Win ratefew games52.3%Steady (−0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)45.8–58.6 ·162 games
Adjusted for skillfew games54.6%, trend steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)47.9–61.2 · average player
Vs the metafew games49.0%44.5–53.4 · sets the tier
Since C10.53%0.36–0.76% ·29 entries · 14 events
Pilot rating1502−17 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.53%range 0.36–0.76% · 29 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 0.51% to 0.53%; low 0.51% (Oct 29), high 1.4% (Oct 31). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
0.51% (few)
0.2–1.5%
2
Oct 30
1.1% (few)
0.7–1.9%
9
Oct 31
1.4%
1.0–1.9%
22
Nov 1
1.2%
0.9–1.7%
23
Nov 2
1.1%
0.8–1.5%
25
Nov 3
0.90%
0.6–1.3%
25
Nov 4
0.76%
0.5–1.1%
26
Nov 5
0.77%
0.5–1.1%
27
Nov 6
0.69%
0.5–1.0%
28
Nov 7
0.68%
0.5–1.0%
28
Nov 8
0.58%
0.4–0.8%
28
Nov 9
0.53%
0.4–0.8%
29
Win rate
52.3%range 45.8–58.6% · 162 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 68.8% to 52.3%; low 51.4% (Nov 1), high 68.8% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
68.8% (few)
48.2–83.9%
16
87.7%
Oct 30
55.8% (few)
45.2–66.0%
59
59.3%
Oct 31
51.9%
44.5–59.2%
123
54.4%
Nov 1
51.4%
44.2–58.6%
128
53.9%
Nov 2
53.4%
46.6–60.1%
146
56.3%
Nov 3
53.4%
46.6–60.1%
146
56.3%
Nov 4
53.4%
46.6–60.0%
148
56.2%
Nov 5
53.6%
47.0–60.0%
155
56.0%
Nov 6
53.2%
46.6–59.6%
156
55.6%
Nov 7
53.2%
46.6–59.6%
156
55.6%
Nov 8
53.2%
46.6–59.6%
156
55.6%
Nov 9
52.3%
45.8–58.6%
162
54.6%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 58 opponents have few recent games so far, so every row is hatched.
Recent top-8 lists
Newest first. Records as reported by Limitless (byes count as wins).
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 39.9–63.4% · Record 10–7 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 37.4–63.3% · Record 3–4–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 31.9–58.2% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 38.6–62.1% · Record 9–7 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.1% · 90% range 28.2–55.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 34.4–61.4% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 39.0–63.9% · Record 5–6 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 40.0–66.3% · Record 5–2–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.2% · 90% range 31.3–57.2% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.3% · 90% range 29.5–57.1% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.1% · 90% range 32.8–59.4% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.2% · 90% range 31.1–59.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 35.4% · 90% range 22.1–48.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.1% · 90% range 23.5–50.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 41.4–67.2% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 32.9–60.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 40.1–67.4% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.1–66.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.9% · 90% range 30.1–57.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.6–68.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.8–61.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 30.3–58.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.6–66.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.8–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.7% · 90% range 32.7–60.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.4–65.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.5–68.5% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.2–65.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.2–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 34.0–62.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.3% · 90% range 32.3–60.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.3–63.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.1% · 90% range 31.7–60.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.8% · 90% range 29.0–56.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.2–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.2–76.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 36.7–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.9–65.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 35.3–64.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 35.0–62.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.7–73.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 34.6–63.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.4–75.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.5–69.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.3–71.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 37.2–67.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.9–67.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.0–66.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.5–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.1–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 31.1–58.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.2–72.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.6% · 90% range 30.7–58.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.8–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.9–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.8–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 44.6–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.3–66.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)