Win rate51.8%Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)50.0–53.5 ·6.5k games
Adjusted for skill50.7%, trend steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)49.4–52.1 · average player
Vs the meta50.8%48.0–53.6 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.05×0.94–1.17 · vs expected
Pilot rating1522+7 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.98%range 0.68–1.40% · 1,334 entries
Meta share by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 3.3% to 0.98%; low 0.84% (Nov 2), high 14% (Aug 2). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 3
13%
11.6–14.3%
403
Aug 10
8.7%
7.9–9.6%
656
Aug 17
7.3%
6.6–8.0%
741
Aug 24
5.9%
5.2–6.6%
789
Aug 31
2.0%
1.5–2.7%
816
Sep 7
1.3%
1.0–1.7%
850
Sep 14
3.4%
3.0–3.9%
993
Sep 21
4.2%
3.7–4.7%
1,059
Sep 28
4.5%
3.9–5.2%
1,109
Oct 5
3.7%
2.9–4.7%
1,159
Oct 12
6.1%
5.1–7.2%
1,254
Oct 19
5.2%
4.4–6.1%
1,279
Oct 26
4.5%
3.7–5.5%
1,301
Nov 2
0.84%
0.5–1.4%
1,312
Nov 9
0.98%
0.7–1.4%
1,334
Win rate
51.8%range 50.0–53.5% · 6,540 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Adjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 47.4% to 51.8%; low 47.4% (Jul 30), high 53.7% (Jul 31). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Aug 3
49.0%
46.4–51.5%
1,756
48.8%
Aug 10
50.3%
48.3–52.2%
3,070
50.4%
Aug 17
50.3%
48.5–52.1%
3,487
50.5%
Aug 24
50.2%
48.5–52.0%
3,726
50.3%
Aug 31
50.3%
48.6–52.1%
3,865
50.4%
Sep 7
50.0%
48.3–51.7%
4,023
50.2%
Sep 14
51.5%
49.8–53.2%
4,878
51.2%
Sep 21
51.9%
50.2–53.5%
5,202
51.4%
Sep 28
51.0%
49.4–52.6%
5,404
50.5%
Oct 5
51.2%
49.5–52.8%
5,663
50.5%
Oct 12
51.8%
50.1–53.4%
6,125
51.0%
Oct 19
51.7%
50.0–53.3%
6,257
50.8%
Oct 26
51.4%
49.7–53.0%
6,349
50.6%
Nov 2
51.5%
49.9–53.2%
6,412
50.8%
Nov 9
51.8%
50.0–53.5%
6,540
50.7%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 522 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 43.3–68.1% · Record 8–6–2 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 35.3–61.3% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 37.5–64.3% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 34.8–60.1% · Record 3–5–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 41.1–67.7% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 33.0–59.9% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.7–73.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 42.1–69.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.1% · 90% range 32.4–59.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.1–67.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.1–70.5% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 41.6–65.2% · Record 9–12 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+33.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.2–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.5–77.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.4% · 90% range 33.4–61.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.4% · 90% range 34.8–52.0% · Record 44–95–5 over 144 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.5–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 48.7–76.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 41.9–60.7% · Record 34–29–2 over 65 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.3% · 90% range 33.6–57.1% · Record 14–14–1 over 29 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 39.6–63.4% · Record 12–8–1 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−21.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 36.9–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 39.3–56.3% · Record 45–58–4 over 107 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.1–67.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.2–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 46.3–67.8% · Record 23–13–1 over 37 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 43.6–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.3–76.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 43.0–67.9% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 44.8–66.3% · Record 31–14–1 over 46 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−20.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 47.3–64.7% · Record 53–33–1 over 87 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−3.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 48.0–72.4% · Record 17–8 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.0–69.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.4–74.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 37.9–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 38.8–63.2% · Record 9–9–2 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.5% · 90% range 52.3–78.8% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.6–67.5% · Record 2–6 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−26.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.3–68.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.1–76.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.7–64.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 35.9–63.8% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−19.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 35.9–64.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.0–74.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 33.0–58.9% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 44.3–64.1% · Record 28–26–1 over 55 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+8.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 43.9–68.7% · Record 8–11 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+42.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 38.3–68.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 45.1–69.9% · Record 11–9 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+29.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.0–72.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 40.0–65.1% · Record 13–9 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+24.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 47.4–71.4% · Record 14–1–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.8–68.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 44.6–67.5% · Record 15–10–1 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−17.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 48.2–73.0% · Record 8–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.8% · 90% range 35.9–55.7% · Record 30–38–1 over 69 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−15.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 35.5–59.8% · Record 14–15 over 29 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−29.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 44.8–66.8% · Record 16–15–1 over 32 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.4–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.8–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.0% · 90% range 53.6–80.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 47.8–72.9% · Record 5–4 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 44.8–73.1% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.4–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.0–74.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.9–68.5% · Record 2–1–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.3–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.2% · 90% range 34.0–56.3% · Record 8–14–2 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+3.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.6% · 90% range 33.2–60.0% · Record 1–5–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 36.1–56.9% · Record 16–29–1 over 46 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−16.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 48.1–69.4% · Record 23–21–1 over 45 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+6.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.8–72.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.3–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.1% · 90% range 32.4–55.8% · Record 7–14–1 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 42.5–67.8% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 43.8–67.7% · Record 13–12–1 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.7–72.4% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+33.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.2–68.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 43.2–69.4% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.8–62.9% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+30.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 43.1–70.1% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.3–74.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 45.6–70.7% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 49.2–76.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 49.0–72.7% · Record 12–4–1 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 46.1–72.8% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.3–74.6% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.6% · 90% range 53.3–79.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.5–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 31.8–58.3% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.6–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 47.5–76.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.5–74.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 44.9–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.3–74.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.4–71.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.6% · 90% range 53.2–80.1% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.5–72.1% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.2–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.2–73.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.2% · 90% range 52.5–80.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.0% · 90% range 32.9–61.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.6–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.7–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.7–73.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.2–74.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 46.8–74.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 40.0–66.0% · Record 7–6–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−38.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 42.3–67.9% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.8–70.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 45.0–70.6% · Record 5–2–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.0–77.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.6–72.8% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.2% · 90% range 53.7–78.6% · Record 11–2 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−26.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.2% · 90% range 52.3–80.1% · Record 8–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 43.2–67.8% · Record 8–10 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+39.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.4–76.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 43.1–69.8% · Record 5–2–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 42.7–66.9% · Record 10–7–1 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.9–73.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.8–68.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 46.9–67.6% · Record 21–13–1 over 35 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.8–76.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.7–65.5% · Record 1–8 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+25.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.5–70.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 32.7–55.2% · Record 14–14 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 36.8–62.5% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.3–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 48.6–73.5% · Record 8–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 35.3–61.6% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 43.6–67.4% · Record 8–7 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.5–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 43.0–70.3% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.8–76.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.6–66.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.5–70.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 46.1–71.4% · Record 9–3 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−35.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 31.2–59.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 46.3–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.1–74.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 35.9–64.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+39.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.2% · 90% range 31.9–58.5% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.0–70.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.9–71.0% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.9–68.2% · Record 2–3–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.2–69.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−19.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.5–69.9% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 47.3–71.0% · Record 10–9 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 33.1–60.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.0–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.4–75.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.7–73.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.7–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 35.8–63.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 34.6–58.9% · Record 1–14–3 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.8–72.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.7–72.4% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.9–71.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−39.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.5–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 52.2–74.1% · Record 21–12–1 over 34 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+20.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 34.0–61.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.1–71.4% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−28.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.0% · 90% range 52.7–79.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.9–67.5% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−40.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 51.1–77.8% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.6–70.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.8–76.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.9–70.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 43.6–74.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 40.0–66.3% · Record 6–4 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.8–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.6–73.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 51.0–77.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 48.0–74.6% · Record 7–0 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.6–69.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.8–71.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 44.0–71.4% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.5–67.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.7–71.6% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 48.0–72.8% · Record 10–1 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.7–72.7% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−31.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.5–67.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.1–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.1–72.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.5–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.0–71.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.9% · 90% range 52.6–77.2% · Record 9–3 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−28.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.9–76.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.8–67.4% · Record 0–3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.3–73.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.7–73.5% · Record 2–1–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.4–75.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 52.3–79.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 47.3–73.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.4–72.6% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 33.3–61.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 42.7–71.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.0–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.6–74.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.3–66.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.5–73.0% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.6–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.6–71.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.4–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 54.3–81.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.7–71.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.8–75.0% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 49.0–72.9% · Record 7–6 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.3–74.0% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−40.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.4–65.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.5–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.3–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.5–67.5% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.4–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.9% · 90% range 55.1–80.7% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 34.8–62.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.6% · 90% range 55.4–81.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.2–71.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.8–66.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.8–74.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.4–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 44.7–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.7–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.5–74.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.9–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.9–69.5% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 39.1–66.6% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.7–65.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.2–70.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 49.2–76.2% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.8–75.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.8–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.2–70.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.1–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.7–72.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.7–67.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.2–70.8% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.1–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.2–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.9–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.6–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.0–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.7–70.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.8–76.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 36.0–63.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.2–71.5% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.7–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 39.0–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.5–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.3–73.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.9–73.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.6–76.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 46.5–74.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.6–71.1% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+22.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 49.2–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.5–76.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 37.0–60.9% · Record 4–14 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.4–72.9% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.1–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 45.0–72.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 46.9–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.2–76.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.0% · 90% range 57.3–82.7% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.3% · 90% range 49.7–76.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.5–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 51.7–78.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 40.0–67.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.7–64.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.6–68.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.6–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.2–72.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.3–76.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.6–66.4% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.2–69.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.0–69.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.4–65.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 38.0–65.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.7–75.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.3–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.5% · 90% range 52.9–78.1% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 47.6–75.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 43.0–69.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 39.9–68.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 50.9–78.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.8% · 90% range 27.8–53.7% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.7–71.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.8–65.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.2–73.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.0–65.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.8–75.1% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 43.0–70.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.7–69.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.1–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.1–72.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.1–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.8–77.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.9–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.5–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 49.2–76.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.0–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.3% · 90% range 34.7–59.8% · Record 4–6 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.0–73.0% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.1–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.4–77.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.7–73.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 51.1–77.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.0–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 52.2–79.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.9–71.9% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.3–67.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.7–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.2–76.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.4% · 90% range 53.0–79.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.8–74.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.2–69.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 49.1–76.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 45.1–72.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 53.3–80.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 40.0–67.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.9–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.0–73.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.1–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 51.8–78.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.7–70.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.8–77.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.4–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.0–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.4–60.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.4–75.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.5–69.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 52.1–78.3% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 45.0–71.8% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.6–76.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.6–75.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.7–77.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.7% · 90% range 56.5–82.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.4–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.7% · 90% range 52.4–78.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.6–70.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.0% · 90% range 52.7–79.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.7–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.5–76.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.9–78.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.0% · 90% range 53.7–80.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 46.9–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.7–67.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.8–77.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.2–71.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.7–67.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.2–69.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.1–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 38.9–67.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.6–69.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.3–68.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 46.9–74.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.6–65.6% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.6–72.0% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.8–69.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.0–71.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.8–74.9% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.7–75.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 50.2–76.7% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.3–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.9–73.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.7–74.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.9–68.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.3% · 90% range 32.5–58.0% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.7% · 90% range 33.1–60.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.7–68.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.3–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.4–67.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.3–73.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.7–69.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.6–75.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.6–69.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.5–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.4–70.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.2–73.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 40.2–66.8% · Record 0–5 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.5–74.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.6–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.5–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.4–68.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.9–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 48.2–75.2% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.7% · 90% range 52.3–79.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 41.4–67.6% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 39.7–68.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 39.5–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.6–75.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 45.0–71.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.8–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.3–77.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.6–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.6–70.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.0–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.8–68.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.3–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 49.3–75.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.9–71.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 47.2–72.8% · Record 4–1–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.8–77.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.4–74.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.2–77.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.8–78.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.1–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.7–72.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.2–75.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.5–73.2% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.6% · 90% range 57.8–83.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 53.7–79.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 42.9–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.5–72.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.7–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.1–76.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 49.3–75.3% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 45.9–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.6–71.7% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.3–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.9–71.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.1–64.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.3–69.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.1–70.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.1–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 40.0–67.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.7–70.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.4–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.3–73.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.5–69.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.7–75.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.5–67.5% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.4–75.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.4–66.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.6–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.0% · 90% range 52.8–79.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 43.7–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 43.2–70.1% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.1–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.4–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.6–77.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.3–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.0–78.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 48.8–76.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.6–69.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.9% · 90% range 55.5–82.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.6–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.4–75.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.7–72.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.8–71.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.5–72.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.6–78.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.0–69.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.8–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.4–78.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.2–71.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.7–71.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.2–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.8–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.3–76.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.4–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.9–74.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.1–67.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 52.9–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.7–67.8% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.0–74.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.1–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.7–78.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.7–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 52.8–79.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.9–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.6–77.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.2% · 90% range 55.8–82.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.0–73.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 38.9–67.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.7–67.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.1% · 90% range 54.7–81.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.4–75.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.3–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.6–77.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 46.7–75.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.6% · 90% range 56.8–82.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.6–77.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.1–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 49.7–78.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.6–75.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.1–71.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.4–77.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.9–71.0% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.8% · 90% range 51.2–78.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.9–70.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.4–65.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.0–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.7–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.7–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.4% · 90% range 53.0–79.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.4–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.3–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.9–68.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)