Loading deck…
MetalodonData through Nov 11
Metalodon
42 pilots · 55 entries · hero card Mega Sableye ex
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
| Data through | Meta share | 90% range | entries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30 | 0.13% (few) | 0.0–0.9% | 1 |
| Oct 31 | 0.58% (few) | 0.3–1.2% | 9 |
| Nov 1 | 0.75% (few) | 0.4–1.4% | 13 |
| Nov 2 | 1.3% | 0.9–2.0% | 27 |
| Nov 3 | 1.4% | 1.0–2.1% | 33 |
| Nov 4 | 1.4% | 0.9–1.9% | 38 |
| Nov 5 | 1.3% | 0.9–1.9% | 39 |
| Nov 6 | 1.3% | 0.9–1.8% | 42 |
| Nov 7 | 1.2% | 0.9–1.8% | 42 |
| Nov 8 | 1.2% | 0.9–1.7% | 46 |
| Nov 9 | 1.2% | 0.8–1.7% | 50 |
| Nov 10 | 1.2% | 0.9–1.7% | 55 |
| Nov 11 | 1.2% | 0.8–1.6% | 55 |
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
How each card changes the win rate against each of the most common opponents. Colored only when clearly above or below zero.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 72 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Newest first. Records as reported by Limitless (byes count as wins).
Data through Nov 11, 2026 games302 entries55How these numbers work
| Data through | Win rate | 90% range | games | Adjusted for skill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30 | 62.5% (few) | 40.0–65.0% | 8 | 54.1% |
| Oct 31 | 53.6% (few) | 42.6–64.2% | 55 | 56.8% |
| Nov 1 | 51.8% (few) | 42.8–60.6% | 82 | 53.6% |
| Nov 2 | 51.6% | 45.0–58.0% | 157 | 53.1% |
| Nov 3 | 49.0% | 42.9–55.2% | 177 | 50.4% |
| Nov 4 | 50.7% | 45.1–56.2% | 217 | 51.7% |
| Nov 5 | 50.2% | 44.7–55.6% | 223 | 51.4% |
| Nov 6 | 51.0% | 45.8–56.2% | 246 | 52.5% |
| Nov 7 | 51.0% | 45.8–56.2% | 246 | 52.5% |
| Nov 8 | 50.3% | 45.2–55.4% | 261 | 52.0% |
| Nov 9 | 50.1% | 45.2–55.0% | 281 | 52.4% |
| Nov 10 | 48.5% | 43.8–53.3% | 302 | 51.0% |
| Nov 11 | 48.5% | 43.8–53.3% | 302 | 51.0% |
1 copySabrina88% of lists
1 copyStapleSerena's Choice70% of lists
2 copiesX Speed66% of lists
2 copiesLucky Ice Pop61% of listsAlso in some lists: Pokémon Center Lady 46% · Mega Absol ex 41% · Bombirdier 29% · Repel 28% · Pokémon Communication 16% · May 15% · Hiking Trail 13%
20 cards in this list
Among 4 matchups with enough recent games.
Umbreon Hydreigon (C1/B1)5.4% of field · 16–6–2
Mega Charizard Y ex Entei ex8.9% of field · 16–6
Mega Greninja ex Greninja ex7.6% of field · 13–15
13% of lists, range 3.1–40.6%, trend +2.8pp (now vs the whole 14-day window)×1
93% of lists, range 85.1–97.3%, trend +1.9pp (now vs the whole 14-day window)×1
15% of lists, range 8.3–25.7%, trend steady (−2.4pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×170% of lists, range 55.9–81.1%, trend steady (+2.1pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1.215% of lists run two copies2nd copy
28% of lists, range 16.7–43.9%, trend steady (−1.9pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
6.9% of lists, range 2.9–15.4%, trend steady (−1.6pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
92% of lists, range 82.0–97.0%, trend steady (−1.6pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1.768% of lists run two copies2nd copy
7.6% of lists, range 3.0–18.0%, trend steady (+1.6pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
9.0% of lists, range 3.9–19.5%, trend steady (+1.3pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1.8
5.3% of lists, range 1.2–20.7%, trend steady (+1.3pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
5.3% of lists, range 1.2–20.7%, trend steady (+1.3pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
91% of lists, range 80.9–96.3%, trend steady (−1.1pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×266% of lists, range 51.4–78.2%, trend steady (−1.0pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1.641% of lists run two copies2nd copy88% of lists, range 78.5–93.8%, trend steady (−0.8pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
29% of lists, range 17.6–42.7%×161% of lists, range 44.5–74.6%×1.848% of lists run two copies2nd copy
46% of lists, range 31.2–61.5%×1.2
9.0% of lists, range 4.3–18.1%×1
16% of lists, range 7.4–32.3%×1
100% of lists, range 94.8–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 94.8–100.0%×1
100% of lists, range 94.8–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 94.8–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 94.8–100.0%×2
4.1% of lists, range 1.4–11.6%, trend steady (−1.0pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
3.2% of lists, range 0.7–13.3%, trend steady (+1.1pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
3.2% of lists, range 0.7–13.3%, trend steady (+1.1pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
3.2% of lists, range 0.7–13.3%, trend steady (+1.1pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
2.8% of lists, range 0.7–9.7%, trend steady (−0.7pp, now vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)×1
1.8% of lists, range 0.4–8.2%×1
1.8% of lists, range 0.4–8.2%×1
1.4% of lists, range 0.3–7.7%×2
1.4% of lists, range 0.3–7.7%×1
1.4% of lists, range 0.3–7.7%×1
1.2% of lists, range 0.2–7.3%×1
1.2% of lists, range 0.2–7.3%×1
1.2% of lists, range 0.2–7.3%×1
1.2% of lists, range 0.2–7.3%×1
