Win rate54.0%Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)52.1–56.0 ·4.1k games
Adjusted for skill52.3%, trend steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)50.4–54.2 · average player
Vs the meta54.7%51.3–58.1 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.28×1.13–1.44 · vs expected
Pilot rating1527+13 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
2.5%range 2.05–3.12% · 766 entries
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 5.2% to 2.5%; low 0.58% (Oct 30), high 5.7% (Jul 22). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
5.2%
4.6–5.8%
378
Jul 20
5.6%
5.0–6.2%
465
Jul 27
5.5%
4.9–6.2%
517
Aug 3
3.7%
3.1–4.5%
615
Aug 10
3.2%
2.8–3.7%
724
Aug 17
3.4%
2.9–3.9%
773
Aug 24
2.6%
2.2–3.0%
790
Aug 31
3.0%
2.4–3.8%
846
Sep 7
2.5%
2.0–3.0%
923
Sep 14
1.7%
1.5–2.1%
965
Sep 21
1.7%
1.4–2.1%
982
Sep 28
1.6%
1.3–2.0%
995
Oct 5
1.3%
0.9–1.9%
1,009
Oct 12
1.7%
1.2–2.3%
1,028
Oct 19
1.6%
1.2–2.2%
1,036
Oct 26
1.5%
1.1–2.1%
1,038
Nov 2
0.75%
0.5–1.2%
881
Nov 9
2.5%
2.1–3.1%
766
Win rate
54.0%range 52.1–56.0% · 4,078 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Adjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 54.0% to 54.0%; low 52.5% (Oct 2), high 54.5% (Jul 16). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Jul 13
54.0%
52.1–55.9%
2,034
54.4%
Jul 20
53.9%
52.2–55.7%
2,464
54.3%
Jul 27
52.9%
51.2–54.6%
2,690
53.2%
Aug 3
53.1%
51.5–54.6%
3,210
52.5%
Aug 10
52.9%
51.5–54.4%
3,795
52.2%
Aug 17
52.5%
51.1–54.0%
4,026
51.9%
Aug 24
52.6%
51.2–54.1%
4,134
52.0%
Aug 31
53.5%
52.0–54.9%
4,462
52.6%
Sep 7
53.2%
51.8–54.6%
4,891
52.6%
Sep 14
53.4%
52.0–54.8%
5,131
52.6%
Sep 21
53.4%
52.0–54.8%
5,207
52.5%
Sep 28
53.1%
51.7–54.5%
5,262
52.1%
Oct 5
52.7%
51.2–54.1%
5,331
51.8%
Oct 12
53.3%
51.8–54.8%
5,447
52.3%
Oct 19
53.6%
52.1–55.2%
5,498
52.5%
Oct 26
53.5%
51.9–55.1%
5,500
52.2%
Nov 2
53.4%
51.6–55.2%
4,653
51.8%
Nov 9
54.0%
52.1–56.0%
4,078
52.3%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 417 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 42.7% · 90% range 33.9–51.6% · Record 45–68–6 over 119 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 45.1–64.4% · Record 20–21–1 over 42 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 55.0–70.8% · Record 89–57–4 over 150 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+7.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 38.9–62.0% · Record 9–13–2 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 40.8–59.2% · Record 36–35–3 over 74 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−4.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 35.9–54.0% · Record 52–74–3 over 129 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−4.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.1–71.1% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 46.1–72.8% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.4–69.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 45.8–64.0% · Record 49–40–5 over 94 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.9–72.9% · Record 7–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.8–73.9% · Record 7–0 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.7–72.6% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.4–72.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 42.3–64.7% · Record 18–10–4 over 32 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−9.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.4–73.3% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 51.2–67.6% · Record 55–46–2 over 103 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 65.4% · 90% range 52.2–78.5% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 46.4–72.3% · Record 10–6–1 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.6–75.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.7% · 90% range 54.7–80.7% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 49.3–76.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.4–76.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 48.2–71.0% · Record 25–19–3 over 47 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.6% · 90% range 56.6–82.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.2–64.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 73.3% · 90% range 60.9–85.6% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 45.0–68.4% · Record 20–11–2 over 33 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−39.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 37.6% · 90% range 28.4–46.9% · Record 22–50–3 over 75 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−9.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.6–72.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 39.0–58.8% · Record 34–45–2 over 81 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 48.5–76.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 45.2–67.8% · Record 33–22–3 over 58 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−10.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 39.0–66.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+34.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.9–67.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.8% · 90% range 51.9–79.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 51.2–71.6% · Record 34–23–6 over 63 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+5.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.2–74.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.8–78.1% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.8–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.9% · 90% range 30.1–59.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 53.1–81.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 42.7–71.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 46.9–71.5% · Record 13–5–1 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.4–74.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.1–74.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.7–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.6–73.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 47.6–67.8% · Record 22–15–4 over 41 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 33.1–61.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.0% · 90% range 54.4–81.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 41.6–61.9% · Record 27–32–1 over 60 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+3.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 49.4–73.0% · Record 11–10–1 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+34.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.7–67.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.7–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 50.4–75.1% · Record 12–5 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.2% · 90% range 56.6–81.9% · Record 3–0–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.5–73.7% · Record 6–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−19.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.9% · 90% range 53.7–80.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.9–73.1% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 39.9–64.0% · Record 18–14 over 32 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+35.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.1–73.8% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.8–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.6% · 90% range 27.5–55.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 31.4–60.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.3–76.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 50.7–76.6% · Record 9–2–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 46.2–68.8% · Record 20–12–2 over 34 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+10.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 42.4–64.1% · Record 12–15–2 over 29 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+19.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.8–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 32.2–63.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 48.7–76.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 43.5–69.5% · Record 5–8 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 44.6–69.9% · Record 5–6 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 38.0–63.9% · Record 2–9 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 42.1–67.7% · Record 5–3–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.2–66.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 42.5–67.7% · Record 7–6 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.9–68.4% · Record 2–6 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−18.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 40.3–66.6% · Record 6–5–2 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.7–65.8% · Record 5–6 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−31.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.9% · 90% range 57.1–80.6% · Record 13–2 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 47.9–75.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.8–74.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+21.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 43.9–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.8–77.4% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.5–74.2% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.5–73.4% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.5–76.4% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 42.9–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.9–65.4% · Record 4–7 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 49.9–77.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.3–80.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.3% · 90% range 35.2–59.3% · Record 5–18–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 35.6–63.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 41.6–67.5% · Record 6–11–1 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.7–72.5% · Record 4–7 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+25.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.3–74.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.0–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 38.4–62.7% · Record 6–17–3 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.9% · 90% range 54.5–81.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.7–68.0% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.9–74.8% · Record 7–1–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−41.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 46.0–73.1% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.0–73.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.3–77.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 50.1–77.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.9–68.4% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+30.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.7–72.5% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.5–69.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.2–77.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.7–73.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 43.6–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 72.1% · 90% range 59.0–85.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.4% · 90% range 58.2–80.6% · Record 12–1–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 49.8–77.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 37.7–62.1% · Record 6–9–2 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.6–71.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.6–70.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 47.8–75.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.4% · 90% range 55.6–79.2% · Record 11–2 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.3–75.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.9% · 90% range 54.9–81.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−23.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.7–75.5% · Record 6–7 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+34.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.7% · 90% range 57.3–84.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 40.7–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.4–67.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 45.7–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.0% · 90% range 54.6–81.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.8–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.4–73.2% · Record 5–5–1 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+30.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.5–69.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.3–76.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 46.5–75.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.5–76.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.7% · 90% range 54.3–81.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.4–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.9–72.7% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.7–66.0% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.7–67.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.9–71.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.6–77.5% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.0% · 90% range 55.4–80.6% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.9–70.0% · Record 2–5–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 37.2–63.9% · Record 2–7 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.2% · 90% range 54.1–80.2% · Record 6–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.6–65.5% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.6–77.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.5% · 90% range 55.2–81.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.3% · 90% range 54.1–80.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 47.1–70.5% · Record 10–5–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 53.0–80.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.0–75.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 50.1–75.2% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+35.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 47.4–66.5% · Record 23–18–3 over 44 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−9.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.6–73.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 46.3–69.6% · Record 8–7–2 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.5–70.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 38.5–67.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.7–72.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 51.7–76.7% · Record 8–3 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.7% · 90% range 51.5–78.0% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.5–73.0% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−21.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.4–73.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.3–75.4% · Record 2–2–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+34.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 50.2–76.5% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.1–75.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.0–71.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.6–77.8% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 48.9–73.2% · Record 8–6 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+25.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 50.0–77.2% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.5–76.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.9% · 90% range 53.6–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 40.6–65.4% · Record 3–10–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.5–74.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.7–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.8–72.6% · Record 5–3–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 50.0–76.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.4–75.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 49.2–75.2% · Record 8–3 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.8% · 90% range 56.3–83.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.9–78.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.8–64.1% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−22.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.2% · 90% range 53.7–80.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.9–71.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−22.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.4–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 48.8–79.7% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.6–70.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.2–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.8% · 90% range 53.9–77.7% · Record 10–3 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 47.5–73.3% · Record 5–4 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.1–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.7–75.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 51.7–78.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.9–75.4% · Record 3–5 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+39.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.6–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 36.6–59.6% · Record 11–18–1 over 30 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−25.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.5–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.3–65.2% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+21.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.9–78.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.8–73.5% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.4% · 90% range 53.2–79.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.1–70.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.9% · 90% range 57.1–82.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.4–77.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 38.3–65.2% · Record 0–4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.3% · 90% range 54.1–80.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.3–65.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.4–72.3% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 52.4–78.2% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.5–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 54.2–79.3% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.8–78.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.7% · 90% range 50.8–78.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 50.5–76.3% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.1% · 90% range 56.5–81.7% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.6–76.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.7–76.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.1–64.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.2–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.0–75.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 50.0–77.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 50.0–77.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.6% · 90% range 53.4–79.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.9–75.1% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.4–71.8% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.9% · 90% range 51.2–78.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.9% · 90% range 51.2–78.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.2–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 44.9–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.7% · 90% range 54.1–81.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.2–73.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 36.1–62.2% · Record 4–5–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+37.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.4–72.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 49.2–77.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.7–76.9% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.0–73.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.7% · 90% range 53.2–80.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.9–73.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.4–76.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 45.0–71.6% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+21.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 48.8–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.4–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.8–75.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.4% · 90% range 51.9–78.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.5–72.4% · Record 4–3–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.4–78.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.5–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.8–70.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.9% · 90% range 52.2–79.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.4–78.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.4% · 90% range 54.1–80.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.3–77.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.3–68.8% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 47.8–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.3–75.9% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.2–70.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.1–78.2% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 44.9–72.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.3–73.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+25.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 46.4–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.6% · 90% range 34.3–62.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 50.0–76.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 51.2–79.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.9–71.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.0–70.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−18.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.3–74.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.7–77.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.2–71.5% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.7–67.5% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.4–76.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 53.0–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.7–74.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.9% · 90% range 56.9–83.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.3–72.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.6–78.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.5–75.1% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.4–69.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.5–74.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.6–65.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.8% · 90% range 51.5–78.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.7–74.1% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.2–69.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 41.1–67.8% · Record 5–3 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 45.9–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 48.9–76.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.9–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.5–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.1–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.3% · 90% range 56.3–82.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.5–80.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.9% · 90% range 58.8–85.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.4–75.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 44.5–73.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.1% · 90% range 56.9–83.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.7–77.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.9% · 90% range 53.7–80.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+21.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.7% · 90% range 51.8–79.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 72.3% · 90% range 59.5–85.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 51.4–79.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.5% · 90% range 54.0–80.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.8–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.9–68.4% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.7–75.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.3% · 90% range 55.1–81.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.7–68.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 44.7–72.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.7–75.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.4% · 90% range 51.5–79.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.5–80.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.9% · 90% range 57.8–84.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.4–69.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 46.8–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.1% · 90% range 54.7–81.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.6–72.2% · Record 2–1–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.0–75.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.3–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.8% · 90% range 52.3–79.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 36.9–68.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 44.9–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.1–75.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.9% · 90% range 51.4–78.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.6–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 51.3–77.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.5–77.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 49.1–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.3–74.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 49.1–75.7% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.1–70.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.7–77.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.3–77.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.4% · 90% range 52.0–78.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.5–77.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 51.8–79.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.6–66.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 47.1–74.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.9% · 90% range 51.0–78.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 39.8–68.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.4–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.0–75.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.9–74.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.7–77.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 49.8–77.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 44.7–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.3–75.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.6–75.6% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.7–66.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.3–74.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.3–67.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.4–72.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.3–71.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.5–78.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 52.9–79.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.1–75.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.4% · 90% range 53.0–79.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.3–77.9% · Record 3–0–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.6% · 90% range 55.5–81.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 47.9–75.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 47.9–75.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.0% · 90% range 53.6–80.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 74.2% · 90% range 61.7–86.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.7% · 90% range 58.0–83.4% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 54.2–81.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.0–66.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.0–70.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.3–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.0–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.6–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.0–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.0–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 51.8–78.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.0–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.8–76.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 50.9–78.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.0–71.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.7–76.3% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 45.0–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 72.4% · 90% range 59.5–85.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.4% · 90% range 55.0–81.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.9–67.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.4–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.4% · 90% range 55.1–81.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.3–75.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.9–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.2–77.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.8% · 90% range 55.7–82.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.5–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.8–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.8–65.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.8–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.1–69.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.4–75.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.4–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.5–77.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.8% · 90% range 51.0–78.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.5–73.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.0% · 90% range 57.2–82.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.7–76.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 44.4–73.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.5–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.2–70.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.4% · 90% range 56.4–82.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.1–69.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 49.1–76.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.0–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 46.9–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 51.9–78.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)