Meta share0.40%Steady (−23%, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)0.25–0.64% ·196 entries
Its win rate52.3%Steady (−2.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)48.9–55.7 ·1.1k games
Top-cut share0.29%
Window
Games
120d
Best decks against Hoopa ex Mega Sableye ex
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
2 favored counters (whole range above 50%), 2 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Hoopa ex Mega Sableye ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Hoopa ex Mega Sableye ex yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
20 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Hoopa ex Mega Sableye ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 0.11% to 0.40%; low 0.06% (Jul 31), high 1.4% (Aug 16).Show data (15 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 3
0.17% (few)
0.1–0.4%
5
Aug 10
1.2%
0.9–1.4%
60
Aug 17
1.4%
1.2–1.7%
95
Aug 24
1.1%
0.9–1.4%
102
Aug 31
0.66%
0.4–1.0%
116
Sep 7
0.71%
0.5–1.0%
137
Sep 14
0.58%
0.4–0.8%
151
Sep 21
0.56%
0.4–0.8%
156
Sep 28
0.54%
0.4–0.8%
161
Oct 5
0.47%
0.3–0.8%
167
Oct 12
0.38%
0.2–0.7%
171
Oct 19
0.49%
0.3–0.8%
176
Oct 26
0.65%
0.4–1.0%
181
Nov 2
0.23%
0.1–0.5%
186
Nov 9
0.40%
0.2–0.6%
196
0.12–0.71% ·69 entries1.07× expected (0.82–1.33)
TierATier Avs meta 55.5% (51.7–59.4)
Vespiquen exShuckle ex
Win rate vs it65.3%, trend steady (−7.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)56–75%range ·54–19
Bonsly1 deck · 71 games with · in 85% of their lists
+7.2pp
+7.2pp · 90% range −7.1pp to +19.7pp · 71 games · could be zero
Pokémon Center Lady2 decks · 86 games with · in 74% of their lists
+2.6pp
+2.6pp · 90% range −7.7pp to +12.9pp · 86 games · could be zero
Small Balloon2 decks · 72 games with · in 40% of their lists
+2.7pp
+2.7pp · 90% range −8.2pp to +13.5pp · 72 games · could be zero
Sabrina2 decks · 78 games with · in 70% of their lists
+1.1pp
+1.1pp · 90% range −9.4pp to +11.5pp · 78 games · could be zero
X Speed1 deck · 50 games with · in 97% of their lists
+4.6pp
+4.6pp · 90% range −10.8pp to +18.0pp · 50 games · could be zero
Erika1 deck · 31 games with · in 4% of their lists
+3.3pp
+3.3pp · 90% range −11.0pp to +14.9pp · 31 games · could be zero
Hitmonlee1 deck · 52 games with · in 75% of their lists
+2.7pp
+2.7pp · 90% range −11.7pp to +15.9pp · 52 games · could be zero
Sawk1 deck · 21 games with · in 12% of their lists
+3.2pp
+3.2pp · 90% range −11.7pp to +16.9pp · 21 games · could be zero
Lucky Ice Pop1 deck · 59 games with · in 67% of their lists
+2.2pp
+2.2pp · 90% range −11.8pp to +15.2pp · 59 games · could be zero
Hitmontop1 deck · 33 games with · in 12% of their lists
+2.6pp
+2.6pp · 90% range −12.0pp to +16.0pp · 33 games · could be zero
Cyrus1 deck · 27 games with · in 19% of their lists
−0.7pp
−0.7pp · 90% range −13.2pp to +13.8pp · 27 games · could be zero
Repel1 deck · 81 games with · in 89% of their lists
+2.4pp
+2.4pp · 90% range −13.3pp to +16.4pp · 81 games · could be zero
Field Blower1 deck · 44 games with · in 88% of their lists
−0.8pp
−0.8pp · 90% range −13.8pp to +14.4pp · 44 games · could be zero
Mars1 deck · 17 games with · in 79% of their lists
−0.2pp
−0.2pp · 90% range −15.0pp to +13.7pp · 17 games · could be zero
Starting Plains1 deck · 66 games with · in 7% of their lists
−1.6pp
−1.6pp · 90% range −16.2pp to +12.2pp · 66 games · could be zero
Riolu B3 791 deck · 61 games with · in 78% of their lists
−1.4pp
−1.4pp · 90% range −16.3pp to +13.0pp · 61 games · could be zero
Pheromosa1 deck · 26 games with · in 3% of their lists
−0.8pp
−0.8pp · 90% range −16.4pp to +12.5pp · 26 games · could be zero
Protective Poncho1 deck · 60 games with · in 44% of their lists
−3.9pp
−3.9pp · 90% range −17.5pp to +9.7pp · 60 games · could be zero
Riolu A2 911 deck · 72 games with · in 58% of their lists
−3.9pp
−3.9pp · 90% range −19.1pp to +11.1pp · 72 games · could be zero
Kartana1 deck · 23 games with · in 0% of their lists
−9.9pp
−9.9pp · 90% range −25.6pp to +5.0pp · 23 games · could be zero
Meta share0.40%Steady (−23%, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)range 0.25–0.64% ·196 entries ·110 pilots
Share of top cuts0.29%range 0.12–0.71% ·69 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (steady: −23%, within the noise). Data through Nov 9, 2026.
56.5%
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 43.6–69.4% · Record 5–5 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–5 · 10 games
55.9%
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 43.0–68.7% · Record 4–3–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–3–2 · 9 games
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.9–69.6% · Record 8–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
8–1 · 9 games
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.8–70.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
55.7%
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.6–69.8% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–0–1 · 1 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.6–69.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.6–69.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
52.9%
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 41.4–64.5% · Record 22–8 over 30 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
22–8 · 30 games
53.7%
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.5–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.8%
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.8–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 37.3–63.5% · Record 6–4–1 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–4–1 · 11 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.2–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.0%
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 37.1–63.0% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–3 · 7 games
50.9%
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.5–65.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.5–63.9% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.