Win rate54.9%Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)51.3–58.4 ·530 games
Adjusted for skill53.0%, trend steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)49.4–56.6 · average player
Vs the meta55.0%50.9–59.1 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.34×1.02–1.65 · vs expected
Pilot rating1531+14 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
2.6%range 2.08–3.19% · 90 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 30 – Nov 9: 0.26% to 2.6%; low 0.26% (Oct 30), high 2.6% (Nov 9). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (11 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 30
0.26% (few)
0.1–1.0%
2
Oct 31
0.83% (few)
0.5–1.5%
13
Nov 1
0.78% (few)
0.4–1.4%
14
Nov 2
0.67% (few)
0.4–1.2%
15
Nov 3
0.97%
0.6–1.5%
23
Nov 4
1.6%
1.2–2.2%
42
Nov 5
1.6%
1.2–2.2%
43
Nov 6
2.1%
1.6–2.7%
60
Nov 7
2.1%
1.6–2.7%
61
Nov 8
2.4%
1.9–3.1%
77
Nov 9
2.6%
2.1–3.2%
90
Win rate
54.9%range 51.3–58.4% · 530 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 30 – Nov 9: 72.2% to 54.9%; low 51.9% (Nov 1), high 72.2% (Oct 30). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (11 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 30
72.2% (few)
52.9–80.0%
18
69.7%
Oct 31
52.7% (few)
42.9–62.3%
69
49.8%
Nov 1
51.9% (few)
42.4–61.2%
74
49.4%
Nov 2
54.7% (few)
45.8–63.3%
85
50.7%
Nov 3
57.9%
51.0–64.6%
141
54.8%
Nov 4
56.7%
51.6–61.7%
254
55.2%
Nov 5
56.4%
51.3–61.4%
257
55.0%
Nov 6
54.6%
50.2–58.9%
353
53.5%
Nov 7
54.2%
49.8–58.5%
359
53.3%
Nov 8
55.1%
51.2–58.9%
448
53.8%
Nov 9
54.9%
51.3–58.4%
530
53.0%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 97 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 43.4% · 90% range 33.8–53.1% · Record 21–31–2 over 54 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 45.1–64.4% · Record 20–21–1 over 42 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 40.9–60.3% · Record 19–21–2 over 42 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 50.9–74.2% · Record 12–5 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 39.6–60.8% · Record 14–12–3 over 29 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 38.9–62.0% · Record 9–13–2 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 34.9–58.1% · Record 5–13–1 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 39.1–61.4% · Record 11–13–1 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.6% · 90% range 33.4–57.8% · Record 5–12–1 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 44.5–67.5% · Record 10–5–4 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 39.8–63.7% · Record 9–8 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.1–71.1% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 46.1–72.8% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.4–69.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.9–72.9% · Record 7–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.1–71.0% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.8–73.9% · Record 7–0 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.7–72.6% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.4–72.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 39.6–65.8% · Record 2–3–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.4–73.3% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.4% · 90% range 52.2–78.5% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 36.0–63.2% · Record 1–1–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.3–73.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.6–75.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.7% · 90% range 54.7–80.7% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 49.3–76.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.4–76.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.4–71.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 69.6% · 90% range 56.6–82.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.2–64.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 73.3% · 90% range 60.9–85.6% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.5–71.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.6–72.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.9–71.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.5–76.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 31.0–59.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.9–67.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.5–63.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.8–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.2–67.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.8% · 90% range 51.9–79.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.2–74.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.8–78.1% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.8–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.3–76.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.9% · 90% range 30.1–59.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 53.1–81.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 42.7–71.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.4–74.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.1–74.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.7–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 33.1–61.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 68.0% · 90% range 54.4–81.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.9% · 90% range 53.7–80.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.1–73.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.7–64.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.8–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 69.1% · 90% range 56.4–81.8% · Record 2–0–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.6% · 90% range 27.5–55.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 31.4–60.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 45.9–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.3–76.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.3–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.8–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.5–66.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 32.2–63.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 48.7–76.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 44.0–70.5% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.2–66.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 47.9–75.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 43.9–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.5–73.4% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 49.9–77.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.3–80.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.0–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.9% · 90% range 54.5–81.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.4–77.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.5–69.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.2–77.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.1–75.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 43.6–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 72.1% · 90% range 59.0–85.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 47.8–75.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 48.7–76.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.4–67.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 45.7–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.5–69.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 46.5–75.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.7% · 90% range 54.3–81.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.4–76.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.4–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.1–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 68.5% · 90% range 55.2–81.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 53.0–80.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)