Win rate54.1%Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)51.6–56.6 ·1.3k games
Adjusted for skill52.9%, trend steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)50.5–55.3 · average player
Vs the meta54.5%52.0–57.1 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.36×1.15–1.57 · vs expected
Pilot rating1526+9 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
5.9%range 5.17–6.83% · 238 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 0.25% to 5.9%; low 0.25% (Oct 29), high 6.0% (Nov 6). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
0.25% (few)
0.0–1.6%
1
Oct 30
2.2% (few)
1.3–3.6%
17
Oct 31
3.3%
2.5–4.4%
52
Nov 1
3.6%
2.8–4.7%
65
Nov 2
4.6%
3.7–5.7%
97
Nov 3
5.1%
4.2–6.1%
121
Nov 4
5.4%
4.6–6.4%
153
Nov 5
5.5%
4.6–6.4%
159
Nov 6
6.0%
5.2–7.0%
193
Nov 7
6.0%
5.2–6.9%
194
Nov 8
6.0%
5.2–6.9%
215
Nov 9
5.9%
5.2–6.8%
238
Win rate
54.1%range 51.6–56.6% · 1,304 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 100.0% to 54.1%; low 53.5% (Nov 8), high 100.0% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
100.0% (few)
40.0–100.0%
1
91.6%
Oct 30
57.3% (few)
48.0–66.1%
95
54.1%
Oct 31
62.0%
56.7–67.1%
284
57.9%
Nov 1
60.4%
55.6–65.0%
360
57.3%
Nov 2
58.0%
54.0–61.8%
534
55.3%
Nov 3
56.5%
53.1–59.9%
690
54.3%
Nov 4
55.1%
52.0–58.1%
854
52.9%
Nov 5
55.1%
52.0–58.1%
886
53.0%
Nov 6
54.3%
51.5–57.0%
1,068
52.6%
Nov 7
54.0%
51.3–56.8%
1,072
52.4%
Nov 8
53.5%
50.9–56.2%
1,181
52.2%
Nov 9
54.1%
51.6–56.6%
1,304
52.9%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 161 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 53.3–69.6% · Record 47–23–3 over 73 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.3% · 90% range 34.7–51.9% · Record 22–38–3 over 63 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 33.9–54.7% · Record 15–22–1 over 38 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.7% · 90% range 36.3–57.1% · Record 13–23–2 over 38 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.3% · 90% range 36.3–54.3% · Record 22–34–1 over 57 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.1% · 90% range 37.1–55.2% · Record 21–29–2 over 52 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 36.7–56.9% · Record 16–23–2 over 41 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.7% · 90% range 33.4–53.9% · Record 16–29–1 over 46 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 45.5% · 90% range 36.0–55.1% · Record 17–25–3 over 45 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.4% · 90% range 31.3–49.6% · Record 13–32–2 over 47 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 39.7–59.1% · Record 21–19–2 over 42 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 43.7–65.0% · Record 15–12–1 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+2.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 41.4–66.7% · Record 4–4–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 43.3–64.6% · Record 15–10–3 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 41.4–63.4% · Record 11–12–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 44.8–66.9% · Record 15–8–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 48.5–73.0% · Record 12–2 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 42.0–66.4% · Record 8–4 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 45.1–71.7% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 39.8–65.9% · Record 2–7 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 34.0–61.4% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 44.1–68.8% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 44.0–71.1% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 48.1–72.8% · Record 4–7 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.8–68.1% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 49.9–75.0% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 49.3–75.7% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 38.3–64.7% · Record 2–2–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 52.0–78.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 35.1–62.3% · Record 3–4–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 46.2–72.4% · Record 3–5 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 38.1–65.0% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 42.2–69.5% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.8% · 90% range 35.0–62.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 42.8–67.7% · Record 4–6–1 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 48.0–74.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.4–65.2% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.7–72.7% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.5–64.0% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.3–67.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.9–77.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 38.7–65.1% · Record 1–5 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.4–65.4% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.5–70.5% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.7–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.6–77.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.2–68.5% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.7–78.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.3–65.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.1–65.7% · Record 0–2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.6–72.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.7–74.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.3–74.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.8% · 90% range 52.5–79.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.8–64.7% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 44.4–71.1% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.6–76.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.6–65.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 40.0–67.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.8–70.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.2–71.1% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.9–64.2% · Record 2–6 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.1–64.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.7–69.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.2–70.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.3–72.8% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.7–71.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.4–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.8–71.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.9–66.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 34.2–63.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.9–70.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 69.9% · 90% range 57.3–82.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.3–68.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.8–71.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.0–77.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 32.3–59.6% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.0–74.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.1–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.2–78.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.4–74.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.1–65.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.2–69.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 40.1–67.1% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.2–66.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 31.6–60.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.0–68.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.4–64.4% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.7–68.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.2–69.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.8–67.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 42.4–71.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.0–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.2–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.8–70.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.8–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.9–71.2% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.0–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.3–68.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.4–68.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.1–74.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.6–76.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.8–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.3–71.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.1–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.6–69.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.4–67.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.7–68.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.4–68.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.7–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.2–66.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.7–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.9–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.5–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.9–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.8–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.4–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.1–73.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.9–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 44.8–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.0–68.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.6–67.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.1–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.0–71.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.6–74.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 49.0–75.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.1–70.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.6–75.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.2–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.4–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.3–72.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.4–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 43.9–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.5–71.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 54.8–80.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 48.8–76.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.3–71.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.9–74.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 37.6–66.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.5–76.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.1–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.9% · 90% range 52.5–79.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 43.9–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.2–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.5–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.4–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.0–67.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 40.3–69.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.0–67.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 69.8% · 90% range 56.8–82.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.3% · 90% range 53.1–79.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.3–69.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.4–70.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.4–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.1–70.1% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.1–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)