Data through Nov 9

#174 by share

Garchomp

62 pilots · 103 entries · hero card Garchomp

How to beat it Matchups

Meta share0.04%−84%0.01–0.13% · 103 entries

Win rate39.4%Too few recent games35.4–43.6 · 467 games

Adjusted for skill39.6%35.5–43.8 · average player

Vs the meta40.4%36.1–44.8 · sets the tier

Top cuts0.40×0.11–0.69 · vs expected

Pilot rating1506about even vs their opponents

Window

Games

120d

Share and win rate over time

Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.

Meta share

0.04%range 0.01–0.13% · 103 entries

Show data

One row a week, ending with the latest day.

Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through	Meta share	90% range	entries
Aug 31	2.1%	1.7–2.6%	49
Sep 7	1.3%	1.0–1.5%	80
Sep 14	0.73%	0.6–0.9%	96
Sep 21	0.57%	0.4–0.7%	97
Sep 28	0.39%	0.3–0.6%	97
Oct 5	0.10%	0.0–0.3%	97
Oct 12	0.17%	0.1–0.4%	100
Oct 19	0.19%	0.1–0.4%	101
Oct 26	0.12%	0.0–0.3%	101
Nov 2	0.09%	0.0–0.3%	103
Nov 9	0.04%	0.0–0.1%	103

Win rate

39.4%range 35.4–43.6% · 467 games

Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill

Show data

One row a week, ending with the latest day.

Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through	Win rate	90% range	games	Adjusted for skill
Aug 31	45.6%	40.2–51.1%	222	44.9%
Sep 7	41.8%	37.6–46.1%	369	41.3%
Sep 14	40.9%	37.1–44.8%	445	40.6%
Sep 21	40.7%	36.9–44.6%	446	40.4%
Sep 28	40.7%	36.9–44.6%	446	40.4%
Oct 5	40.7%	36.9–44.6%	446	40.4%
Oct 12	39.8%	36.0–43.8%	455	39.7%
Oct 19	39.4%	35.6–43.3%	457	39.3%
Oct 26	39.4%	35.6–43.3%	457	39.3%
Nov 2	39.4%	35.4–43.6%	467	39.6%
Nov 9	39.4%	35.4–43.6%	467	39.6%

Representative list

A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.

Open in builder

Few recent lists (103 in the window, worth about 3 once older ones count less), so these groups are a rough guide.

Core12In nearly every list

Flex2One spot in the deck, a choice of cards

Garchomp · 2 copies in nearly every list; lists pick:

Tech6Optional: in some lists

Also in some lists: Wynaut 50% · Munchlax 49% · Cyrus 49% · Big Malasada 47% · Gible 47% · Field Blower 45% · Goomy 43% · Small Balloon 43%

20 cards in this list

At a glance

Among 6 matchups with enough recent games.

Best matchups

No winning matchup with enough games yet.

Worst matchups

Card usage

How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.

Inclusion Lift Trending

100% of lists, range 48.3–100.0%×1.6
Garchomp B4a 54
No lift · in almost every list
100% of lists, range 48.2–100.0%, trend steady (+1.8pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×2
Cynthia
No lift · in almost every list
97% of lists run two copies2nd copy
Cynthia
2nd copy vs one
Lift−3.3pp
−3.3pp · 90% range −12.5pp to +6.0pp · could be zero
−12.5pp to +6.0pp
100% of lists, range 48.2–100.0%, trend steady (+1.8pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×2
Professor's Research
No lift · in almost every list
100% of lists, range 48.1–100.0%, trend steady (+1.9pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×2
Poké Ball
No lift · in almost every list
99% of lists run two copies2nd copy
Poké Ball
2nd copy vs one
Lift−0.8pp
−0.8pp · 90% range −11.0pp to +9.5pp · could be zero
−11.0pp to +9.5pp
100% of lists, range 48.1–100.0%, trend steady (+4.9pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×2
Rare Candy
Lift+1.7pp
+1.7pp · 90% range −13.3pp to +16.7pp · could be zero
−13.3pp to +16.7pp
98% of lists run two copies2nd copy
Rare Candy
2nd copy vs one
Lift−0.9pp
−0.9pp · 90% range −10.8pp to +9.0pp · could be zero
−10.8pp to +9.0pp
98% of lists, range 46.5–100.0%, trend steady (+3.1pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1.5
Copycat
No lift · in almost every list
51% of lists run two copies2nd copy
Copycat
2nd copy vs one
Lift−0.6pp
−0.6pp · 90% range −10.7pp to +9.4pp · could be zero
−10.7pp to +9.4pp
98% of lists, range 46.0–99.9%, trend steady (+23.8pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Rainbow Cave
Lift+4.6pp
+4.6pp · 90% range −6.6pp to +15.9pp · could be zero
−6.6pp to +15.9pp
3.0% of lists run two copies2nd copy
Rainbow Cave
2nd copy vs one
Lift−4.7pp
−4.7pp · 90% range −15.5pp to +6.0pp · could be zero
−15.5pp to +6.0pp
95% of lists, range 43.3–99.7%, trend +51.9pp (now vs the last 4 weeks)×1
Gabite B4a 53
Lift+0.9pp
+0.9pp · 90% range −10.2pp to +12.0pp · could be zero
−10.2pp to +12.0pp
0.4% of lists run two copies2nd copy
Gabite B4a 53
2nd copy vs one
Lift−1.9pp
−1.9pp · 90% range −13.0pp to +9.2pp · could be zero
−13.0pp to +9.2pp
53% of lists, range 15.6–87.6%, trend steady (+8.9pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Wally
Lift−3.3pp
−3.3pp · 90% range −14.3pp to +7.7pp · could be zero
−14.3pp to +7.7pp
52% of lists, range 14.8–87.2%, trend steady (−36.8pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×2
Gible B4a 52
Lift+0.3pp
+0.3pp · 90% range −14.2pp to +14.9pp · could be zero
−14.2pp to +14.9pp
50% of lists, range 13.7–85.9%, trend steady (+40.5pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Wynaut
Lift+0.1pp
+0.1pp · 90% range −14.4pp to +14.5pp · could be zero
−14.4pp to +14.5pp
49% of lists, range 13.6–85.9%, trend steady (+41.3pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Munchlax
No lift · in too few lists
49% of lists, range 13.2–85.5%, trend steady (+17.7pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Cyrus
Lift−1.0pp
−1.0pp · 90% range −11.9pp to +9.9pp · could be zero
−11.9pp to +9.9pp
48% of lists, range 13.0–85.1%, trend steady (−21.9pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1.1
Mantyke
Lift−4.7pp
−4.7pp · 90% range −17.0pp to +7.5pp · could be zero
−17.0pp to +7.5pp
3.1% of lists run two copies2nd copy
Mantyke
2nd copy vs one
Lift+0.5pp
+0.5pp · 90% range −9.3pp to +10.4pp · could be zero
−9.3pp to +10.4pp
47% of lists, range 12.2–84.6%, trend +41.8pp (now vs the last 4 weeks)×1
Big Malasada
No lift · in too few lists
47% of lists, range 12.2–84.6%, trend +41.1pp (now vs the last 4 weeks)×2
Gible A2a 45
No lift · in too few lists
45% of lists, range 11.4–83.4%, trend steady (+23.9pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Field Blower
Lift−2.1pp
−2.1pp · 90% range −15.4pp to +11.2pp · could be zero
−15.4pp to +11.2pp
44% of lists, range 10.9–83.0%, trend steady (+28.9pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Garchomp A2 123
Lift−2.3pp
−2.3pp · 90% range −15.0pp to +10.4pp · could be zero
−15.0pp to +10.4pp
43% of lists, range 10.8–82.8%, trend steady (+20.7pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Goomy
Lift+3.8pp
+3.8pp · 90% range −9.4pp to +16.9pp · could be zero
−9.4pp to +16.9pp
43% of lists, range 10.5–82.6%, trend steady (+26.1pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
Small Balloon
Lift−3.4pp
−3.4pp · 90% range −15.7pp to +8.9pp · could be zero
−15.7pp to +8.9pp
6.5% of lists, range 0.4–57.6%, trend steady (−29.3pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1.2
X Speed
Lift−4.4pp
−4.4pp · 90% range −15.4pp to +6.6pp · could be zero
−15.4pp to +6.6pp
1.1% of lists run two copies2nd copy
X Speed
2nd copy vs one
Lift−1.0pp
−1.0pp · 90% range −11.6pp to +9.6pp · could be zero
−11.6pp to +9.6pp

38 rarely played · in under 5% of lists, too few for a lift

Tech cards vs top opponents

How each card changes the win rate against each of the most common opponents. Colored only when clearly above or below zero.

Tech vs
Suicune ex Baxcalibur
36.4%
26–47% range
10–20–1
- Goomy
  in 43% of lists · 4 games with · 27 without
  +7.3pp+7.3pp · 90% range −9.0pp to +25.3pp · 4 games · could be zero
- Cyrus
  in 49% of lists · 6 games with · 25 without
  −5.9pp−5.9pp · 90% range −18.4pp to +10.6pp · 6 games · could be zero
- Hiking Trail
  in 1% of lists · 4 games with · 27 without
  +6.0pp+6.0pp · 90% range −9.6pp to +23.5pp · 4 games · could be zero
- Sabrina
  in 4% of lists · 8 games with · 23 without
  +5.2pp+5.2pp · 90% range −9.5pp to +21.8pp · 8 games · could be zero
Head-to-head →
Tech vs
Mega Altaria ex Espeon (B1/B3a)
32.2%
22–43% range
8–18
- Sabrina
  in 4% of lists · 10 games with · 16 without
  +7.4pp+7.4pp · 90% range −6.7pp to +24.0pp · 10 games · could be zero
- Happiny
  in 1% of lists · 7 games with · 19 without
  +6.7pp+6.7pp · 90% range −8.2pp to +24.4pp · 7 games · could be zero
- Protective Poncho
  in 0% of lists · 5 games with · 21 without
  +5.7pp+5.7pp · 90% range −8.8pp to +23.3pp · 5 games · could be zero
- Gabite
  in 95% of lists · 5 games with · 21 without
  −4.3pp−4.3pp · 90% range −15.8pp to +11.6pp · 5 games · could be zero
Head-to-head →
Tech vs
Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2)
45.6%
36–55% range
17–19–3
- Rainbow Cave
  in 98% of lists · 28 games with · 11 without
  +8.3pp+8.3pp · 90% range −8.4pp to +24.0pp · 28 games · could be zero
- Hiking Trail
  in 1% of lists · 11 games with · 28 without
  +8.3pp+8.3pp · 90% range −8.4pp to +24.0pp · 11 games · could be zero
- Sabrina
  in 4% of lists · 16 games with · 23 without
  +4.6pp+4.6pp · 90% range −10.7pp to +19.8pp · 16 games · could be zero
- Cyrus
  in 49% of lists · 9 games with · 30 without
  −4.7pp−4.7pp · 90% range −19.8pp to +12.3pp · 9 games · could be zero
Head-to-head →
Tech vs
Vespiquen ex Shuckle ex
42.4%
31–53% range
14–13
- Happiny
  in 1% of lists · 10 games with · 17 without
  +7.9pp+7.9pp · 90% range −10.8pp to +25.3pp · 10 games · could be zero
- Hiking Trail
  in 1% of lists · 3 games with · 24 without
  +5.8pp+5.8pp · 90% range −11.7pp to +22.7pp · 3 games · could be zero
- Small Balloon
  in 43% of lists · 4 games with · 23 without
  −4.9pp−4.9pp · 90% range −20.8pp to +12.9pp · 4 games · could be zero
- Protective Poncho
  in 0% of lists · 9 games with · 18 without
  +4.5pp+4.5pp · 90% range −12.6pp to +21.3pp · 9 games · could be zero
Head-to-head →
Tech vs
Mega Sceptile ex Greninja
30.6%
19–42% range
1–12–1
- Happiny
  in 1% of lists · 3 games with · 11 without
  +6.7pp+6.7pp · 90% range −8.7pp to +27.2pp · 3 games · could be zero
- Hiking Trail
  in 1% of lists · 3 games with · 11 without
  +5.0pp+5.0pp · 90% range −8.1pp to +22.3pp · 3 games · could be zero
- Cyrus
  in 49% of lists · 2 games with · 12 without
  −2.9pp−2.9pp · 90% range −13.3pp to +12.4pp · 2 games · could be zero
- Rainbow Cave
  in 98% of lists · 12 games with · 2 without
  +3.0pp+3.0pp · 90% range −9.2pp to +19.5pp · 12 games · could be zero
Head-to-head →
Tech vs
Hydreigon Mega Absol ex
30.1%
19–41% range
4–13
- Protective Poncho
  in 0% of lists · 4 games with · 13 without
  +4.9pp+4.9pp · 90% range −9.6pp to +22.9pp · 4 games · could be zero
- Hiking Trail
  in 1% of lists · 4 games with · 13 without
  +4.0pp+4.0pp · 90% range −10.0pp to +21.5pp · 4 games · could be zero
- Gabite
  in 95% of lists · 8 games with · 9 without
  −3.4pp−3.4pp · 90% range −15.0pp to +12.7pp · 8 games · could be zero
- Sabrina
  in 4% of lists · 9 games with · 8 without
  +3.5pp+3.5pp · 90% range −9.8pp to +20.2pp · 9 games · could be zero
Head-to-head →
Tech vs
Butterfree Mega Sceptile ex
41.0%
30–52% range
9–14
- Happiny
  in 1% of lists · 6 games with · 17 without
  +8.5pp+8.5pp · 90% range −9.2pp to +26.8pp · 6 games · could be zero
- Mantyke
  in 48% of lists · 16 games with · 7 without
  −5.2pp−5.2pp · 90% range −18.9pp to +11.8pp · 16 games · could be zero
- Rainbow Cave
  in 98% of lists · 16 games with · 7 without
  +5.3pp+5.3pp · 90% range −10.7pp to +22.5pp · 16 games · could be zero
- Cyrus
  in 49% of lists · 7 games with · 16 without
  −4.2pp−4.2pp · 90% range −18.1pp to +12.7pp · 7 games · could be zero
Head-to-head →
Tech vs
Team Rocket's Weezing ex Hoopa ex
35.1%
24–46% range
6–14–1
- Cyrus
  in 49% of lists · 10 games with · 11 without
  −5.1pp−5.1pp · 90% range −17.5pp to +11.1pp · 10 games · could be zero
- Hiking Trail
  in 1% of lists · 3 games with · 18 without
  +5.0pp+5.0pp · 90% range −10.4pp to +22.8pp · 3 games · could be zero
- Protective Poncho
  in 0% of lists · 6 games with · 15 without
  +3.5pp+3.5pp · 90% range −11.6pp to +21.3pp · 6 games · could be zero
- Gabite
  in 95% of lists · 6 games with · 15 without
  −3.2pp−3.2pp · 90% range −16.3pp to +13.8pp · 6 games · could be zero
Head-to-head →

Matchups

Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. 6 opponents with enough recent games, most-faced first.

Show all 126 (120 with few games)

Matchups

Suicune ex Baxcalibur5.9% of fieldSuicune ex Baxcalibur5.9% of field	36.4% Win rate 36.4% · 90% range 26.2–46.7% · Record 10–20–1 over 31 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.	Steady (−18.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)	36.2%26.0–46.4	10–20–131 games	5.9%
Mega Altaria ex Espeon (B1/B3a)3.3% of fieldMega Altaria ex Espeon (B1/B3a)3.3% of field	32.2% Win rate 32.2% · 90% range 21.8–42.7% · Record 8–18 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.	Steady (−19.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)	33.0%22.5–43.5	8–1826 games	3.3%
Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2)2.9% of fieldMega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2)2.9% of field	45.6% Win rate 45.6% · 90% range 35.8–55.4% · Record 17–19–3 over 39 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.	Steady (+4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)	44.9%35.1–54.7	17–19–339 games	2.9%
Vespiquen ex Shuckle ex2.7% of fieldVespiquen ex Shuckle ex2.7% of field	42.4% Win rate 42.4% · 90% range 31.3–53.4% · Record 14–13 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.	Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)	42.8%31.9–53.8	14–1327 games	2.7%
Butterfree Mega Sceptile ex0.64% of fieldButterfree Mega Sceptile ex0.64% of field	41.0% Win rate 41.0% · 90% range 29.8–52.2% · Record 9–14 over 23 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.	Steady (+2.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)	41.2%30.1–52.3	9–1423 games	0.64%
Team Rocket's Weezing ex Hoopa ex0.05% of fieldTeam Rocket's Weezing ex Hoopa ex0.05% of field	35.1% Win rate 35.1% · 90% range 24.3–46.0% · Record 6–14–1 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Leans on the prediction.	Steady (+0.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)	34.2%23.0–45.4	6–14–121 games	0.05%

Sort

Recent top-8 lists

Newest first. Records as reported by Limitless (byes count as wins).

2nd
FrogEX | Cosmo6-3-0
Dark League Pop Up(opens Limitless in a new tab)· 21 players · Aug 28
Build

Data through Nov 9, 2026 games467 entries103How these numbers work