Adjusted for skill50.5%, trend −6.5pp (7-day vs 28-day)48.5–52.5 · average player
Vs the meta50.8%46.7–54.9 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.08×0.94–1.22 · vs expected
Pilot rating1520+5 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.36%range 0.21–0.59% · 485 entries
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 3.3% to 0.36%; low 0.26% (Nov 6), high 3.9% (Jul 31). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
3.3%
2.9–3.8%
633
Jul 20
3.5%
3.1–4.0%
687
Jul 27
3.3%
2.9–3.9%
715
Aug 3
2.2%
1.8–2.8%
779
Aug 10
1.3%
1.1–1.6%
813
Aug 17
1.2%
1.0–1.5%
822
Aug 24
1.3%
1.1–1.7%
842
Aug 31
0.63%
0.4–1.0%
853
Sep 7
1.2%
0.9–1.5%
898
Sep 14
2.1%
1.8–2.4%
989
Sep 21
1.9%
1.6–2.3%
1,004
Sep 28
1.8%
1.5–2.2%
1,019
Oct 5
2.7%
2.1–3.5%
882
Oct 12
2.2%
1.7–2.8%
714
Oct 19
2.2%
1.7–2.7%
684
Oct 26
1.7%
1.3–2.2%
663
Nov 2
0.30%
0.1–0.6%
582
Nov 9
0.36%
0.2–0.6%
485
Win rate
51.2%range 49.0–53.5% · 2,573 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Adjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 52.8% to 51.2%; low 51.2% (Nov 9), high 53.9% (Sep 7). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Jul 13
52.8%
51.2–54.4%
3,502
52.1%
Jul 20
53.3%
51.8–54.9%
3,775
52.6%
Jul 27
53.2%
51.7–54.8%
3,924
52.4%
Aug 3
52.2%
50.7–53.8%
4,237
51.5%
Aug 10
52.6%
51.0–54.1%
4,430
51.6%
Aug 17
52.4%
50.8–53.9%
4,470
51.4%
Aug 24
52.6%
51.0–54.1%
4,574
51.5%
Aug 31
52.9%
51.3–54.5%
4,635
51.9%
Sep 7
53.9%
52.2–55.6%
4,900
52.9%
Sep 14
53.4%
51.7–55.2%
5,409
52.3%
Sep 21
53.6%
51.9–55.3%
5,485
52.6%
Sep 28
53.2%
51.4–54.9%
5,556
52.3%
Oct 5
52.9%
51.0–54.7%
4,781
52.0%
Oct 12
53.0%
51.1–54.9%
3,871
51.8%
Oct 19
52.9%
50.9–54.8%
3,737
51.8%
Oct 26
52.4%
50.4–54.4%
3,619
51.4%
Nov 2
52.2%
50.1–54.3%
3,127
51.4%
Nov 9
51.2%
49.0–53.5%
2,573
50.5%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
Limitless names this deck in several ways, after the Pokémon a list runs. Each version shows its share of the deck, its win rate adjusted for skill and the cards that set it apart.
Version · share of the deckAdjusted for skillSets it apart
Mega Blaziken ex GreninjaMost played
90% of this deck's entriesentries455
Adjusted for skill
50.2%
2.4k games
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 48.1–52.4% · 2,424 games
Sets it apart
Greninja100% of its lists · 0% of the rest
Teal Mask Ogerpon ex0% of its lists · 98% of the rest
Sabrina1% of its lists · 94% of the rest
Mega Blaziken ex Teal Mask Ogerpon ex
9.2% of this deck's entriesentries27
Adjusted for skill
54.1%
140 games
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 46.2–61.7% · 140 games · too few games to call
Worth under 300 games once older ones are discounted, so a rough guide
Sets it apart
Teal Mask Ogerpon ex100% of its lists · 0% of the rest
Greninja0% of its lists · 100% of the rest
Sabrina96% of its lists · 1% of the rest
Mega Blaziken ex Heatmor
0.6% of this deck's entriesentries3
Adjusted for skill
32.5%
9 games
Win rate 32.5% · 90% range 8.2–72.3% · 9 games · too few games to call
Worth under 300 games once older ones are discounted, so a rough guide
Sets it apart
Too few of its lists to tell
Card usage
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 311 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.9–63.2% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.1% · 90% range 37.2–55.0% · Record 35–40–2 over 77 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−12.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.9–65.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.9–63.2% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 36.5–54.9% · Record 25–30–4 over 59 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−3.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 34.3% · 90% range 24.7–43.9% · Record 12–42–5 over 59 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−15.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 41.2–61.0% · Record 45–34–2 over 81 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.0–64.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 35.6–63.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.0% · 90% range 33.7–52.2% · Record 25–43–4 over 72 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+20.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.2–65.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.0–65.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 34.8–57.0% · Record 18–23–4 over 45 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.4–64.4% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.8% · 90% range 52.2–79.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.5–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 40.9–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.4% · 90% range 34.4–58.5% · Record 12–10 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−42.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.7% · 90% range 31.4–58.1% · Record 2–4–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 42.2–60.9% · Record 30–28–3 over 61 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−20.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 35.2–61.7% · Record 12–7–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 41.0–67.6% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.1% · 90% range 54.7–81.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 40.0–67.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 46.2–69.3% · Record 11–9 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 40.7–69.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.4–73.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 42.1–69.0% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 38.2–62.1% · Record 9–16–1 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.4% · 90% range 35.3–59.6% · Record 10–13–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.7% · 90% range 58.3–83.0% · Record 6–0 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.5–77.0% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.4–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.4–69.3% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.7% · 90% range 52.6–78.8% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 34.0–62.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.1–64.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.2–66.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.9–66.1% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+24.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 49.9–74.6% · Record 11–6 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−45.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 37.9–63.1% · Record 8–8–1 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.9–69.7% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.2% · 90% range 50.6–75.9% · Record 6–4 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−40.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 35.0–62.0% · Record 3–4–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−18.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 39.5–63.5% · Record 7–8–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 40.3–67.3% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+38.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.8–71.5% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.6% · 90% range 28.4–54.9% · Record 4–9 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.4% · 90% range 30.5–58.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+39.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 46.3–70.1% · Record 8–7–2 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.3–65.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.3–74.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.0–75.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 34.1–61.2% · Record 5–3 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.5–72.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.6% · 90% range 32.9–56.3% · Record 10–11–2 over 23 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.4% · 90% range 30.9–57.9% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−15.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.2% · 90% range 54.9–77.5% · Record 12–7–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+22.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.8–70.2% · Record 6–4–1 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.8–70.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 38.8–62.9% · Record 14–9–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−40.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 33.4–60.2% · Record 6–14–1 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.9–70.0% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.8–74.8% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 42.8–71.5% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.7–67.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.5–75.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.4% · 90% range 33.9–61.0% · Record 2–3–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−28.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.9% · 90% range 50.2–77.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 46.4–72.6% · Record 2–3–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.4–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.5–71.0% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+39.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.8–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.7–71.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.3–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.4–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.7–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.4–80.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.4–64.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+28.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.2–77.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.2–71.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.7–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.3–74.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 53.0–79.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.4–63.5% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.3% · 90% range 49.6–74.9% · Record 6–1–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.5–76.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.1% · 90% range 55.2–81.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.6–68.6% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 34.5–62.0% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 45.8–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 41.9–70.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−26.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 43.9–67.1% · Record 11–10 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.1–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.1–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.1–69.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 35.5–63.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 40.5–62.8% · Record 13–11–1 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.6–61.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 39.5–66.2% · Record 3–3–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 37.9–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.1–71.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.5% · 90% range 52.4–78.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 54.4–78.6% · Record 6–2–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.3–69.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.2–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.7–69.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.3–63.6% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.1–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.9–73.0% · Record 2–1–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.4–71.2% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 35.9–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.6–74.6% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.5–70.1% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.4–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.7–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 38.7–64.4% · Record 5–4–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.6% · 90% range 54.6–80.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.7–74.0% · Record 4–1–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.4–64.8% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−37.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.7–79.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.8–69.1% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+24.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.4% · 90% range 53.9–80.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 49.1–75.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 47.1–74.0% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.3–71.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.2–73.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 47.9–75.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.4–77.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 49.8–76.2% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.7–70.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−37.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.4% · 90% range 32.3–60.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.3–73.1% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.3–73.6% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.3–71.1% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 38.9–64.7% · Record 4–4–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−36.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.3–72.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.2–74.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 46.9–74.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.7% · 90% range 51.3–78.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.2–72.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 42.0–69.1% · Record 2–3–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.3–76.2% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.2–66.9% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.3–71.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 47.0–74.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.9% · 90% range 59.3–84.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.5–69.8% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.2–69.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.7% · 90% range 55.7–81.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.7–74.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.4–66.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−26.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.2–74.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.0–66.0% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.7% · 90% range 58.0–83.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.9–76.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.9–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.3–75.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 34.6–63.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.7–68.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.8–70.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−21.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.8–70.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.7–72.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.3% · 90% range 57.5–83.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.9–68.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.3–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.4–67.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.4–65.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 53.9–80.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 52.7–79.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.7–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 50.1–77.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.5–78.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 48.0–75.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.6–70.9% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.5–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.5–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.9–77.8% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.4–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.4% · 90% range 54.1–80.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.4–76.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.0–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 30.2–58.5% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−23.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.3–74.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.7–65.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 72.7% · 90% range 59.9–85.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.1–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 34.9–63.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.0–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.6–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 45.7–74.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.0% · 90% range 53.9–80.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.1–71.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 44.8–73.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 40.8–70.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.3–76.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.5–77.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.9–71.7% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.5–70.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.5–67.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.3–71.8% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 34.3–62.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.0–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.1–66.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.8–76.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.2–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 53.0–79.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 53.5–79.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.2–69.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.9% · 90% range 50.2–77.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.4–77.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.5% · 90% range 52.3–78.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.4–72.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.5–76.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.2–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.2% · 90% range 29.5–56.9% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−25.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 51.7–79.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.7–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.0–66.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.7–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.7–65.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.6% · 90% range 34.4–62.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.2–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.8% · 90% range 59.3–84.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.2% · 90% range 56.2–82.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.9% · 90% range 52.7–79.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 36.7–63.1% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.9% · 90% range 52.2–79.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.1% · 90% range 57.3–82.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 73.4% · 90% range 61.0–85.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.0–66.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 49.1–76.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.8–71.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.1% · 90% range 32.1–60.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.6% · 90% range 54.3–80.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 54.2–81.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.8–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.3–68.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.0–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.1–69.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.1% · 90% range 55.1–81.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 33.8–62.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.3–74.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.7% · 90% range 56.8–82.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 51.8–78.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.8–78.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.2% · 90% range 58.2–84.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.0–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.6–69.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.9% · 90% range 56.9–82.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.3–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.3% · 90% range 57.6–83.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.6% · 90% range 32.2–61.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.0–64.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.9–64.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.4–66.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−24.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.2–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.0–64.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.5–69.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.2% · 90% range 57.4–83.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.8–73.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 37.6–66.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 49.9–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.0–71.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 36.6–66.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.0–70.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 35.5–63.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.3–72.7% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.1–72.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.0–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.2% · 90% range 55.0–81.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.1–67.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.3–61.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 44.6–73.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.4–67.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 43.9–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.1–74.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.9–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 38.3–67.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.5–64.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.3–74.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.6–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.4–75.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 43.9–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 75.0% · 90% range 62.9–87.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.7–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.9–76.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.4–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 45.8–74.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.8% · 90% range 53.3–80.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.2–68.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.5–67.8% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 42.9–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.3–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.5–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.4% · 90% range 58.1–82.7% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.6–75.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.6% · 90% range 57.8–83.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 42.5–72.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.0–71.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.2–78.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)