Meta share1.4%Steady (−4%, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)1.14–1.83% ·66 entries
Win rate54.1%Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)49.7–58.4 ·359 games
Adjusted for skill52.4%, trend steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)48.1–56.7 · average player
Vs the meta53.3%49.6–57.0 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.22×0.84–1.61 · vs expected
Pilot rating1531+12 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
1.4%range 1.14–1.83% · 66 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 1.0% to 1.4%; low 0.97% (Oct 30), high 1.9% (Nov 2). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
1.0% (few)
0.4–2.4%
4
Oct 30
0.97% (few)
0.5–1.8%
8
Oct 31
1.6%
1.1–2.2%
25
Nov 1
1.7%
1.3–2.3%
31
Nov 2
1.9%
1.5–2.5%
41
Nov 3
1.8%
1.4–2.4%
46
Nov 4
1.7%
1.3–2.2%
51
Nov 5
1.7%
1.3–2.2%
53
Nov 6
1.7%
1.4–2.2%
60
Nov 7
1.7%
1.3–2.1%
60
Nov 8
1.5%
1.2–1.9%
62
Nov 9
1.4%
1.1–1.8%
66
Win rate
54.1%range 49.7–58.4% · 359 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 55.8% to 54.1%; low 52.8% (Nov 4), high 55.8% (Oct 29). Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (12 days of Win rate)
Win rate by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Oct 29
55.8% (few)
45.0–65.0%
17
52.2%
Oct 30
52.9% (few)
45.0–65.0%
34
52.7%
Oct 31
54.7%
47.1–62.1%
116
53.1%
Nov 1
54.4%
47.6–61.0%
148
52.9%
Nov 2
53.8%
48.1–59.4%
207
51.9%
Nov 3
54.5%
49.2–59.7%
243
52.4%
Nov 4
52.8%
47.8–57.8%
270
50.7%
Nov 5
54.0%
49.1–58.8%
288
52.1%
Nov 6
53.3%
48.8–57.9%
322
51.7%
Nov 7
53.3%
48.8–57.9%
322
51.7%
Nov 8
53.7%
49.2–58.1%
339
52.0%
Nov 9
54.1%
49.7–58.4%
359
52.4%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 82 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 45.2–66.7% · Record 18–13–1 over 32 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 38.2–59.6% · Record 13–20–1 over 34 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−2.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 35.4–56.7% · Record 10–15–3 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 37.3–59.3% · Record 7–15–1 over 23 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 40.8% · 90% range 30.0–51.7% · Record 5–18–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 44.1–68.4% · Record 11–3 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 49.9–73.1% · Record 10–5–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 49.6–73.2% · Record 13–4 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 40.5–65.7% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.5% · 90% range 32.7–58.3% · Record 2–7 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 40.1–65.3% · Record 5–5 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.9–67.7% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.5pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 31.7–56.4% · Record 8–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 42.4% · 90% range 29.0–55.9% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.5–69.2% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.3pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 46.0–71.3% · Record 7–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 47.5–74.0% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.4pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.4–72.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.8pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 35.6–61.7% · Record 0–5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.6% · 90% range 31.1–58.1% · Record 3–1–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 46.0–72.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 48.0–75.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.4–68.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 42.2–69.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.3–74.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.3–69.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 42.8–71.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.2–71.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 41.1% · 90% range 27.3–54.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.3–77.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.7–70.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.3% · 90% range 49.2–77.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.1pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 35.8–63.3% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.2–63.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.3% · 90% range 31.8–58.9% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 44.9% · 90% range 31.1–58.7% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.9–71.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.7–65.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 36.1–62.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.4–65.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.3–76.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.3–72.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.9pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.4–70.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.8–74.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.1–74.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 47.1–74.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.4–69.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.2–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 32.9–60.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.0–70.4% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.9–73.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.9–70.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 32.1–59.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.3–77.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.5–64.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.7–75.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.0–71.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.4–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 67.2% · 90% range 53.8–80.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.6% · 90% range 31.7–59.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.9% · 90% range 49.9–77.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.3–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.7–61.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.8–71.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.0–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 48.5–77.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.6–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 53.5–80.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.8–76.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 35.8–63.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 30.7–59.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 65.4% · 90% range 52.0–78.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.2–77.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.4–67.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 49.3–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.8–64.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.7–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.7–75.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 49.6–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.6–74.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.8–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.0–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)