Loading deck…
MetalodonData through Nov 9
Metalodon
5 pilots · 5 entries · hero card Mega Gardevoir ex
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
| Data through | Meta share | 90% range | entries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2 | 0.05% (few) | 0.0–0.2% | 1 |
| Nov 3 | 0.05% (few) | 0.0–0.2% | 1 |
| Nov 4 | 0.12% (few) | 0.1–0.3% | 3 |
| Nov 5 | 0.12% (few) | 0.0–0.3% | 3 |
| Nov 6 | 0.14% (few) | 0.1–0.3% | 4 |
| Nov 7 | 0.14% (few) | 0.1–0.3% | 4 |
| Nov 8 | 0.12% (few) | 0.1–0.3% | 4 |
| Nov 9 | 0.14% (few) | 0.1–0.3% | 5 |
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
Few recent lists so far (5), so these groups are a rough guide.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
How each card changes the win rate against each of the most common opponents. Colored only when clearly above or below zero.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 18 opponents have few recent games so far, so every row is hatched.
Newest first. Records as reported by Limitless (byes count as wins).
Data through Nov 9, 2026 games25 entries5How these numbers work
| Data through | Win rate | 90% range | games | Adjusted for skill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2 | 50.0% (few) | 22.1–77.9% | 6 | 48.8% |
| Nov 3 | 50.0% (few) | 22.1–77.9% | 6 | 48.8% |
| Nov 4 | 54.0% (few) | 32.6–74.0% | 13 | 54.0% |
| Nov 5 | 54.0% (few) | 32.6–74.0% | 13 | 54.0% |
| Nov 6 | 54.6% (few) | 37.6–70.6% | 22 | 55.4% |
| Nov 7 | 54.6% (few) | 37.6–70.6% | 22 | 55.4% |
| Nov 8 | 54.6% (few) | 37.6–70.6% | 22 | 55.4% |
| Nov 9 | 51.9% (few) | 36.0–67.3% | 25 | 52.4% |
Ralts · 2 copies in nearly every list; lists pick:
Kirlia · 1 copy in 45% of lists; lists pick:
Also in some lists: Serena's Choice 36% · Sabrina 33% · Xerneas 22% · Guzma 22% · Carbink 18%
20 cards in this list
100% of lists, range 63.9–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 63.9–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 63.9–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 63.9–100.0%×1.8
100% of lists, range 63.9–100.0%×1.8
100% of lists, range 63.9–100.0%×1.8
100% of lists, range 63.9–100.0%×1.6
100% of lists, range 63.9–100.0%×1.2
82% of lists, range 42.9–96.6%, trend steady (+1.6pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
64% of lists, range 27.5–89.2%, trend steady (+3.1pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
60% of lists, range 24.4–87.7%×1
55% of lists, range 20.3–84.9%, trend steady (−4.2pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×2
45% of lists, range 15.1–79.7%, trend steady (+4.2pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1.4
36% of lists, range 10.8–72.5%, trend steady (−3.1pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
33% of lists, range 9.5–69.3%, trend steady (−5.5pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
27% of lists, range 5.8–69.6%, trend steady (+5.6pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
27% of lists, range 5.8–69.6%, trend steady (+5.6pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
22% of lists, range 4.4–63.1%, trend steady (+1.3pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
22% of lists, range 4.4–63.1%, trend steady (+1.3pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
18% of lists, range 3.5–57.5%, trend steady (−1.4pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
18% of lists, range 3.4–57.1%, trend steady (−1.6pp, now vs the whole 13-day window, within the noise)×1
