Win rate46.5%Steady (+1.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)43.2–49.9 ·851 games
Adjusted for skill48.8%, trend steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)45.3–52.3 · average player
Vs the meta45.9%42.0–49.8 · sets the tier
Top cuts0.77×0.56–0.99 · vs expected
Pilot rating1501−16 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.20%range 0.11–0.35% · 186 entries
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 2.2% to 0.20%; low 0.15% (Sep 6), high 2.7% (Oct 8). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
2.2%
1.9–2.5%
177
Jul 20
1.9%
1.7–2.2%
194
Jul 27
1.6%
1.4–1.9%
204
Aug 3
0.61%
0.4–0.9%
217
Aug 10
0.49%
0.4–0.7%
233
Aug 17
0.42%
0.3–0.6%
234
Aug 24
0.47%
0.3–0.6%
241
Aug 31
0.22%
0.1–0.4%
244
Sep 7
0.19%
0.1–0.3%
249
Sep 14
0.30%
0.2–0.4%
261
Sep 21
0.40%
0.3–0.5%
268
Sep 28
0.36%
0.2–0.5%
270
Oct 5
2.0%
1.6–2.6%
303
Oct 12
2.3%
1.9–2.8%
337
Oct 19
1.8%
1.5–2.2%
347
Oct 26
1.8%
1.4–2.2%
358
Nov 2
0.21%
0.1–0.4%
244
Nov 9
0.20%
0.1–0.3%
186
Win rate
46.5%range 43.2–49.9% · 851 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Adjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 43.6% to 46.5%; low 42.7% (Aug 2), high 47.8% (Oct 3). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Jul 13
43.6%
40.8–46.5%
824
45.0%
Jul 20
43.3%
40.6–46.1%
882
44.7%
Jul 27
42.9%
40.2–45.6%
915
44.2%
Aug 3
42.8%
40.2–45.5%
987
43.5%
Aug 10
43.4%
40.8–46.0%
1,066
44.5%
Aug 17
43.4%
40.8–46.1%
1,068
44.5%
Aug 24
44.1%
41.5–46.8%
1,101
45.4%
Aug 31
44.1%
41.4–46.8%
1,116
45.5%
Sep 7
44.1%
41.4–47.0%
1,147
45.9%
Sep 14
44.9%
42.0–47.8%
1,209
46.9%
Sep 21
43.8%
40.9–46.8%
1,223
46.0%
Sep 28
43.2%
40.2–46.2%
1,229
45.3%
Oct 5
45.5%
42.4–48.8%
1,404
46.5%
Oct 12
45.8%
42.9–48.8%
1,560
47.5%
Oct 19
46.2%
43.3–49.2%
1,608
47.8%
Oct 26
45.7%
42.8–48.7%
1,650
48.0%
Nov 2
46.0%
42.8–49.1%
1,151
48.2%
Nov 9
46.5%
43.2–49.9%
851
48.8%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 165 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 43.5% · 90% range 31.9–55.1% · Record 11–14 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 32.2–59.5% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 39.5–58.6% · Record 26–26–3 over 55 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+15.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.7% · 90% range 27.9–55.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 36.3% · 90% range 26.5–46.2% · Record 16–27–3 over 46 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−13.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.3% · 90% range 31.4–59.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.7% · 90% range 30.8–58.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 39.3–57.1% · Record 32–28–3 over 63 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 42.2–62.4% · Record 24–28–4 over 56 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+14.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 37.0% · 90% range 25.4–48.5% · Record 4–13 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 34.2–58.2% · Record 13–14 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.8% · 90% range 28.5–53.1% · Record 5–13–1 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 37.8% · 90% range 26.0–49.5% · Record 7–12 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.0% · 90% range 32.2–53.7% · Record 13–23–1 over 37 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.2–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 34.6–62.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.1–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.0% · 90% range 29.1–55.0% · Record 3–7 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 33.9% · 90% range 20.7–47.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.7% · 90% range 33.6–59.8% · Record 6–4 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.2% · 90% range 30.7–53.8% · Record 9–11 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 38.0% · 90% range 25.5–50.4% · Record 6–6 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.2% · 90% range 30.9–57.4% · Record 2–3–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.8% · 90% range 33.6–58.0% · Record 9–7–1 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 42.8–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.9–64.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 37.2–64.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.7–70.3% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.2% · 90% range 33.1–61.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 30.6–57.5% · Record 2–9–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.7–68.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.1–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.6% · 90% range 29.1–56.1% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.4–67.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 31.8–59.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.7% · 90% range 28.9–54.5% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.2% · 90% range 29.4–57.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.1% · 90% range 27.2–54.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.8–64.5% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+22.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.8–64.3% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.9–77.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.8–65.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−32.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.9–61.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.1–71.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.4% · 90% range 29.6–57.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.8% · 90% range 29.2–56.3% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.6–68.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.8% · 90% range 30.8–58.7% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+36.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.9% · 90% range 29.4–56.3% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.1% · 90% range 28.4–55.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 36.8–62.8% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.8% · 90% range 35.3–62.4% · Record 1–6 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 43.0–70.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 38.1% · 90% range 25.0–51.1% · Record 1–5 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.2% · 90% range 30.6–55.9% · Record 5–5 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.6–65.6% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.4–66.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 33.7–61.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.6–65.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.1–64.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.6–65.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.0–68.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 34.7–61.3% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.8–66.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.0–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.0–72.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.3–67.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 33.8–62.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 35.5–62.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.0–74.2% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.5–69.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.5–65.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 38.5–64.4% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.7–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 38.0% · 90% range 24.6–51.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.6% · 90% range 31.0–56.2% · Record 3–5 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 39.6% · 90% range 26.0–53.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.0–64.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 33.9–62.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.8–64.5% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−25.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.2–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.3–64.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.8–69.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 37.9–66.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.1–67.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.1–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.7–62.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.8–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.1–73.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.8–65.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 35.0–63.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.3–67.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.5–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 38.1–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.5–69.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.0–64.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 39.9–68.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.0–66.0% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.3–68.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.0–65.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 37.6–66.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 48.8–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.3% · 90% range 33.0–59.7% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.5–67.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.5–63.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.3–69.6% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.0–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.4–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.9–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 32.7–60.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.3–66.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 48.7–76.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.0–68.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.1–68.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.6–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.6–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.5–74.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 32.7–60.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.1–67.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.5–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.4–78.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 34.3–62.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.8–65.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 35.8–64.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.1–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 40.9–69.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 35.2–63.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.5–65.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.5–65.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 34.7–62.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.7–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 35.9–64.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.6–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.8–68.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.6% · 90% range 29.4–57.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.7–68.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.4–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.6–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.8–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.5–68.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.3–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.1–63.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.8–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.2% · 90% range 32.8–61.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.3–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 33.6–61.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.8–71.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.9–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 39.0% · 90% range 25.4–52.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.5–66.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 34.8–63.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.0–61.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 35.1–63.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.7–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 43.7–73.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 49.3–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.4–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.2–76.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 36.9–65.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.5–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 34.9–63.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)