Meta share1.2%Steady (+1%, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)0.84–1.67% ·50 entries
Win ratefew games50.1%Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)45.2–55.0 ·281 games
Adjusted for skillfew games52.4%, trend steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)47.5–57.3 · average player
Vs the metafew games52.0%48.3–55.6 · sets the tier
Since C11.2%0.84–1.67% ·50 entries · 19 events
Pilot rating1505−17 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
1.2%range 0.84–1.67% · 50 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 30 – Nov 9: 0.13% to 1.2%; low 0.13% (Oct 30), high 1.4% (Nov 3). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (11 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 30
0.13% (few)
0.0–0.9%
1
Oct 31
0.58% (few)
0.3–1.2%
9
Nov 1
0.75% (few)
0.4–1.4%
13
Nov 2
1.3%
0.9–2.1%
27
Nov 3
1.4%
1.0–2.1%
33
Nov 4
1.4%
0.9–2.0%
38
Nov 5
1.3%
0.9–1.9%
39
Nov 6
1.3%
0.9–1.8%
42
Nov 7
1.2%
0.9–1.8%
42
Nov 8
1.2%
0.9–1.7%
46
Nov 9
1.2%
0.8–1.7%
50
Win rate
50.1%range 45.2–55.0% · 281 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 30 – Nov 9: 62.5% to 50.1%; low 49.0% (Nov 3), high 62.5% (Oct 30). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (11 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 30
62.5% (few)
40.0–65.0%
8
54.1%
Oct 31
53.6% (few)
42.6–64.2%
55
56.8%
Nov 1
51.8% (few)
42.8–60.6%
82
53.6%
Nov 2
51.6%
45.0–58.0%
157
53.1%
Nov 3
49.0%
42.9–55.2%
177
50.4%
Nov 4
50.7%
45.1–56.2%
217
51.7%
Nov 5
50.2%
44.7–55.6%
223
51.4%
Nov 6
51.0%
45.8–56.2%
246
52.5%
Nov 7
51.0%
45.8–56.2%
246
52.5%
Nov 8
50.3%
45.2–55.4%
261
52.0%
Nov 9
50.1%
45.2–55.0%
281
52.4%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 68 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 44.2% · 90% range 33.1–55.2% · Record 8–15–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 46.1–69.2% · Record 14–5–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.8% · 90% range 27.7–51.9% · Record 2–11 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 32.5–58.8% · Record 1–6 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 43.0–69.0% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 40.5–64.7% · Record 7–8 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 33.9–59.9% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.0% · 90% range 34.5–59.6% · Record 4–6 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 42.2–67.5% · Record 8–4 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 33.4–60.3% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 36.7% · 90% range 24.0–49.5% · Record 0–5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.3% · 90% range 27.4–53.3% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 42.1–68.0% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 39.7–64.4% · Record 5–4–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 39.1–66.2% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.6–71.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 38.3–64.4% · Record 5–0–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.7–70.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.4% · 90% range 30.9–57.9% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 40.3–67.6% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.1–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.3–68.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.6–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.6–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.3–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.3–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.0% · 90% range 29.0–57.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.2–65.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.7–73.7% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.8–63.8% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.7–66.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.1–63.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.2% · 90% range 30.6–57.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.8–68.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.5–65.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.6–63.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.0–72.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.6–66.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.0–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.4–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.4–64.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 39.0–66.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.9–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.9–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 35.3–63.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.9–67.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.8–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.6–74.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.3–67.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.0–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.1–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.2–66.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.2–66.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.0–68.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 42.4–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.5–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 41.8–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.8–67.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.2–64.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.8–77.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.5–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.4–64.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.8–68.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 41.4–70.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.5–69.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.4–76.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)