1
0.9% of lists, range 0.1–5.3%×1
0.9% of lists, range 0.1–5.3%×1
0.9% of lists, range 0.1–5.3%×1
