Meta share0.40%Steady (−24%, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)0.25–0.64% ·196 entries
Win rate52.3%Steady (−2.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)48.9–55.7 ·1.1k games
Adjusted for skill51.4%, trend steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)48.0–54.8 · average player
Vs the meta55.5%51.7–59.3 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.07×0.82–1.33 · vs expected
Pilot rating1518+7 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.40%range 0.25–0.64% · 196 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 0.11% to 0.40%; low 0.06% (Jul 31), high 1.4% (Aug 16). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 3
0.17% (few)
0.1–0.4%
5
Aug 10
1.2%
0.9–1.4%
60
Aug 17
1.4%
1.2–1.7%
95
Aug 24
1.1%
0.9–1.4%
102
Aug 31
0.66%
0.4–1.0%
116
Sep 7
0.71%
0.5–1.0%
137
Sep 14
0.58%
0.4–0.8%
151
Sep 21
0.56%
0.4–0.8%
156
Sep 28
0.54%
0.4–0.8%
161
Oct 5
0.47%
0.3–0.8%
167
Oct 12
0.38%
0.2–0.7%
171
Oct 19
0.49%
0.3–0.8%
176
Oct 26
0.65%
0.4–1.0%
181
Nov 2
0.23%
0.1–0.5%
186
Nov 9
0.40%
0.2–0.6%
196
Win rate
52.3%range 48.9–55.7% · 1,104 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 33.3% to 52.3%; low 33.3% (Jul 30), high 54.8% (Oct 16). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Aug 3
44.9% (few)
30.8–59.8%
29
43.4%
Aug 10
51.6%
47.1–56.0%
342
50.3%
Aug 17
53.6%
49.9–57.1%
522
51.7%
Aug 24
54.0%
50.5–57.4%
572
52.1%
Aug 31
54.7%
51.4–57.9%
662
52.7%
Sep 7
54.2%
51.2–57.3%
786
51.3%
Sep 14
53.7%
50.7–56.6%
865
51.1%
Sep 21
53.0%
50.0–55.9%
884
50.6%
Sep 28
52.9%
50.0–55.9%
908
50.6%
Oct 5
53.1%
50.1–56.0%
943
50.6%
Oct 12
54.5%
51.5–57.5%
970
52.7%
Oct 19
54.8%
51.7–57.8%
996
53.5%
Oct 26
53.6%
50.5–56.8%
1,021
52.4%
Nov 2
53.0%
49.7–56.2%
1,044
51.9%
Nov 9
52.3%
48.9–55.7%
1,104
51.4%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 194 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 42.4–66.1% · Record 16–14–2 over 32 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.4–71.4% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 44.8–66.8% · Record 27–12–1 over 40 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.4–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 37.7–57.4% · Record 40–49–4 over 93 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−3.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.0% · 90% range 35.5–58.5% · Record 8–22 over 30 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 44.0–70.3% · Record 0–5 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 45.1–72.0% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 50.6–70.5% · Record 37–15–5 over 57 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−14.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 40.9–58.6% · Record 42–50–5 over 97 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 36.3–62.9% · Record 4–6–1 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 47.7–72.6% · Record 16–3 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.3% · 90% range 31.6–55.0% · Record 11–20–2 over 33 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+39.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.7–70.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.8–69.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 47.1–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 43.8–69.2% · Record 11–4 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 50.4–76.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 40.3–65.1% · Record 4–10–1 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 38.8% · 90% range 28.9–48.7% · Record 18–24–2 over 44 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−5.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.8–73.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.6–68.7% · Record 1–3–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.1–73.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.1% · 90% range 58.4–83.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.4–72.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 40.5–65.3% · Record 13–8–1 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−21.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 43.8–68.5% · Record 11–8 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.9–68.6% · Record 4–2–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.2% · 90% range 33.1–61.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 37.0–62.9% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.0–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.8–67.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 44.6–70.8% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.3–68.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.1% · 90% range 56.5–83.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 52.9–79.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.1–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 43.4–69.6% · Record 3–2–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 47.8–70.7% · Record 15–11–1 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+30.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.7% · 90% range 30.4–57.1% · Record 1–8 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+60.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.0–74.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 47.0–73.6% · Record 2–2–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 37.2–63.9% · Record 5–4 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+28.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.4–70.9% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.5% · 90% range 30.6–56.3% · Record 5–5 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+37.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.8–72.8% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.1% · 90% range 58.1–84.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 44.5–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 44.0–69.3% · Record 5–10 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.6–64.3% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.7–70.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.4–71.2% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.3–76.4% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.4–63.9% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−33.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.9–65.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 51.0–76.2% · Record 3–3–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−36.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 54.6–81.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.7–65.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.4–65.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.4–65.0% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−15.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.1% · 90% range 31.2–57.1% · Record 3–4–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+28.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.3% · 90% range 53.6–79.1% · Record 7–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 47.9–71.7% · Record 9–4–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 35.9–63.8% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.8% · 90% range 52.0–79.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 49.6–75.0% · Record 2–6 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.2–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.3–73.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.7% · 90% range 57.5–81.9% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.8–77.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 49.1–75.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+22.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.8–77.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 50.9–75.3% · Record 5–4–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.7% · 90% range 56.6–82.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.4% · 90% range 58.6–84.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.7–76.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.8–68.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.1–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.4% · 90% range 51.9–78.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 53.9–80.3% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 34.9–63.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 46.3–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.6% · 90% range 31.0–58.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.5–71.6% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.6–73.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 48.0–75.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.2–73.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 54.8–80.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+39.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.7% · 90% range 51.3–78.2% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 52.8–77.2% · Record 8–1–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.5–76.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 49.3–75.8% · Record 4–0–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 46.2–72.2% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.1–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.9–67.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.5–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 48.1–74.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.0% · 90% range 57.2–82.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.3–70.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.9–71.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.1% · 90% range 56.5–83.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.7% · 90% range 54.4–81.0% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.0–68.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 51.0–77.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.1–72.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.3–74.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 52.4–78.7% · Record 3–1–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.1–70.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.4–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.3% · 90% range 58.9–81.6% · Record 14–4–1 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 42.1–69.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 33.9–62.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 50.1–76.6% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−18.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 50.0–76.9% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.5% · 90% range 29.5–57.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.3% · 90% range 57.9–82.7% · Record 3–0–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 53.4–80.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 50.1–76.7% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.9% · 90% range 50.3–77.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 72.3% · 90% range 60.1–84.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.1–77.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 54.0–80.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.6–78.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.2% · 90% range 52.8–79.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.5–78.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.3% · 90% range 32.2–60.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.5–76.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.4% · 90% range 56.3–82.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.9% · 90% range 55.8–82.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 46.8–75.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.8% · 90% range 51.4–78.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.9–75.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 74.8% · 90% range 62.8–86.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.5–67.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 53.3–80.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.0% · 90% range 57.0–83.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.9–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 52.0–78.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.6% · 90% range 54.6–80.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.0% · 90% range 52.4–79.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.1% · 90% range 55.1–81.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.5% · 90% range 54.4–80.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.3–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.3–73.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.4% · 90% range 54.2–80.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 30.4–58.2% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.7–75.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.4% · 90% range 55.4–81.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.8–77.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.9–74.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.5–78.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.6% · 90% range 30.8–58.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.8% · 90% range 52.1–79.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.0–75.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.0% · 90% range 55.1–81.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.5% · 90% range 53.5–81.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.7–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.0–78.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 46.9–75.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 72.1% · 90% range 59.5–84.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.6% · 90% range 57.7–83.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.9–76.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 52.3–78.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.4% · 90% range 55.4–81.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.3–74.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.9–73.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.5% · 90% range 55.5–81.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.3–74.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.3% · 90% range 54.0–80.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 72.8% · 90% range 60.4–85.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.1–71.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.7–78.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.7% · 90% range 51.2–78.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.0–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.1–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.1% · 90% range 58.1–84.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.6% · 90% range 54.4–80.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.4% · 90% range 52.9–79.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.3% · 90% range 49.4–77.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.8–67.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.6–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.7–78.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.8% · 90% range 51.4–78.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.8–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.4–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.4–72.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.6% · 90% range 53.4–79.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.4–77.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 51.6–78.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.3–75.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.0–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)