Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
No deck is clearly favored. 2 lean ahead, but each range reaches below 50%.
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Greninja Mega Absol ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Greninja Mega Absol ex yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
11 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Greninja Mega Absol ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 0.74% to 0.05%; low 0.05% (Nov 9), high 1.7% (Jul 29).Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
0.74%
0.6–0.9%
299
Jul 20
1.1%
0.9–1.3%
321
Jul 27
1.4%
1.2–1.7%
339
Aug 3
0.60%
0.4–0.9%
358
Aug 10
0.24%
0.2–0.4%
361
Aug 17
0.26%
0.2–0.4%
362
Aug 24
0.31%
0.2–0.5%
367
Aug 31
0.13%
0.1–0.3%
369
Sep 7
0.25%
0.2–0.4%
378
Sep 14
0.15%
0.1–0.2%
381
Sep 21
0.13%
0.1–0.2%
382
Sep 28
0.36%
0.3–0.5%
390
Oct 5
0.58%
0.4–0.9%
293
Oct 12
0.91%
0.7–1.3%
192
Oct 19
0.83%
0.6–1.1%
170
Oct 26
0.84%
0.6–1.2%
157
Nov 2
0.11%
0.0–0.3%
141
Nov 9
0.05%
0.0–0.1%
129
Tier
BTier B
vs meta 53.6% (49.4–57.9)
MagnezoneMiraidon ex(B1a/B3a)
Win rate vs it54.9%, trend steady (−9.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)44–66%range ·28–24
Sabrina1 deck · 29 games with · in 52% of their lists
+6.2pp
+6.2pp · 90% range −8.4pp to +20.2pp · 29 games · could be zero
Lucky Ice Pop1 deck · 20 games with · in 67% of their lists
+5.2pp
+5.2pp · 90% range −9.5pp to +19.5pp · 20 games · could be zero
Field Blower1 deck · 25 games with · in 11% of their lists
+1.5pp
+1.5pp · 90% range −11.5pp to +16.7pp · 25 games · could be zero
Sawk1 deck · 14 games with · in 12% of their lists
+3.4pp
+3.4pp · 90% range −12.0pp to +18.7pp · 14 games · could be zero
Soothing Shore1 deck · 19 games with · in 43% of their lists
+0.7pp
+0.7pp · 90% range −12.1pp to +15.7pp · 19 games · could be zero
Riolu1 deck · 39 games with · in 58% of their lists
+3.3pp
+3.3pp · 90% range −12.4pp to +18.9pp · 39 games · could be zero
Starting Plains1 deck · 23 games with · in 2% of their lists
+0.2pp
+0.2pp · 90% range −12.7pp to +15.6pp · 23 games · could be zero
Protective Poncho1 deck · 33 games with · in 44% of their lists
+0.9pp
+0.9pp · 90% range −13.3pp to +15.4pp · 33 games · could be zero
Mars1 deck · 26 games with · in 73% of their lists
−2.3pp
−2.3pp · 90% range −14.3pp to +12.4pp · 26 games · could be zero
Bonsly1 deck · 26 games with · in 85% of their lists
−1.1pp
−1.1pp · 90% range −15.4pp to +13.9pp · 26 games · could be zero
Rocky Helmet1 deck · 24 games with · in 2% of their lists
−2.9pp
−2.9pp · 90% range −17.2pp to +12.6pp · 24 games · could be zero
Meta share0.05%−86%range 0.01–0.14% ·129 entries ·71 pilots
Share of top cuts0.05%range 0.01–0.35% ·46 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (falling −86%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 9, 2026.
55.5%
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 43.4–67.6% · Record 13–6 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
13–6 · 19 games
55.5%
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 43.1–67.9% · Record 9–3 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
9–3 · 12 games
56.0%
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.7–69.3% · Record 7–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–2 · 9 games
54.9%
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.0–68.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.1%
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.4–65.7% · Record 4–1–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–1–1 · 6 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 38.4–62.4% · Record 6–18–3 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–18–3 · 27 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 38.4–65.0% · Record 4–2–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–2–1 · 7 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.8–65.5% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–0–1 · 1 games
51.0%
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.6–64.4% · Record 1–3–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–3–1 · 5 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.6–65.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.7%
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 37.1–64.4% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.0–65.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.5–63.9% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–1 · 4 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.4–64.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.