Its win rate48.9%Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)46.7–51.1 ·1.4k games
Top-cut share4.5%3.47–5.77% ·62 entries
Window
Games
Since C1
Best decks against Umbreon Hydreigon (C1/B1)
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
6 favored counters (whole range above 50%), 5 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Umbreon Hydreigon (C1/B1), averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Umbreon Hydreigon (C1/B1) yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
Top 24 of 29 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Umbreon Hydreigon (C1/B1) in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 11: 2.3% to 5.4%; low 2.3% (Oct 29), high 8.7% (Oct 31).Show data (14 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
2.3% (few)
1.2–4.5%
9
Oct 30
4.9%
3.5–6.7%
39
Oct 31
8.7%
7.4–10.3%
139
Nov 1
8.7%
7.4–10.1%
158
Nov 2
8.5%
7.3–9.8%
188
Nov 3
7.7%
6.7–8.9%
201
Nov 4
6.9%
6.0–7.9%
218
Nov 5
6.7%
5.9–7.7%
221
Nov 6
6.0%
5.2–6.9%
228
Nov 7
5.9%
5.1–6.8%
229
Nov 8
5.9%
5.1–6.7%
249
Nov 9
5.6%
4.9–6.4%
265
Nov 10
5.5%
4.8–6.3%
281
Nov 11
5.4%
4.7–6.2%
285
Meta share5.4%
0.89× expected (0.72–1.06)
TierDTier Dvs meta 48.5% (45.9–51.1)
Vespiquen exShuckle ex
Win rate vs it66.8%, trend steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 14-day window, within the noise)57–77%range ·19–8–1
Serena's Choice6 decks · 248 games with · in 60% of their lists
+5.4pp
+5.4pp · 90% range −1.3pp to +12.2pp · 248 games · could be zero
Sabrina2 decks · 48 games with · in 45% of their lists
+7.2pp
+7.2pp · 90% range −4.0pp to +18.4pp · 48 games · could be zero
Repel2 decks · 34 games with · in 32% of their lists
+5.9pp
+5.9pp · 90% range −5.2pp to +17.0pp · 34 games · could be zero
Giant Cape5 decks · 245 games with · in 40% of their lists
+1.2pp
+1.2pp · 90% range −5.6pp to +8.0pp · 245 games · could be zero
Mars3 decks · 143 games with · in 57% of their lists
+0.6pp
+0.6pp · 90% range −7.0pp to +8.1pp · 143 games · could be zero
Pokémon Communication2 decks · 41 games with · in 24% of their lists
+1.1pp
+1.1pp · 90% range −9.7pp to +12.0pp · 41 games · could be zero
Charmander A2b 81 deck · 11 games with · in 5% of their lists
+5.5pp
+5.5pp · 90% range −9.8pp to +20.2pp · 11 games · could be zero
Eviolite3 decks · 81 games with · in 31% of their lists
−0.3pp
−0.3pp · 90% range −10.1pp to +9.5pp · 81 games · could be zero
Copycat5 decks · 250 games with · in 49% of their lists
−4.0pp
−4.0pp · 90% range −10.2pp to +2.3pp · 250 games · could be zero
May2 decks · 167 games with · in 63% of their lists
−0.8pp
−0.8pp · 90% range −10.3pp to +8.6pp · 167 games · could be zero
Field Blower4 decks · 142 games with · in 41% of their lists
−2.4pp
−2.4pp · 90% range −10.4pp to +5.7pp · 142 games · could be zero
Inflatable Boat2 decks · 66 games with · in 34% of their lists
−0.8pp
−0.8pp · 90% range −11.1pp to +9.4pp · 66 games · could be zero
Froakie B1 712 decks · 62 games with · in 41% of their lists
−0.3pp
−0.3pp · 90% range −11.3pp to +10.7pp · 62 games · could be zero
Soothing Shore3 decks · 158 games with · in 69% of their lists
−2.5pp
−2.5pp · 90% range −11.3pp to +6.3pp · 158 games · could be zero
Wally1 deck · 134 games with · in 83% of their lists
+0.8pp
+0.8pp · 90% range −12.0pp to +13.7pp · 134 games · could be zero
Pokémon Center Lady4 decks · 206 games with · in 50% of their lists
−3.7pp
−3.7pp · 90% range −12.0pp to +4.6pp · 206 games · could be zero
Zeraora1 deck · 20 games with · in 29% of their lists
+4.5pp
+4.5pp · 90% range −13.6pp to +22.1pp · 20 games · could be zero
Rainbow Cave1 deck · 147 games with · in 91% of their lists
−0.4pp
−0.4pp · 90% range −14.4pp to +14.0pp · 147 games · could be zero
Froakie C1 402 decks · 109 games with · in 60% of their lists
−3.3pp
−3.3pp · 90% range −14.4pp to +7.8pp · 109 games · could be zero
Dratini1 deck · 53 games with · in 69% of their lists
+0.6pp
+0.6pp · 90% range −15.2pp to +16.4pp · 53 games · could be zero
Blue's Provocation1 deck · 110 games with · in 74% of their lists
−4.2pp
−4.2pp · 90% range −16.1pp to +8.3pp · 110 games · could be zero
Irida1 deck · 48 games with · in 34% of their lists
−3.7pp
−3.7pp · 90% range −16.4pp to +8.7pp · 48 games · could be zero
Charmander B2b 71 deck · 139 games with · in 88% of their lists
−4.0pp
−4.0pp · 90% range −17.7pp to +10.6pp · 139 games · could be zero
Electrike B2b 261 deck · 22 games with · in 40% of their lists
−2.9pp
−2.9pp · 90% range −17.8pp to +13.8pp · 22 games · could be zero
−7%
range 4.75–6.20% ·285 entries ·203 pilots
Share of top cuts4.5%range 3.47–5.77% ·62 entries
Share trend vs the whole 14-day window (falling −7%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 11, 2026.
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 47.7–60.8% · Record 72–56–1 over 129 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Mostly these games.
72–56–1 · 129 games
57.5%
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 46.5–68.6% · Record 16–6–2 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
16–6–2 · 24 games
54.4%
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 44.3–64.5% · Record 23–16–1 over 40 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
23–16–1 · 40 games
50.8%
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 39.7–61.9% · Record 11–14 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
11–14 · 25 games
61.2%
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.9–74.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
58.2%
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 46.5–70.0% · Record 10–4–1 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
10–4–1 · 15 games
59.5%
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 46.2–72.9% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–3 · 4 games
58.4%
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.7–72.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
58.4%
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.6–72.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
58.1%
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.4–71.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
57.8%
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.8–71.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
57.5%
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.6–71.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
56.0%
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.3–69.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
54.6%
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 42.1–67.1% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–5 · 9 games
55.8%
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 42.0–69.6% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–2 · 5 games
55.9%
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.8–69.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.5–69.4% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–1 · 5 games
54.9%
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.0–68.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
54.6%
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.8–68.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.2–68.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.7%
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.8–67.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
53.8%
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.8–67.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.8–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
53.4%
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.3–67.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.3–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.4%
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.1–67.8% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.9–66.5% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–2 · 4 games
53.4%
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 38.9–67.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
53.3%
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 38.7–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 38.7–62.2% · Record 9–7 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
9–7 · 16 games
52.5%
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.6–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.1%
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.5–65.7% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–1 · 6 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.3–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.6–66.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.5%
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 37.6–63.4% · Record 5–3 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–3 · 8 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.5–66.5% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–4 · 4 games
51.6%
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.4–65.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.0%
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.3–64.6% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
50.8%
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 37.3–64.3% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–0 · 4 games
50.8%
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.6–65.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.6–63.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.6–64.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
50.1%
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.6–63.7% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–3 · 4 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.4–64.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
50.1%
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.1–64.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.1%
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.0–64.3% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–0–1 · 1 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.0–64.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.9–64.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.