Win rate57.0%Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)54.0–59.9 ·940 games
Adjusted for skill55.6%, trend steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)52.8–58.3 · average player
Vs the meta56.2%53.5–59.0 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.43×1.19–1.68 · vs expected
Pilot rating1527+10 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
4.4%range 3.66–5.22% · 166 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 0.77% to 4.4%; low 0.73% (Oct 30), high 4.4% (Nov 9). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
0.77% (few)
0.2–2.7%
3
Oct 30
0.73% (few)
0.3–1.8%
6
Oct 31
1.0% (few)
0.6–1.8%
17
Nov 1
1.5%
1.0–2.4%
27
Nov 2
2.1%
1.5–3.0%
44
Nov 3
3.2%
2.5–4.1%
72
Nov 4
3.7%
2.9–4.6%
98
Nov 5
4.0%
3.2–4.9%
108
Nov 6
4.1%
3.4–5.0%
127
Nov 7
4.2%
3.4–5.1%
129
Nov 8
4.3%
3.5–5.1%
146
Nov 9
4.4%
3.7–5.2%
166
Win rate
57.0%range 54.0–59.9% · 940 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 28.4% to 57.0%; low 28.4% (Oct 29), high 63.7% (Nov 1). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
28.4% (few)
20.0–61.9%
7
34.6%
Oct 30
51.9% (few)
35.4–68.0%
28
57.3%
Oct 31
63.1% (few)
53.6–71.6%
93
62.7%
Nov 1
63.7%
56.5–70.3%
158
60.4%
Nov 2
60.9%
55.3–66.1%
267
56.5%
Nov 3
57.0%
52.5–61.4%
413
54.2%
Nov 4
56.1%
52.3–59.9%
558
54.4%
Nov 5
56.8%
53.1–60.4%
612
55.3%
Nov 6
56.6%
53.2–59.9%
718
55.1%
Nov 7
56.8%
53.4–60.1%
730
55.4%
Nov 8
56.6%
53.5–59.7%
836
55.2%
Nov 9
57.0%
54.0–59.9%
940
55.6%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 135 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 48.1–65.3% · Record 38–22–3 over 63 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 52.1–71.6% · Record 27–11–2 over 40 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−2.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 37.6–57.3% · Record 14–23–2 over 39 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.3% · 90% range 57.4–77.1% · Record 26–5–2 over 33 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 46.2–66.6% · Record 28–18–1 over 47 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 41.4–62.2% · Record 16–14–3 over 33 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 53.4–73.7% · Record 22–6–2 over 30 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 35.1% · 90% range 26.4–43.8% · Record 16–32–2 over 50 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.5% · 90% range 25.8–49.1% · Record 5–12 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 43.8–68.3% · Record 6–6 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 47.6–71.9% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.9–76.5% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 48.3–70.0% · Record 18–5–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.8–71.7% · Record 3–4–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 48.1–72.3% · Record 11–2 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.0% · 90% range 28.5–53.4% · Record 4–7 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 44.3–71.2% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.0% · 90% range 53.2–78.7% · Record 6–0 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.4–66.8% · Record 0–6 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 38.6–64.6% · Record 2–7 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.6–69.9% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.3–74.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 70.1% · 90% range 57.5–82.8% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.1–71.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.7–74.2% · Record 6–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.3–73.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.5% · 90% range 26.8–54.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 53.3–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.5–72.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 47.0–74.3% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.6–64.0% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 35.4–62.4% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 38.0–64.4% · Record 5–2–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.4% · 90% range 29.0–55.9% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.8–72.0% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.0–69.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.3–68.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.1–64.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 37.3–64.2% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.3–72.3% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 48.2–73.8% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.3–68.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.5–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 39.8–68.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 69.3% · 90% range 55.6–82.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.3% · 90% range 50.3–76.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.2–74.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.6–70.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 46.0–73.0% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.2% · 90% range 52.8–79.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.3–72.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.1–74.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 73.2% · 90% range 61.1–85.4% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 44.9–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.4% · 90% range 29.9–56.9% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.6–70.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.6–66.9% · Record 0–2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.9–74.2% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.9–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.8% · 90% range 32.0–59.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.0–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 38.1–65.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.7–75.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.5–70.1% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.9% · 90% range 52.7–79.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.9–68.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 41.7–73.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 53.3–80.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.2–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.1% · 90% range 28.3–55.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.5–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 34.2–61.6% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.2–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.3–68.2% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.6–67.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.4–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 48.6–76.8% · Record 1–1–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.4–72.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.5% · 90% range 31.6–59.3% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.7–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.1–75.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.2–71.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.7–66.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.7–66.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.7–71.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.3% · 90% range 49.7–76.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.2–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 43.8–72.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 68.8% · 90% range 55.6–82.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.8% · 90% range 51.2–78.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.2–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.6% · 90% range 30.9–58.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 49.0–76.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 32.9–60.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.8–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.8–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 35.8–64.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.0–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.4% · 90% range 52.9–79.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.1–75.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.0–68.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.5–66.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.8–71.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.2% · 90% range 27.4–55.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.6% · 90% range 53.2–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.6–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.2–78.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 49.9–77.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.3–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.2–74.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.5–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.3–77.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.4–72.0% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.9–76.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 69.7% · 90% range 56.8–82.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 51.2–79.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.9–71.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 33.8–62.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 50.0–77.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.7–77.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.6% · 90% range 24.0–51.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.5–76.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.8–76.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.7–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 68.6% · 90% range 55.4–81.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.8–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.7% · 90% range 50.8–78.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 70.8% · 90% range 57.9–83.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.0–76.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 40.9–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)