Its win rate56.4%Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)53.7–59.1 ·1.0k games
Top-cut share6.6%5.29–8.14% ·
Window
Games
Since C1
Best decks against Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
2 favored counters (whole range above 50%), 2 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
Top 24 of 31 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 11: 0.77% to 4.3%; low 0.73% (Oct 30), high 4.4% (Nov 9).Show data (14 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
0.77% (few)
0.2–2.6%
3
Oct 30
0.73% (few)
0.3–1.8%
6
Oct 31
1.0% (few)
0.6–1.8%
17
Nov 1
1.5%
1.0–2.3%
27
Nov 2
2.1%
1.5–2.9%
44
Nov 3
3.2%
2.5–4.1%
72
Nov 4
3.7%
3.0–4.6%
98
Nov 5
4.0%
3.2–4.9%
108
Nov 6
4.1%
3.4–5.0%
127
Nov 7
4.2%
3.5–5.0%
129
Nov 8
4.3%
3.6–5.1%
146
Nov 9
4.4%
3.7–5.2%
166
Nov 10
4.4%
3.7–5.2%
180
Nov 11
4.3%
3.7–5.1%
184
Meta share4.3%
70 entries
1.46× expected (1.22–1.69)
TierSTier Svs meta 56.1% (53.4–58.7)
Vespiquen exShuckle ex
Win rate vs it64.8%, trend steady (+1.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)56–73%range ·34–17–2
Serena's Choice6 decks · 237 games with · in 59% of their lists
+6.9pp
+6.9pp · 90% range −0.2pp to +14.1pp · 237 games · could be zero
Cyrus3 decks · 100 games with · in 74% of their lists
+3.2pp
+3.2pp · 90% range −5.4pp to +11.9pp · 100 games · could be zero
Mars3 decks · 120 games with · in 58% of their lists
+2.7pp
+2.7pp · 90% range −5.7pp to +11.1pp · 120 games · could be zero
Sabrina3 decks · 57 games with · in 23% of their lists
+3.1pp
+3.1pp · 90% range −5.7pp to +12.0pp · 57 games · could be zero
Copycat4 decks · 147 games with · in 48% of their lists
+0.5pp
+0.5pp · 90% range −6.5pp to +7.4pp · 147 games · could be zero
Giant Cape4 decks · 113 games with · in 38% of their lists
+0.7pp
+0.7pp · 90% range −6.5pp to +7.9pp · 113 games · could be zero
May2 decks · 109 games with · in 64% of their lists
+4.0pp
+4.0pp · 90% range −6.6pp to +14.5pp · 109 games · could be zero
Lucky Ice Pop2 decks · 35 games with · in 37% of their lists
+4.0pp
+4.0pp · 90% range −6.9pp to +14.9pp · 35 games · could be zero
Pokémon Center Lady4 decks · 126 games with · in 51% of their lists
−1.5pp
−1.5pp · 90% range −9.3pp to +6.2pp · 126 games · could be zero
Froakie B1 711 deck · 47 games with · in 41% of their lists
+4.8pp
+4.8pp · 90% range −9.3pp to +19.1pp · 47 games · could be zero
Field Blower2 decks · 47 games with · in 66% of their lists
+0.7pp
+0.7pp · 90% range −9.8pp to +11.2pp · 47 games · could be zero
Irida1 deck · 34 games with · in 34% of their lists
+2.7pp
+2.7pp · 90% range −10.2pp to +16.1pp · 34 games · could be zero
Mega Sableye ex1 deck · 22 games with · in 48% of their lists
+1.9pp
+1.9pp · 90% range −11.0pp to +17.6pp · 22 games · could be zero
Repel1 deck · 20 games with · in 25% of their lists
+2.4pp
+2.4pp · 90% range −11.9pp to +17.0pp · 20 games · could be zero
Mega Absol ex1 deck · 19 games with · in 42% of their lists
+0.4pp
+0.4pp · 90% range −11.9pp to +15.8pp · 19 games · could be zero
Inflatable Boat1 deck · 16 games with · in 20% of their lists
+1.5pp
+1.5pp · 90% range −12.1pp to +15.8pp · 16 games · could be zero
Poké Ball1 deck · 26 games with · in 59% of their lists
+0.4pp
+0.4pp · 90% range −12.2pp to +16.1pp · 26 games · could be zero
X Speed1 deck · 26 games with · in 58% of their lists
+0.2pp
+0.2pp · 90% range −12.2pp to +15.5pp · 26 games · could be zero
Eviolite2 decks · 64 games with · in 37% of their lists
+1.2pp
+1.2pp · 90% range −12.9pp to +15.3pp · 64 games · could be zero
Protective Poncho1 deck · 21 games with · in 42% of their lists
+1.7pp
+1.7pp · 90% range −13.8pp to +15.2pp · 21 games · could be zero
Flutter Mane1 deck · 30 games with · in 82% of their lists
−3.1pp
−3.1pp · 90% range −14.0pp to +11.4pp · 30 games · could be zero
Red Card1 deck · 17 games with · in 16% of their lists
−0.6pp
−0.6pp · 90% range −14.1pp to +14.5pp · 17 games · could be zero
Soothing Shore2 decks · 103 games with · in 65% of their lists
−4.6pp
−4.6pp · 90% range −14.6pp to +5.5pp · 103 games · could be zero
Zeraora1 deck · 19 games with · in 29% of their lists
+2.0pp
+2.0pp · 90% range −15.6pp to +16.5pp · 19 games · could be zero
+8%
range 3.68–5.12% ·184 entries ·121 pilots
Share of top cuts6.6%range 5.29–8.14% ·70 entries
Share trend vs the whole 14-day window (rising +8%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 11, 2026.
60.2%
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.7–73.6% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
58.3%
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 45.7–70.9% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–4 · 11 games
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.0–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
57.6%
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.0–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
56.7%
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 43.2–70.3% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–0 · 5 games
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.7–68.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0 · 3 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 40.4–66.0% · Record 7–2–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–2–1 · 10 games
53.9%
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 40.2–67.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–67.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 38.3–65.4% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1–1 · 2 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.7–65.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0 · 3 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.6–65.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.4–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.9%
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 37.2–64.5% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–1 · 4 games
50.8%
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.9–64.7% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–2 · 5 games
51.6%
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 36.6–66.7% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0 · 3 games
50.0%
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.3–63.7% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.