Win rate45.9%Too few recent games (measured −11.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day)41.5–50.4 ·542 games
Adjusted for skill48.6%, trend too few recent games (measured −11.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day)44.1–53.0 · average player
Vs the meta50.5%45.8–55.1 · sets the tier
Top cuts0.69×0.37–1.01 · vs expected
Pilot rating1492−19 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.09%range 0.04–0.22% · 110 entries
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 0.64% to 0.09%; low 0.07% (Oct 30), high 0.71% (Sep 11). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
0.64%
0.5–0.8%
100
Jul 20
0.51%
0.4–0.7%
104
Jul 27
0.62%
0.5–0.8%
112
Aug 3
0.45%
0.3–0.7%
124
Aug 10
0.30%
0.2–0.5%
133
Aug 17
0.33%
0.2–0.5%
137
Aug 24
0.45%
0.3–0.6%
145
Aug 31
0.38%
0.2–0.6%
153
Sep 7
0.54%
0.4–0.8%
170
Sep 14
0.50%
0.4–0.7%
190
Sep 21
0.45%
0.3–0.6%
193
Sep 28
0.45%
0.3–0.6%
197
Oct 5
0.22%
0.1–0.5%
183
Oct 12
0.19%
0.1–0.4%
158
Oct 19
0.37%
0.2–0.6%
147
Oct 26
0.27%
0.1–0.5%
140
Nov 2
0.11%
0.0–0.3%
132
Nov 9
0.09%
0.0–0.2%
110
Win rate
45.9%range 41.5–50.4% · 542 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Adjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 44.8% to 45.9%; low 44.8% (Jul 13), high 52.2% (Sep 7). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Jul 13
44.8%
41.0–48.7%
498
45.6%
Jul 20
45.0%
41.2–48.8%
517
46.0%
Jul 27
48.6%
44.9–52.4%
563
49.3%
Aug 3
51.0%
47.4–54.6%
641
51.3%
Aug 10
49.8%
46.2–53.4%
682
50.5%
Aug 17
48.9%
45.3–52.5%
700
49.8%
Aug 24
48.1%
44.5–51.8%
739
49.1%
Aug 31
48.0%
44.4–51.7%
770
49.2%
Sep 7
52.2%
48.6–55.7%
885
53.8%
Sep 14
49.9%
46.5–53.3%
970
52.8%
Sep 21
49.6%
46.2–53.0%
974
52.6%
Sep 28
49.6%
46.2–53.0%
992
52.5%
Oct 5
48.6%
45.1–52.1%
903
51.3%
Oct 12
48.8%
45.2–52.5%
779
51.4%
Oct 19
47.3%
43.4–51.1%
710
50.1%
Oct 26
46.7%
42.8–50.7%
670
49.4%
Nov 2
46.6%
42.4–50.8%
627
49.0%
Nov 9
45.9%
41.5–50.4%
542
48.6%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 140 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 46.6% · 90% range 34.1–59.0% · Record 7–10–1 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−26.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.3% · 90% range 34.9–59.7% · Record 11–6 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−42.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.5–64.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 35.6–61.3% · Record 8–4–1 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 38.8% · 90% range 27.4–50.2% · Record 6–19–2 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 41.8–60.3% · Record 34–29–2 over 65 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 44.9% · 90% range 31.5–58.3% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 36.0–60.9% · Record 7–13 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+34.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.4% · 90% range 32.7–56.2% · Record 8–11 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 36.1–62.0% · Record 9–2 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 39.0–66.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 34.6–59.6% · Record 6–7 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 42.1–69.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 34.9–60.0% · Record 9–13 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−24.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 34.4–62.0% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+38.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.8% · 90% range 36.7–60.8% · Record 8–10–2 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+28.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.9–65.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.7–78.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 32.7–59.2% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.3% · 90% range 29.3–57.3% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 38.6–65.0% · Record 6–4 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 38.0–65.0% · Record 4–3–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.3% · 90% range 31.4–59.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 34.4–63.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.4–63.5% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.5–70.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 42.2–68.4% · Record 4–3–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−31.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.0–66.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 34.2–61.8% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.4–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.6–66.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.2–65.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 34.1–61.4% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 35.7–63.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 34.8–63.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 35.6–62.5% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.9–68.6% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.9–75.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.7–64.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+37.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.4–70.3% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−28.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.1–61.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 35.2–62.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 46.1–73.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.3% · 90% range 50.8–77.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.6–64.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.4% · 90% range 32.7–60.2% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 36.0–63.3% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+30.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.4–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 44.9–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 38.1–64.5% · Record 3–2–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 32.5–59.9% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.1–68.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.6–65.2% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.1–70.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 51.6–77.3% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.6–70.5% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.3–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 34.9–63.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.1–68.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.2–63.9% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.0–70.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 36.9–62.8% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.7–66.1% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 45.7–71.8% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.8–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.5–69.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.1–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.6–65.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.8–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.1–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.2–70.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.4–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.3–67.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 43.1–70.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 39.9–68.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−22.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.0–71.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.6% · 90% range 54.4–80.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.6–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.6–69.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.5–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.5–75.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.0–65.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 41.2–68.3% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.6–69.4% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.9–69.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 53.0–79.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.1–69.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.8–73.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.8–73.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.2–72.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 51.1–77.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.6–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.6–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.3–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 47.1–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.6–71.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.5–74.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.3% · 90% range 56.6–82.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.9–66.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 35.1–64.0% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.3–75.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.0–69.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.7–75.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.1–69.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.1–71.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.1–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.9–74.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 44.9–73.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 48.0–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.5–71.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.0–73.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.7–69.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.1–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 48.0–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.4–72.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.4–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.3–69.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.6–72.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.4–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.6–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.6–61.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.1–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 47.0–74.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.3–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 39.8–68.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.8–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.3–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 52.0–78.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.4–69.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 35.7–63.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.3–68.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.2% · 90% range 51.6–78.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.3–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.9–74.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.1–69.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 35.4–63.2% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.7–72.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.4–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.6–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)