Meta share1.4%Steady (−4%, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)1.14–1.83% ·66 entries
Its win rate54.1%Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)49.7–58.4 ·359 games
Top-cut share1.6%
Window
Games
Since C1
Best decks against Hydreigon Mega Absol ex
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
No deck is clearly favored. 4 lean ahead, but each range reaches below 50%.
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Hydreigon Mega Absol ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Hydreigon Mega Absol ex yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
7 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Hydreigon Mega Absol ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 9: 1.0% to 1.4%; low 0.97% (Oct 30), high 1.9% (Nov 2).Show data (12 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
1.0% (few)
0.4–2.4%
4
Oct 30
0.97% (few)
0.5–1.8%
8
Oct 31
1.6%
1.1–2.2%
25
Nov 1
1.7%
1.3–2.3%
31
Nov 2
1.9%
1.5–2.5%
41
Nov 3
1.8%
1.4–2.4%
46
Nov 4
1.7%
1.3–2.2%
51
Nov 5
1.7%
1.3–2.2%
53
Nov 6
1.7%
1.4–2.2%
60
Nov 7
1.7%
1.3–2.1%
60
Nov 8
1.5%
1.2–1.9%
62
Nov 9
1.4%
1.1–1.8%
66
Meta share1.4%Steady
1.03–2.41% ·19 entries1.22× expected (0.84–1.61)
TierBTier Bvs meta 53.3% (49.6–57.0)
Hoopa exMega Absol ex
Win rate vs it59.2%, trend steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)48–70%range ·18–5–1
Giant Cape2 decks · 28 games with · in 43% of their lists
+5.4pp
+5.4pp · 90% range −5.1pp to +16.0pp · 28 games · could be zero
Serena's Choice1 deck · 23 games with · in 69% of their lists
+5.7pp
+5.7pp · 90% range −9.8pp to +18.9pp · 23 games · could be zero
Froakie B1 711 deck · 18 games with · in 46% of their lists
+4.7pp
+4.7pp · 90% range −10.5pp to +18.0pp · 18 games · could be zero
Copycat2 decks · 27 games with · in 47% of their lists
−5.5pp
−5.5pp · 90% range −16.3pp to +5.4pp · 27 games · could be zero
Irida1 deck · 13 games with · in 40% of their lists
−4.8pp
−4.8pp · 90% range −19.9pp to +9.9pp · 13 games · could be zero
May1 deck · 16 games with · in 49% of their lists
−10.2pp
−10.2pp · 90% range −22.5pp to +4.6pp · 16 games · could be zero
Froakie C1 401 deck · 16 games with · in 56% of their lists
−6.9pp
−6.9pp · 90% range −22.7pp to +8.9pp · 16 games · could be zero
(−4%, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)
range 1.14–1.83% ·66 entries ·57 pilots
Share of top cuts1.6%range 1.03–2.41% ·19 entries
Share trend vs the whole 13-day window (steady: −4%, within the noise). Data through Nov 9, 2026.
57.6%
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.1–71.0% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–3 · 4 games
56.0%
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 43.6–68.3% · Record 1–8 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–8 · 9 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.9–68.9% · Record 1–3–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–3–1 · 5 games
54.5%
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 41.7–67.3% · Record 7–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–2 · 9 games
55.1%
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.3–68.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
54.7%
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 41.1–68.2% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0 · 3 games
54.4%
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.5–68.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.9%
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.5–69.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
54.1%
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.3–67.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.3–67.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.5–66.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.3%
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 38.3–64.4% · Record 5–0–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–0–1 · 6 games
50.5%
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 37.1–63.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.7–64.2% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0–1 · 2 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.5–64.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.6%
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.3–64.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.