Meta share1.3%Steady (−3%, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)0.93–1.76% ·58 entries
Win ratefew games48.1%Steady (+1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)42.8–53.5 ·298 games
Adjusted for skillfew games48.4%, trend steady (+1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)42.9–53.9 · average player
Vs the metafew games47.7%43.2–52.2 · sets the tier
Since C11.3%0.93–1.76% ·58 entries · 24 events
Pilot rating1516about even vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
1.3%range 0.93–1.76% · 58 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 2.8% to 1.3%; low 1.1% (Nov 2), high 2.8% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
2.8% (few)
1.5–4.0%
11
Oct 30
1.8% (few)
1.0–3.2%
15
Oct 31
1.5%
0.9–2.3%
25
Nov 1
1.4%
0.9–2.1%
27
Nov 2
1.1%
0.7–1.8%
28
Nov 3
1.5%
1.0–2.1%
38
Nov 4
1.5%
1.0–2.1%
45
Nov 5
1.5%
1.0–2.0%
46
Nov 6
1.4%
1.0–1.9%
50
Nov 7
1.4%
1.0–2.0%
51
Nov 8
1.3%
1.0–1.8%
54
Nov 9
1.3%
0.9–1.8%
58
Win rate
48.1%range 42.8–53.5% · 298 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 31.7% to 48.1%; low 31.7% (Oct 29), high 49.8% (Nov 8). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
31.7% (few)
30.0–46.1%
41
31.4%
Oct 30
38.8% (few)
30.0–50.1%
66
39.7%
Oct 31
38.9%
30.6–47.8%
107
39.4%
Nov 1
40.6%
32.7–49.0%
120
41.7%
Nov 2
43.0%
35.3–51.1%
130
42.9%
Nov 3
45.1%
38.5–52.0%
182
45.3%
Nov 4
45.2%
39.1–51.5%
217
45.7%
Nov 5
45.3%
39.3–51.5%
221
45.6%
Nov 6
47.5%
41.7–53.3%
251
48.0%
Nov 7
47.6%
41.9–53.3%
256
47.9%
Nov 8
49.8%
44.4–55.3%
281
50.1%
Nov 9
48.1%
42.8–53.5%
298
48.4%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
Limitless names this deck in several ways, after the Pokémon a list runs. Each version shows its share of the deck, its win rate adjusted for skill and the cards that set it apart.
Version · share of the deckAdjusted for skillSets it apart
Raikou ex PawmotMost played
72% of this deck's entriesentries42
Adjusted for skill
46.2%
205 games
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 40.6–52.0% · 205 games · too few games to call
Worth under 300 games once older ones are discounted, so a rough guide
Sets it apart
No clear difference yet
Pikachu ex Raikou ex
18% of this deck's entriesentries11
Adjusted for skill
45.4%
55 games
Win rate 45.4% · 90% range 32.5–58.9% · 55 games · too few games to call
Worth under 300 games once older ones are discounted, so a rough guide
Sets it apart
Pikachu exC1 43100% of its lists · 41% of the rest
Eviolite26% of its lists · 79% of the rest
Pawmi58% of its lists · 94% of the rest
Pawmot Raikou ex
9.7% of this deck's entriesentries5
Adjusted for skill
62.6%
38 games
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 49.3–74.3% · 38 games · too few games to call
Worth under 300 games once older ones are discounted, so a rough guide
Sets it apart
Too few of its lists to tell
Card usage
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 83 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 38.5–61.8% · Record 10–7–1 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 49.3–73.0% · Record 10–5 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 36.6–58.6% · Record 12–11–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.4% · 90% range 34.8–57.9% · Record 10–10 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.2% · 90% range 28.3–54.2% · Record 4–3–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 32.9–58.9% · Record 7–5–1 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.7% · 90% range 30.9–56.4% · Record 3–5–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 38.4% · 90% range 26.3–50.5% · Record 2–8–1 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.2% · 90% range 28.7–53.6% · Record 3–6 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.5% · 90% range 32.3–58.6% · Record 3–8–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.8% · 90% range 32.5–57.2% · Record 5–6–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 36.6% · 90% range 24.2–49.1% · Record 3–4–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.5% · 90% range 31.1–55.9% · Record 5–7 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.2% · 90% range 26.1–52.2% · Record 0–7 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 46.3–71.4% · Record 5–5 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.0% · 90% range 28.2–55.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.9–64.5% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 36.2–62.3% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.7% · 90% range 27.9–55.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.4% · 90% range 29.6–57.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 35.9–64.0% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 30.8–57.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.9–70.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.8% · 90% range 30.1–59.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.2% · 90% range 27.5–54.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 44.1–71.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.0% · 90% range 26.2–53.7% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.4–68.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.5% · 90% range 31.7–59.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 34.9–64.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.4–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.2% · 90% range 33.1–61.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.4–67.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.6% · 90% range 25.9–53.4% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 35.4–64.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.3–63.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 37.8–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 36.4% · 90% range 23.2–49.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 32.7–61.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 34.4–63.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.7% · 90% range 29.3–58.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.2–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.4% · 90% range 29.0–57.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.5% · 90% range 30.6–58.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 48.8–77.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.2–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 37.9–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.2–76.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.7–65.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.0–69.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 33.8–62.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 29.8–58.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.1% · 90% range 29.3–56.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.3% · 90% range 32.2–60.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.1–61.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 32.0–60.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.3–66.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.7% · 90% range 28.8–56.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.6–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.6–65.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 38.7–69.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.3–64.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 35.8–64.0% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 30.8–59.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.4–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 40.9–69.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.8% · 90% range 26.3–55.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 45.5–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.5–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 36.7–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.3–77.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 47.2–76.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.1% · 90% range 23.9–50.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.0–69.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 43.8–72.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.7–61.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.6–65.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 39.3–68.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 38.9–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 37.9–66.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.0% · 90% range 32.7–61.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 32.1–60.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.2–64.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)