Win rate52.4%Too few recent games (measured −3.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day)48.4–56.3 ·675 games
Adjusted for skill52.5%, trend too few recent games (measured −5.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day)48.9–56.1 · average player
Vs the meta49.0%44.7–53.3 · sets the tier
Top cuts0.98×0.74–1.23 · vs expected
Pilot rating1511about even vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.00%range 0.00–0.07% · 134 entries
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 2.3% to 0.00%; low 0.00% (Nov 9), high 2.5% (Jul 29). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
2.3%
2.0–2.6%
144
Jul 20
2.1%
1.8–2.4%
169
Jul 27
2.3%
2.0–2.7%
195
Aug 3
0.86%
0.6–1.2%
217
Aug 10
0.43%
0.3–0.6%
227
Aug 17
0.56%
0.4–0.7%
233
Aug 24
0.44%
0.3–0.6%
236
Aug 31
0.42%
0.3–0.7%
243
Sep 7
0.65%
0.5–0.9%
269
Sep 14
0.32%
0.2–0.4%
273
Sep 21
0.31%
0.2–0.4%
276
Sep 28
0.25%
0.2–0.4%
277
Oct 5
0.11%
0.0–0.3%
278
Oct 12
0.05%
0.0–0.2%
277
Oct 19
0.06%
0.0–0.2%
275
Oct 26
0.04%
0.0–0.2%
270
Nov 2
0.00%
0.0–0.1%
250
Nov 9
0.00%
0.0–0.1%
134
Win rate
52.4%range 48.4–56.3% · 675 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Adjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 55.0% to 52.4%; low 51.8% (Aug 24), high 55.4% (Jul 14). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Jul 13
55.0%
51.7–58.2%
779
53.3%
Jul 20
54.6%
51.6–57.6%
915
52.7%
Jul 27
54.1%
51.2–57.0%
1,037
52.9%
Aug 3
52.6%
49.9–55.4%
1,149
52.3%
Aug 10
52.0%
49.3–54.8%
1,190
51.8%
Aug 17
52.2%
49.5–55.0%
1,226
52.4%
Aug 24
51.8%
49.0–54.5%
1,236
52.0%
Aug 31
53.8%
50.9–56.6%
1,286
53.6%
Sep 7
54.3%
51.4–57.1%
1,414
53.9%
Sep 14
53.7%
50.8–56.5%
1,436
53.4%
Sep 21
53.6%
50.7–56.4%
1,448
53.2%
Sep 28
53.4%
50.5–56.3%
1,449
53.0%
Oct 5
53.2%
50.2–56.1%
1,454
52.7%
Oct 12
53.2%
50.2–56.1%
1,449
52.7%
Oct 19
53.2%
50.2–56.1%
1,433
52.7%
Oct 26
53.1%
50.2–56.1%
1,403
52.6%
Nov 2
52.8%
49.6–55.8%
1,276
52.5%
Nov 9
52.4%
48.4–56.3%
675
52.5%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 155 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 40.7–65.3% · Record 10–3–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 39.7% · 90% range 29.3–50.1% · Record 12–24–2 over 38 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−13.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 39.3% · 90% range 27.0–51.6% · Record 5–5–1 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−29.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.8% · 90% range 32.3–53.3% · Record 17–26–6 over 49 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−24.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 35.5–54.5% · Record 20–32–4 over 56 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−9.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 38.2–64.2% · Record 9–2 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 39.8–64.3% · Record 11–5 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 42.5–64.8% · Record 20–7–1 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+6.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 40.4–63.4% · Record 18–11–1 over 30 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+25.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 36.4% · 90% range 23.8–48.9% · Record 1–9 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 39.6% · 90% range 27.2–52.0% · Record 1–10 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 32.8–60.2% · Record 0–0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 37.8–63.8% · Record 7–5 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.0–68.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 33.9–59.7% · Record 3–3–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 36.6% · 90% range 23.3–49.9% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 42.0–65.9% · Record 11–4 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 35.3–61.1% · Record 4–4–2 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+36.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 31.8% · 90% range 20.2–43.4% · Record 0–11 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.5% · 90% range 31.3–55.6% · Record 6–6 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 40.3–67.0% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.7–65.9% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−38.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 37.1–63.3% · Record 4–1–3 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.2–71.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 51.2–77.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 35.3–61.5% · Record 4–2–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.7–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.0% · 90% range 33.3–60.7% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.6% · 90% range 31.0–56.2% · Record 4–8 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 31.5–58.6% · Record 2–0–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.5–68.1% · Record 5–1–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.5–67.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+14.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.3–71.5% · Record 1–0–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.0–67.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−20.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 30.6–57.4% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.3–68.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.6–68.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 39.0–66.3% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.3–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.9–65.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.6–67.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 34.1–61.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−38.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.2–67.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.8–70.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.9% · 90% range 32.5–57.3% · Record 5–4–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 36.2–59.5% · Record 8–6–3 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.9–67.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 32.2–59.8% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.2–68.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.3–69.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.8–66.8% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.2–68.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.2–71.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.8–72.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.7% · 90% range 47.0–74.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 30.8–57.7% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 46.9–75.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.3–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.2% · 90% range 30.4–58.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.4–71.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.0–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.4–65.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.3–67.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.2–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.4–68.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 41.8–67.5% · Record 7–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.3% · 90% range 28.6–56.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 39.0–63.6% · Record 8–5 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.9% · 90% range 30.2–57.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.1–71.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.9–69.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.8–67.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−24.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.6–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.1–68.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.5–65.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.7–68.3% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+47.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.2–69.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 38.0–65.1% · Record 0–2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.5–66.2% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.3–69.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 39.1–66.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.8% · 90% range 39.9–67.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.8–73.0% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.5–67.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.0–69.7% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.4–65.1% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.3–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.5–71.5% · Record 2–0–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.4–70.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.3–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.1–69.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.4–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.0–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.0–64.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.3–71.7% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.5% · 90% range 46.8–74.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.5–65.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.4% · 90% range 32.9–62.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.4–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 32.3–60.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.3–71.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.6–72.4% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.7–66.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.3–66.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.3–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 49.0–75.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.1–69.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.9–67.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.3–64.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.2–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.3–69.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 35.0–63.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.8–65.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.9% · 90% range 31.0–58.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 41.5–70.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.7–73.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.4–67.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.3–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.6–76.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 43.0–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 50.0–77.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.8–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 34.8–62.5% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.0% · 90% range 52.5–79.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 42.0–69.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.4–74.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 45.6–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.7–68.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 45.2–72.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.2% · 90% range 28.4–56.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.8–68.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.0–66.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.2–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.7–64.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.1–77.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.5–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.7–72.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 45.8–74.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.3–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.8–70.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.0–75.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.6–72.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.4–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.9% · 90% range 50.5–77.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.0% · 90% range 48.9–77.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.0–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.8–70.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.7–64.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.4–66.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.6–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.1–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)