Win rate51.5%Too few recent games (measured −11.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day)47.7–55.2 ·595 games
Adjusted for skill49.7%, trend too few recent games (measured −12.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day)45.8–53.5 · average player
Vs the meta50.2%46.0–54.4 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.26×0.98–1.53 · vs expected
Pilot rating1532+13 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.09%range 0.03–0.24% · 107 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Aug 2 – Nov 9: 0.04% to 0.09%; low 0.01% (Nov 8), high 1.2% (Sep 27). Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 3
0.07% (few)
0.0–0.2%
2
Aug 10
0.10% (few)
0.0–0.2%
6
Aug 17
0.12% (few)
0.1–0.2%
9
Aug 24
0.10% (few)
0.0–0.2%
10
Aug 31
0.13% (few)
0.0–0.3%
12
Sep 7
0.45%
0.3–0.7%
28
Sep 14
0.83%
0.7–1.1%
70
Sep 21
0.71%
0.5–0.9%
74
Sep 28
1.2%
1.0–1.5%
95
Oct 5
0.57%
0.3–1.0%
100
Oct 12
0.40%
0.2–0.7%
103
Oct 19
0.43%
0.3–0.7%
104
Oct 26
0.33%
0.2–0.6%
105
Nov 2
0.03%
0.0–0.2%
105
Nov 9
0.09%
0.0–0.2%
107
Win rate
51.5%range 47.7–55.2% · 595 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Aug 2 – Nov 9: 0.0% to 51.5%; low 0.0% (Aug 2), high 56.4% (Sep 24). Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Aug 3
0.0% (few)
0.0–47.5%
3
11.7%
Aug 10
41.5% (few)
26.1–58.8%
22
47.1%
Aug 17
41.4% (few)
28.6–55.5%
34
43.4%
Aug 24
43.1% (few)
31.0–56.2%
40
43.5%
Aug 31
35.7% (few)
24.8–48.3%
45
37.5%
Sep 7
55.2%
48.4–61.7%
157
54.9%
Sep 14
52.5%
48.2–56.7%
391
50.7%
Sep 21
53.1%
49.0–57.1%
420
51.9%
Sep 28
53.5%
49.8–57.1%
531
51.9%
Oct 5
52.9%
49.3–56.5%
561
51.3%
Oct 12
53.1%
49.5–56.6%
580
51.4%
Oct 19
53.1%
49.5–56.6%
582
51.4%
Oct 26
52.6%
49.0–56.2%
584
50.9%
Nov 2
52.6%
49.0–56.2%
584
50.9%
Nov 9
51.5%
47.7–55.2%
595
49.7%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 130 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 37.9–63.0% · Record 6–4–2 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.5–64.1% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.5% · 90% range 33.6–57.3% · Record 11–10 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−39.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 34.3–62.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 38.3% · 90% range 26.3–50.3% · Record 4–14–2 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 38.8–59.8% · Record 17–15–3 over 35 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+10.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 41.2–60.3% · Record 26–19–2 over 47 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 45.9–65.2% · Record 27–21–2 over 50 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−40.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 35.9–60.8% · Record 7–7 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+30.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.5% · 90% range 32.5–56.6% · Record 6–10 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 46.1–68.2% · Record 19–7–1 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+4.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 32.3–57.9% · Record 3–5–1 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 34.1–57.8% · Record 9–7–1 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−18.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 33.9–61.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.6% · 90% range 28.6–52.6% · Record 1–14–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 38.9–62.3% · Record 12–7 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 38.0–58.8% · Record 14–19–2 over 35 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−18.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.5–69.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.2% · 90% range 31.4–58.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.3% · 90% range 27.5–55.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 37.5–62.3% · Record 8–5–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−26.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 36.5–60.5% · Record 8–7–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.7–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.4–61.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.2% · 90% range 31.3–57.2% · Record 2–7 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+32.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.3–66.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.8–70.9% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 36.8–62.5% · Record 6–3 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.3–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 34.4–62.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.3% · 90% range 47.5–75.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.6–69.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.9% · 90% range 30.3–55.6% · Record 3–6 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 34.1–62.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 33.0–60.7% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−18.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.2–69.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.8–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 43.0–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 35.1–62.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−37.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.3–73.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.5–66.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.3% · 90% range 33.4–59.3% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.6% · 90% range 32.7–60.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 44.1–71.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.4–67.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.2–70.2% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 35.5–61.2% · Record 4–2–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.2–61.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 40.2–65.1% · Record 4–7–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.8–69.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 38.1–63.5% · Record 6–3 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.2% · 90% range 31.8–58.6% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.5–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.5–71.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.4–66.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 43.3–70.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.8–65.3% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.5–70.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.5–73.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–68.0% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.0% · 90% range 50.2–77.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.5–72.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.4–66.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.2–68.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.4–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 38.7–62.8% · Record 6–6–1 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 33.8–61.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 34.6–62.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.9–66.2% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.6–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.1–68.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.7–69.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 41.9–70.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.0–61.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.0–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.8–70.1% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.1–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.4–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 46.3–73.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.4–69.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.9–61.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.1–67.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.1–72.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.1–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.4–67.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.2–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.4–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.5–66.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.7–69.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.9–77.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.4–70.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.9–63.2% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 40.4–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.1–70.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.2–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.5–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.3–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 45.1–72.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.5–77.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.5–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 47.5–75.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.8–76.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 33.7–62.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 53.0–79.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.0–72.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.8–71.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.5% · 90% range 52.4–78.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.1–77.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.2–68.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.6–78.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.4–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.2–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.6–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 48.1–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.2% · 90% range 47.6–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 53.1–79.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.4–66.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.2–70.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.4% · 90% range 53.9–80.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.3–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 34.7–62.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.3% · 90% range 53.9–80.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.0% · 90% range 52.6–79.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.4–66.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.4–68.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.6–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.8–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.4–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.2–68.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 53.9–80.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)