Loading deck…
MetalodonData through Nov 9
Metalodon
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
| Data through | Meta share | 90% range | entries |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13 | 0.54% | 0.4–0.7% | 40 |
| Jul 20 | 0.44% | 0.3–0.6% | 44 |
| Jul 27 | 0.36% | 0.2–0.5% | 46 |
| Aug 3 | 0.05% | 0.0–0.2% | 46 |
| Aug 10 | 0.13% | 0.1–0.2% | 52 |
| Aug 17 | 0.14% | 0.1–0.2% | 54 |
| Aug 24 | 0.09% | 0.0–0.2% | 54 |
| Aug 31 | 0.95% | 0.7–1.3% | 73 |
| Sep 7 | 2.1% | 1.8–2.5% | 149 |
| Sep 14 | 2.1% | 1.8–2.4% | 232 |
| Sep 21 | 1.9% | 1.6–2.1% | 246 |
| Sep 28 | 1.4% | 1.2–1.7% | 250 |
| Oct 5 | 0.77% | 0.5–1.1% | 252 |
| Oct 12 | 0.62% | 0.4–0.9% | 252 |
| Oct 19 | 0.58% | 0.4–0.8% | 251 |
| Oct 26 | 0.41% | 0.3–0.7% | 251 |
| Nov 2 | 0.04% | 0.0–0.2% | 250 |
| Nov 9 | 0.02% | 0.0–0.1% | 226 |
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
Limitless names this deck in several ways, after the Pokémon a list runs. Each version shows its share of the deck, its win rate adjusted for skill and the cards that set it apart.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
How each card changes the win rate against each of the most common opponents. Colored only when clearly above or below zero.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 178 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Newest first. Records as reported by Limitless (byes count as wins).
Data through Nov 9, 2026 games1,193 entries226How these numbers work
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
| Data through | Win rate | 90% range | games | Adjusted for skill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13 | 53.0% | 47.3–58.7% | 222 | 51.5% |
| Jul 20 | 51.9% | 46.4–57.4% | 238 | 50.0% |
| Jul 27 | 52.8% | 47.4–58.2% | 247 | 50.6% |
| Aug 3 | 52.8% | 47.4–58.2% | 247 | 50.6% |
| Aug 10 | 52.2% | 46.9–57.5% | 276 | 50.3% |
| Aug 17 | 51.3% | 46.0–56.6% | 284 | 50.1% |
| Aug 24 | 51.3% | 46.0–56.6% | 284 | 50.1% |
| Aug 31 | 55.0% | 50.0–59.8% | 401 | 55.7% |
| Sep 7 | 52.2% | 49.1–55.3% | 858 | 51.2% |
| Sep 14 | 49.9% | 47.4–52.4% | 1,253 | 49.5% |
| Sep 21 | 49.5% | 47.1–52.0% | 1,313 | 49.1% |
| Sep 28 | 49.2% | 46.8–51.6% | 1,333 | 48.9% |
| Oct 5 | 48.7% | 46.3–51.1% | 1,348 | 48.4% |
| Oct 12 | 48.7% | 46.2–51.1% | 1,357 | 48.4% |
| Oct 19 | 48.4% | 46.0–50.9% | 1,347 | 48.1% |
| Oct 26 | 48.6% | 46.1–51.0% | 1,348 | 48.1% |
| Nov 2 | 48.6% | 46.2–51.1% | 1,345 | 48.1% |
| Nov 9 | 48.4% | 45.9–50.9% | 1,193 | 48.0% |
1 copyTapu Lele88% of lists
1 copySabrina56% of lists
1 copyLucky Ice Pop54% of lists
1 copyMars50% of lists
2 copiesChingling39% of lists
1 copyOricorio34% of listsAlso in some lists: Furfrou 59% · Bonsly 57% · Repel 44% · Small Balloon 43%
20 cards in this list
Among 15 matchups with enough recent games.
Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2)2.9% of field · 62–50
Mega Altaria ex Espeon (B1/B3a)3.3% of field · 51–41–2
Butterfree Mega Sceptile ex0.64% of field · 36–29–3
Team Rocket's Weezing ex Hoopa ex0.05% of field · 21–21–2Chingling2% of its lists · 100% of the restFurfrou94% of its lists · 0% of the rest
Bonsly91% of its lists · 0% of the restChingling100% of its lists · 2% of the restFurfrou0% of its lists · 94% of the restBonsly0% of its lists · 91% of the rest
100% of lists, range 89.5–100.0%×2
100% of lists, range 89.5–100.0%×1
100% of lists, range 89.5–100.0%×1.772% of lists run two copies2nd copy
100% of lists, range 89.3–100.0%, trend steady (+1.2pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
100% of lists, range 89.1–100.0%, trend steady (+2.8pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
100% of lists, range 89.1–100.0%×2
99% of lists, range 87.5–99.9%, trend steady (+2.6pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
97% of lists, range 84.0–99.3%, trend steady (+1.0pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1.443% of lists run two copies2nd copy
96% of lists, range 82.5–99.0%, trend steady (+3.1pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×188% of lists, range 72.9–95.4%, trend steady (−3.3pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×159% of lists, range 37.6–76.8%, trend steady (+16.7pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×157% of lists, range 35.1–76.5%, trend steady (+8.3pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×156% of lists, range 30.3–78.9%, trend −31.8pp (now vs the last 4 weeks)×154% of lists, range 29.6–77.2%, trend −23.2pp (now vs the last 4 weeks)×150% of lists, range 27.1–72.4%, trend −31.8pp (now vs the last 4 weeks)×1
44% of lists, range 21.4–69.8%, trend +30.6pp (now vs the last 4 weeks)×1
43% of lists, range 20.1–69.3%, trend +27.8pp (now vs the last 4 weeks)×139% of lists, range 21.3–60.2%, trend steady (−11.2pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×234% of lists, range 18.3–53.9%, trend steady (−15.0pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
6.0% of lists, range 1.7–19.6%, trend steady (+1.8pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
5.1% of lists, range 1.3–18.4%, trend steady (+2.5pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
3.1% of lists, range 0.6–15.6%, trend steady (−1.1pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
3.0% of lists, range 0.5–15.3%, trend steady (+0.9pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
2.7% of lists, range 0.4–14.9%×1
2.7% of lists, range 0.4–14.9%, trend steady (+1.5pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
2.6% of lists, range 0.4–14.8%, trend steady (+1.5pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
1.7% of lists, range 0.2–13.3%×1
0.9% of lists, range 0.1–12.1%, trend steady (−3.7pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.7% of lists, range 0.0–11.7%×1
0.6% of lists, range 0.0–11.6%, trend steady (−0.7pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.6% of lists, range 0.0–11.5%, trend steady (−0.7pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.5% of lists, range 0.0–11.4%, trend steady (−0.7pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.5% of lists, range 0.0–11.3%, trend steady (−0.8pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.4% of lists, range 0.0–11.3%, trend steady (−1.0pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.4% of lists, range 0.0–11.2%, trend steady (−1.9pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.3% of lists, range 0.0–11.1%, trend steady (−0.5pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.3% of lists, range 0.0–11.1%×1
0.2% of lists, range 0.0–10.9%×2
0.2% of lists, range 0.0–10.9%, trend steady (−1.4pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.1% of lists, range 0.0–10.7%, trend steady (−0.6pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
0.1% of lists, range 0.0–10.7%×1
0.1% of lists, range 0.0–10.7%, trend steady (−1.4pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1.7
0.1% of lists, range 0.0–10.6%×1
0.0% of lists, range 0.0–10.5%×1
0.0% of lists, range 0.0–10.5%×1
0.0% of lists, range 0.0–10.5%×1
0.0% of lists, range 0.0–10.5%, trend steady (−0.6pp, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)×1
