Meta share3.7%Steady (−2%, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)2.83–4.78% ·163 entries
Its win rate48.6%Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)45.4–51.8 ·856 games
Top-cut share4.0%
Window
Games
Since C1
Best decks against Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
2 favored counters (whole range above 50%), 6 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
24 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 2.6% to 3.7%; low 2.6% (Oct 29), high 4.7% (Nov 1).Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
2.6% (few)
1.0–6.5%
10
Oct 30
4.6%
2.8–7.5%
37
Oct 31
4.7%
3.3–6.6%
77
Nov 1
4.7%
3.4–6.5%
88
Nov 2
4.1%
2.9–5.6%
94
Nov 3
3.8%
2.8–5.2%
102
Nov 4
3.5%
2.6–4.8%
114
Nov 5
3.6%
2.7–4.9%
119
Nov 6
3.7%
2.8–4.9%
134
Nov 7
3.7%
2.8–4.8%
135
Nov 8
3.7%
2.8–4.9%
149
Nov 9
3.7%
2.8–4.8%
163
Meta share3.7%Steady
2.61–6.01% ·44 entries1.03× expected (0.75–1.31)
TierDTier Dvs meta 49.3% (45.7–53.0)
Hoopa exMega Absol ex
Win rate vs it67.3%, trend steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)58–77%range ·28–9
Serena's Choice4 decks · 158 games with · in 66% of their lists
+0.6pp
+0.6pp · 90% range −6.8pp to +8.0pp · 158 games · could be zero
Pokémon Center Lady2 decks · 86 games with · in 63% of their lists
+3.7pp
+3.7pp · 90% range −7.4pp to +14.7pp · 86 games · could be zero
May2 decks · 86 games with · in 59% of their lists
+2.2pp
+2.2pp · 90% range −7.8pp to +12.3pp · 86 games · could be zero
Giant Cape4 decks · 106 games with · in 43% of their lists
−0.5pp
−0.5pp · 90% range −8.2pp to +7.1pp · 106 games · could be zero
Inflatable Boat1 deck · 16 games with · in 24% of their lists
+4.5pp
+4.5pp · 90% range −10.3pp to +17.6pp · 16 games · could be zero
X Speed1 deck · 29 games with · in 54% of their lists
+4.6pp
+4.6pp · 90% range −10.6pp to +17.1pp · 29 games · could be zero
Copycat4 decks · 124 games with · in 50% of their lists
−3.5pp
−3.5pp · 90% range −11.1pp to +4.1pp · 124 games · could be zero
Soothing Shore2 decks · 62 games with · in 64% of their lists
−0.2pp
−0.2pp · 90% range −11.3pp to +11.0pp · 62 games · could be zero
Mega Absol ex1 deck · 25 games with · in 47% of their lists
+3.5pp
+3.5pp · 90% range −11.6pp to +16.2pp · 25 games · could be zero
Froakie B1 711 deck · 26 games with · in 46% of their lists
+3.4pp
+3.4pp · 90% range −12.2pp to +17.3pp · 26 games · could be zero
Mega Sableye ex1 deck · 23 games with · in 43% of their lists
+3.1pp
+3.1pp · 90% range −12.5pp to +16.2pp · 23 games · could be zero
Sabrina1 deck · 27 games with · in 42% of their lists
+2.9pp
+2.9pp · 90% range −13.0pp to +18.8pp · 27 games · could be zero
Mars1 deck · 25 games with · in 38% of their lists
+0.9pp
+0.9pp · 90% range −13.2pp to +14.1pp · 25 games · could be zero
Zeraora1 deck · 27 games with · in 37% of their lists
+3.9pp
+3.9pp · 90% range −13.5pp to +20.9pp · 27 games · could be zero
Irida1 deck · 27 games with · in 40% of their lists
−0.8pp
−0.8pp · 90% range −15.1pp to +12.7pp · 27 games · could be zero
Repel1 deck · 13 games with · in 20% of their lists
−0.1pp
−0.1pp · 90% range −15.3pp to +14.7pp · 13 games · could be zero
Charmander1 deck · 81 games with · in 87% of their lists
−1.1pp
−1.1pp · 90% range −16.3pp to +13.9pp · 81 games · could be zero
Eviolite1 deck · 22 games with · in 72% of their lists
−1.6pp
−1.6pp · 90% range −17.0pp to +15.9pp · 22 games · could be zero
Blue's Provocation1 deck · 59 games with · in 70% of their lists
−4.5pp
−4.5pp · 90% range −17.5pp to +8.8pp · 59 games · could be zero
Wally1 deck · 77 games with · in 83% of their lists
−4.7pp
−4.7pp · 90% range −18.2pp to +9.2pp · 77 games · could be zero
Pokémon Communication1 deck · 13 games with · in 21% of their lists
−3.5pp
−3.5pp · 90% range −18.9pp to +11.5pp · 13 games · could be zero
Froakie C1 401 deck · 38 games with · in 56% of their lists
−4.3pp
−4.3pp · 90% range −19.6pp to +10.7pp · 38 games · could be zero
Oricorio1 deck · 18 games with · in 72% of their lists
−3.0pp
−3.0pp · 90% range −19.7pp to +15.1pp · 18 games · could be zero
Poké Ball1 deck · 28 games with · in 60% of their lists
−10.3pp
−10.3pp · 90% range −26.1pp to +5.3pp · 28 games · could be zero
(−2%, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
range 2.83–4.78% ·163 entries ·99 pilots
Share of top cuts4.0%range 2.61–6.01% ·44 entries
Share trend vs the whole 13-day window (steady: −2%, within the noise). Data through Nov 9, 2026.
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 38.9–62.0% · Record 9–13–2 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
9–13–2 · 24 games
62.7%
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 49.2–76.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
58.5%
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 47.0–70.0% · Record 13–5–2 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
13–5–2 · 20 games
57.1%
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 44.0–70.3% · Record 0–5 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–5 · 5 games
56.0%
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 43.0–69.0% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–3 · 7 games
56.7%
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 43.0–70.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
56.6%
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.9–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
55.8%
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 42.4–69.2% · Record 2–1–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1–1 · 4 games
56.4%
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.3–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
55.8%
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.9–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
55.6%
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.7–69.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 41.1–64.2% · Record 13–6 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
13–6 · 19 games
55.2%
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 40.9–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.8%
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.7–68.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.5–68.1% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–2 · 6 games
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.2–68.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
53.9%
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.8–68.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.6%
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.5–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.4%
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.5–67.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
53.5%
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.4–67.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.1–67.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 39.0–63.9% · Record 5–6 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–6 · 11 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.9–65.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.7–65.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.9%
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 37.5–64.3% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–4 · 7 games
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.3–65.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.3%
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.3–65.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.3%
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 36.9–65.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
50.9%
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.9–64.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
50.1%
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.5–63.8% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–4 · 4 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.5–64.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.1–64.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.1%
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.1–64.1% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
50.0%
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.0–64.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.