Win ratefew games48.5%Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)43.5–53.5 ·272 games
Adjusted for skillfew games50.3%, trend steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)45.3–55.3 · average player
Vs the metafew games48.5%42.8–54.2 · sets the tier
Since C11.1%0.80–1.49% ·59 entries · 19 events
Pilot rating1504−13 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
1.1%range 0.80–1.49% · 59 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 3.1% to 1.1%; low 1.1% (Nov 9), high 3.1% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
3.1% (few)
1.7–5.4%
12
Oct 30
2.5%
1.6–3.9%
21
Oct 31
2.3%
1.6–3.1%
38
Nov 1
2.3%
1.7–3.1%
43
Nov 2
2.2%
1.6–2.9%
50
Nov 3
1.9%
1.4–2.5%
52
Nov 4
1.6%
1.2–2.1%
53
Nov 5
1.5%
1.1–2.1%
54
Nov 6
1.3%
1.0–1.8%
55
Nov 7
1.3%
1.0–1.8%
55
Nov 8
1.2%
0.9–1.7%
58
Nov 9
1.1%
0.8–1.5%
59
Win rate
48.5%range 43.5–53.5% · 272 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 56.9% to 48.5%; low 48.1% (Nov 3), high 56.9% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
56.9% (few)
47.2–65.0%
72
55.2%
Oct 30
54.5%
46.7–62.1%
110
55.9%
Oct 31
51.8%
45.8–57.7%
190
53.0%
Nov 1
50.1%
44.4–55.7%
208
51.4%
Nov 2
48.5%
43.2–53.8%
235
50.2%
Nov 3
48.1%
42.9–53.4%
243
50.1%
Nov 4
49.0%
43.9–54.2%
249
51.0%
Nov 5
48.8%
43.7–54.0%
252
50.9%
Nov 6
48.9%
43.8–54.0%
258
50.8%
Nov 7
48.9%
43.8–54.0%
258
50.8%
Nov 8
48.2%
43.2–53.3%
265
50.2%
Nov 9
48.5%
43.5–53.5%
272
50.3%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 67 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 33.3% · 90% range 22.1–44.5% · Record 7–13 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 41.7–65.2% · Record 11–8–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.3% · 90% range 27.0–51.5% · Record 2–12 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 46.6–71.5% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.6% · 90% range 28.4–52.7% · Record 4–8 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.2% · 90% range 30.8–53.6% · Record 6–13–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.1% · 90% range 34.5–57.7% · Record 9–10–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.8% · 90% range 29.2–56.4% · Record 1–5 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.2% · 90% range 31.9–58.5% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.9% · 90% range 27.7–54.0% · Record 2–8 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 33.9–62.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 32.1–60.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.2% · 90% range 27.8–56.6% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 43.0–67.6% · Record 9–5 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.1–71.4% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 31.4–58.6% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 35.5–63.1% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.9–68.9% · Record 1–3–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.0–64.1% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 42.1–69.1% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.6% · 90% range 32.4–60.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 40.7–70.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.9% · 90% range 27.1–54.6% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.1–65.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 43.8–72.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.8–69.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.0–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.3% · 90% range 33.0–61.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.5% · 90% range 53.9–81.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.5% · 90% range 28.2–56.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 70.3% · 90% range 57.0–83.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.5–63.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.3–69.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.4% · 90% range 28.9–58.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.4–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 32.1–60.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.2–73.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 35.6% · 90% range 21.3–49.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 30.4–59.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 46.8–75.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 32.2–63.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.2–70.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 34.3% · 90% range 20.6–48.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.2–76.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.4–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.0–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 33.9–64.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.2–68.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 33.6–62.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.4% · 90% range 33.0–61.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 41.8–70.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.8–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.5–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.7–69.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.5% · 90% range 25.3–53.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 73.1% · 90% range 60.4–85.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.1–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 35.5–63.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.7% · 90% range 24.1–51.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.7–69.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 51.9–79.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 41.7–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 47.9–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.2–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 53.2–80.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.8–70.3% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)