Win rate57.6%Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)54.0–61.2 ·641 games
Adjusted for skill54.9%, trend steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)51.6–58.1 · average player
Vs the meta53.9%50.2–57.5 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.57×1.29–1.86 · vs expected
Pilot rating1540+20 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
2.8%range 2.15–3.73% · 103 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 0.75% to 2.8%; low 0.46% (Oct 30), high 2.8% (Nov 9). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
0.75% (few)
0.2–3.4%
3
Oct 30
0.46% (few)
0.1–1.8%
4
Oct 31
1.3%
0.7–2.3%
20
Nov 1
1.2%
0.7–2.2%
22
Nov 2
1.3%
0.7–2.2%
28
Nov 3
1.4%
0.8–2.2%
34
Nov 4
1.8%
1.2–2.6%
49
Nov 5
1.8%
1.2–2.7%
52
Nov 6
2.2%
1.6–3.1%
69
Nov 7
2.3%
1.7–3.2%
72
Nov 8
2.7%
2.0–3.6%
89
Nov 9
2.8%
2.2–3.7%
103
Win rate
57.6%range 54.0–61.2% · 641 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 31.1% to 57.6%; low 31.1% (Oct 29), high 59.9% (Nov 7). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
31.1% (few)
30.0–54.2%
16
31.5%
Oct 30
53.7% (few)
37.3–69.3%
30
55.3%
Oct 31
58.3%
50.1–66.0%
129
58.6%
Nov 1
58.4%
50.7–65.8%
144
58.2%
Nov 2
59.5%
52.6–66.1%
181
57.8%
Nov 3
59.3%
53.0–65.3%
218
57.1%
Nov 4
59.2%
54.1–64.2%
322
56.8%
Nov 5
58.2%
53.2–63.1%
340
55.5%
Nov 6
59.4%
55.0–63.6%
451
56.5%
Nov 7
59.9%
55.7–64.1%
469
57.0%
Nov 8
57.7%
53.7–61.5%
560
54.5%
Nov 9
57.6%
54.0–61.2%
641
54.9%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 120 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 45.0–64.2% · Record 29–26–3 over 58 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 38.8–59.8% · Record 14–21–1 over 36 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 43.1–63.3% · Record 23–16–2 over 41 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 46.5–66.9% · Record 18–11–5 over 34 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 37.8–58.6% · Record 14–16–3 over 33 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 34.6–57.4% · Record 11–10–1 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 50.7–71.9% · Record 21–5–2 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 35.2–56.7% · Record 10–16–1 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.3% · 90% range 27.3–51.3% · Record 3–14 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 42.2–64.1% · Record 15–9–1 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 38.6–60.9% · Record 13–11–1 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 45.2–70.4% · Record 5–3–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 46.0–69.6% · Record 12–4 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 45.0–70.6% · Record 5–3 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–67.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 41.7–67.3% · Record 7–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 41.4–67.7% · Record 8–3–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 40.4–65.5% · Record 6–4 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.5–68.1% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 40.9–66.0% · Record 8–4 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 46.2–72.1% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.7–71.9% · Record 5–2–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.7% · 90% range 30.9–58.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.5–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.8–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.9–77.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.9–70.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.1–72.5% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.6–65.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.5–77.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.5–60.7% · Record 1–3–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.3–76.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.3–71.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 33.9–62.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 47.0–73.8% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.8–68.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.9–67.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 35.4–62.9% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.2–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 51.3–77.6% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.8–69.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 39.9–68.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 52.7–79.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.1–68.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.1–72.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.8–73.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.7–71.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 46.1–73.1% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.9–71.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 33.3–62.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 45.0–71.8% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.9% · 90% range 50.3–77.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.7–69.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.3–71.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.6–67.3% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.5–70.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.6–70.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.6–76.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.1–65.0% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 40.8–69.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.3–68.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.0–70.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 35.6–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.0–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.3% · 90% range 33.4–61.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 40.3–71.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 47.9–76.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 31.4–60.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.7–66.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.5–67.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–68.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 39.9–69.3% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.0–74.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.6–66.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.4–70.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.9–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.1–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 43.8–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.3–70.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.0–70.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 48.9–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.6–74.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.7–65.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.5–69.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.0–64.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 35.0–63.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.1–72.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.7–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 72.2% · 90% range 59.4–85.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.0% · 90% range 53.8–80.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.6–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.2–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.3–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 48.7–77.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.9–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.0–65.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 47.8–76.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.4% · 90% range 33.1–61.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.5–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.3–70.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 41.9–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.8–74.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.5–77.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.0–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.2% · 90% range 52.6–79.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.2–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.1–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.7–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.0–77.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.5–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.0–69.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.8–69.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.2–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.1–71.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.7–67.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 70.4% · 90% range 57.4–83.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.5–70.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)