Win rate55.1%Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)51.8–58.4 ·603 games
Adjusted for skill52.7%, trend steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)49.4–56.1 · average player
Vs the meta54.7%51.6–57.8 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.57×1.23–1.91 · vs expected
Pilot rating1535+17 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
2.7%range 2.20–3.30% · 101 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 0.75% to 2.7%; low 0.59% (Oct 30), high 2.7% (Nov 9). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
0.75% (few)
0.2–2.3%
3
Oct 30
0.59% (few)
0.2–1.5%
5
Oct 31
0.60% (few)
0.3–1.1%
10
Nov 1
0.77% (few)
0.4–1.3%
14
Nov 2
1.2%
0.8–1.7%
24
Nov 3
1.7%
1.3–2.3%
39
Nov 4
2.2%
1.7–2.8%
57
Nov 5
2.2%
1.7–2.9%
61
Nov 6
2.6%
2.1–3.2%
77
Nov 7
2.5%
2.0–3.2%
77
Nov 8
2.6%
2.1–3.3%
89
Nov 9
2.7%
2.2–3.3%
101
Win rate
55.1%range 51.8–58.4% · 603 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 46.7% to 55.1%; low 38.3% (Oct 30), high 56.7% (Nov 5). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
46.7% (few)
30.0–66.7%
15
46.7%
Oct 30
38.3% (few)
30.0–54.4%
26
37.0%
Oct 31
42.9% (few)
31.9–54.6%
49
43.6%
Nov 1
52.1% (few)
43.1–61.0%
82
51.0%
Nov 2
54.8%
48.2–61.3%
153
53.1%
Nov 3
56.2%
51.1–61.2%
258
52.1%
Nov 4
56.5%
52.2–60.8%
359
53.1%
Nov 5
56.7%
52.5–60.8%
388
53.4%
Nov 6
55.5%
51.7–59.2%
476
52.2%
Nov 7
55.5%
51.7–59.2%
476
52.2%
Nov 8
55.1%
51.6–58.6%
546
52.4%
Nov 9
55.1%
51.8–58.4%
603
52.7%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 92 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 58.6–77.0% · Record 35–9–1 over 45 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 50.4–68.7% · Record 32–13–2 over 47 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 67.7% · 90% range 57.7–77.7% · Record 19–7–1 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.9% · 90% range 56.2–73.6% · Record 32–16–2 over 50 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 34.1–56.1% · Record 7–17–2 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 42.1–64.1% · Record 12–8–4 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 35.9–57.8% · Record 9–15–1 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.6% · 90% range 35.5–57.8% · Record 9–15–1 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 36.3–60.2% · Record 8–9 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 51.2–76.2% · Record 7–0 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 46.4–71.1% · Record 4–5–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.9–63.0% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.7–72.6% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 43.6–68.3% · Record 1–8 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 44.1–68.9% · Record 7–5 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.3% · 90% range 50.5–76.0% · Record 5–0–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.6–67.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 34.7–61.2% · Record 0–5 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 49.2–76.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.9% · 90% range 52.9–78.9% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.0% · 90% range 33.5–60.4% · Record 0–3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.7–72.8% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 51.0–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.5% · 90% range 52.4–78.6% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.2–77.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.5% · 90% range 29.4–55.5% · Record 4–1–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.3–74.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.8–66.7% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 72.4% · 90% range 59.7–85.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 76.3% · 90% range 64.7–87.8% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 47.3–73.3% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.8–74.3% · Record 6–0 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.8–76.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 49.0–74.8% · Record 4–0–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 39.4% · 90% range 25.9–53.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.2–67.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.4–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 35.4–64.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.8–77.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.4–75.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 37.7–66.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 54.1–80.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.0–73.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.1% · 90% range 26.7–55.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 46.9–75.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.4–70.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.4–65.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.3–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.5% · 90% range 27.8–55.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.8–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 37.9% · 90% range 24.4–51.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.9–67.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.9–71.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.7–75.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 71.0% · 90% range 58.0–83.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.0–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 43.9–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 69.4% · 90% range 57.0–81.8% · Record 3–0–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 34.5% · 90% range 21.6–47.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.1–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.9–75.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.4–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.3% · 90% range 26.2–56.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.0% · 90% range 26.8–55.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.5–65.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.6–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 43.8% · 90% range 29.1–58.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.1–65.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.6–77.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 44.3–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 64.7% · 90% range 51.1–78.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.9% · 90% range 52.2–79.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.0–71.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.3–69.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.4–75.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.5–75.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 44.8–73.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.0–72.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.8–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 48.3–75.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 45.9–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.5–69.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.3–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 49.2–75.7% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.3–67.5% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.2–76.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 42.9–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)