Win rate53.6%Too few recent games (measured −2.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day)49.5–57.8 ·654 games
Adjusted for skill52.0%, trend too few recent games (measured −1.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day)47.9–56.2 · average player
Vs the meta53.6%49.4–57.9 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.17×0.81–1.52 · vs expected
Pilot rating1529+12 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.05%range 0.01–0.14% · 128 entries
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 0.74% to 0.05%; low 0.05% (Nov 9), high 1.7% (Jul 29). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
0.74%
0.6–0.9%
299
Jul 20
1.1%
0.9–1.3%
321
Jul 27
1.4%
1.2–1.7%
339
Aug 3
0.60%
0.4–0.9%
358
Aug 10
0.24%
0.2–0.4%
361
Aug 17
0.26%
0.2–0.4%
362
Aug 24
0.31%
0.2–0.5%
367
Aug 31
0.13%
0.1–0.3%
369
Sep 7
0.25%
0.2–0.4%
378
Sep 14
0.15%
0.1–0.2%
381
Sep 21
0.13%
0.1–0.2%
382
Sep 28
0.36%
0.3–0.5%
390
Oct 5
0.58%
0.4–0.9%
293
Oct 12
0.91%
0.7–1.3%
192
Oct 19
0.83%
0.6–1.1%
170
Oct 26
0.84%
0.6–1.2%
157
Nov 2
0.11%
0.0–0.3%
141
Nov 9
0.05%
0.0–0.1%
128
Win rate
53.6%range 49.5–57.8% · 654 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Adjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 53.1% to 53.6%; low 52.5% (Sep 5), high 55.6% (Oct 13). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Jul 13
53.1%
51.0–55.2%
1,596
51.0%
Jul 20
53.9%
51.8–56.0%
1,716
51.8%
Jul 27
54.5%
52.4–56.6%
1,817
52.4%
Aug 3
54.4%
52.3–56.6%
1,905
52.5%
Aug 10
54.4%
52.3–56.5%
1,920
52.7%
Aug 17
54.3%
52.2–56.4%
1,925
52.5%
Aug 24
53.7%
51.5–55.9%
1,946
52.4%
Aug 31
53.3%
51.0–55.5%
1,953
52.0%
Sep 7
52.5%
50.1–54.9%
1,995
51.4%
Sep 14
52.7%
50.2–55.2%
2,011
51.2%
Sep 21
52.7%
50.2–55.2%
2,015
51.1%
Sep 28
53.3%
50.4–56.1%
2,060
51.3%
Oct 5
55.1%
51.7–58.4%
1,551
52.8%
Oct 12
55.6%
51.7–59.4%
1,014
53.5%
Oct 19
53.8%
49.9–57.7%
878
51.8%
Oct 26
54.1%
50.1–58.0%
805
52.2%
Nov 2
53.8%
49.7–57.9%
720
52.1%
Nov 9
53.6%
49.5–57.8%
654
52.0%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 126 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 41.1–67.2% · Record 4–6 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 47.0–68.5% · Record 28–21–3 over 52 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+8.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.5% · 90% range 32.0–57.0% · Record 3–9 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 38.3–60.7% · Record 18–19–1 over 38 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+8.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.7–68.3% · Record 12–5 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 30.6–57.4% · Record 2–7 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.5% · 90% range 32.4–56.6% · Record 6–13 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 37.3–61.6% · Record 17–6–3 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 43.0–67.3% · Record 12–6 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.7–67.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 44.2–67.6% · Record 14–7–1 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.1% · 90% range 29.1–53.2% · Record 1–11–1 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 38.0–63.0% · Record 9–6–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.6–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.6–66.1% · Record 3–1–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.2–64.1% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 44.4–70.7% · Record 5–2–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.8–66.6% · Record 14–6–1 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 41.4–66.9% · Record 8–3 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 38.0–65.3% · Record 1–1–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 39.3–65.9% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+30.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 44.1–69.4% · Record 5–5 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 38.0–64.4% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 34.9–61.6% · Record 2–4–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.4–70.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.9% · 90% range 51.6–78.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.3–68.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 49.7–77.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.4–66.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 35.6–62.3% · Record 3–1–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.3–66.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.5–67.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 35.6–62.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.4–70.7% · Record 6–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.0–68.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 40.1–67.5% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.4–68.2% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.3–71.1% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 36.2–63.4% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+39.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 48.1–75.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.8–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.7–66.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.2–75.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 34.2–61.6% · Record 1–4–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 34.5–62.2% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 36.0–63.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.4–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.0–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.0–68.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.8–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 41.1–68.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.1–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 41.3–67.2% · Record 6–3 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.5–75.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.8–74.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−22.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.2–74.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.7–77.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.8–73.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.3–66.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.3–68.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.8–64.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 38.1–65.7% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 48.2–75.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.7–69.7% · Record 1–2–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.7–70.6% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.9–66.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.8–64.9% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 48.7–71.9% · Record 12–3 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.6–65.4% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.4–72.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.3–68.2% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.5–68.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.0–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.6–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.9–75.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.1–73.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.5–70.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.1–70.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.9–73.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.5–69.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.7–71.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−26.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 34.7–63.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 46.7–74.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.5–76.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 46.9–74.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.6–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 45.6–72.7% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 40.5–63.8% · Record 6–8–3 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.9–68.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.1–71.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.8–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.3–74.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.9% · 90% range 50.3–77.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.0% · 90% range 45.5–74.4% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−23.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.0% · 90% range 51.3–78.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 49.2–76.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.0–64.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 48.1–75.1% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 30.9–59.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 52.2–79.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.0–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.5–74.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.6–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.2–70.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 48.1–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.6–66.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.2–73.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.6–77.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.4–76.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 41.9–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.9% · 90% range 49.2–76.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.4–75.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.7–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 47.9–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.0–72.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.1–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 34.4–62.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.1–77.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.3–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.0% · 90% range 52.6–79.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.7% · 90% range 47.7–75.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.7–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.0–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.6–72.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)