Its win rate48.9%Steady (+0.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)45.9–51.8 ·926 games
Top-cut share3.4%2.31–4.87% ·48 entries
Window
Games
120d
Best decks against Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
4 favored counters (whole range above 50%), 5 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
Top 24 of 26 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Oct 29 – Nov 11: 1.5% to 3.1%; low 1.5% (Oct 29), high 4.2% (Nov 1).Show data (14 days of Meta share)
Meta share by day: value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Oct 29
1.5% (few)
0.7–3.2%
10
Oct 30
3.4%
2.2–5.4%
37
Oct 31
4.1%
2.9–5.7%
77
Nov 1
4.2%
3.0–5.7%
88
Nov 2
3.7%
2.7–5.0%
94
Nov 3
3.5%
2.5–4.8%
102
Nov 4
3.3%
2.4–4.5%
114
Nov 5
3.4%
2.5–4.5%
119
Nov 6
3.5%
2.6–4.6%
134
Nov 7
3.5%
2.6–4.6%
135
Nov 8
3.5%
2.7–4.6%
149
Nov 9
3.5%
2.7–4.6%
163
Nov 10
3.4%
2.6–4.4%
171
Nov 11
3.1%
2.4–4.0%
173
1.06× expected (0.81–1.32)
TierDTier Dvs meta 49.3% (45.5–53.2)
Hoopa exMega Absol ex
Win rate vs it68.1%, trend steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)59–77%range ·32–10
Serena's Choice5 decks · 188 games with · in 63% of their lists
+2.0pp
+2.0pp · 90% range −4.9pp to +8.9pp · 188 games · could be zero
May2 decks · 98 games with · in 62% of their lists
+3.6pp
+3.6pp · 90% range −6.3pp to +13.6pp · 98 games · could be zero
Giant Cape4 decks · 112 games with · in 40% of their lists
+0.5pp
+0.5pp · 90% range −6.8pp to +7.9pp · 112 games · could be zero
Froakie B1 711 deck · 27 games with · in 41% of their lists
+5.4pp
+5.4pp · 90% range −9.4pp to +18.8pp · 27 games · could be zero
Oricorio1 deck · 27 games with · in 80% of their lists
+7.2pp
+7.2pp · 90% range −9.6pp to +22.8pp · 27 games · could be zero
Copycat4 decks · 131 games with · in 50% of their lists
−2.5pp
−2.5pp · 90% range −9.8pp to +4.8pp · 131 games · could be zero
Inflatable Boat1 deck · 17 games with · in 20% of their lists
+4.6pp
+4.6pp · 90% range −9.9pp to +18.0pp · 17 games · could be zero
Pokémon Center Lady2 decks · 87 games with · in 59% of their lists
+0.9pp
+0.9pp · 90% range −9.9pp to +11.6pp · 87 games · could be zero
X Speed1 deck · 30 games with · in 58% of their lists
+4.8pp
+4.8pp · 90% range −10.3pp to +17.1pp · 30 games · could be zero
Mega Sableye ex1 deck · 24 games with · in 48% of their lists
+3.7pp
+3.7pp · 90% range −11.8pp to +16.4pp · 24 games · could be zero
Irida1 deck · 27 games with · in 34% of their lists
+1.8pp
+1.8pp · 90% range −12.1pp to +15.0pp · 27 games · could be zero
Soothing Shore2 decks · 70 games with · in 68% of their lists
−2.1pp
−2.1pp · 90% range −13.4pp to +9.1pp · 70 games · could be zero
Zeraora1 deck · 28 games with · in 28% of their lists
+2.8pp
+2.8pp · 90% range −13.5pp to +18.9pp · 28 games · could be zero
Mega Absol ex1 deck · 25 games with · in 42% of their lists
+1.4pp
+1.4pp · 90% range −13.9pp to +14.4pp · 25 games · could be zero
Sabrina1 deck · 28 games with · in 30% of their lists
−0.6pp
−0.6pp · 90% range −15.3pp to +14.4pp · 28 games · could be zero
Wally1 deck · 83 games with · in 83% of their lists
−1.7pp
−1.7pp · 90% range −15.3pp to +11.9pp · 83 games · could be zero
Mars1 deck · 30 games with · in 46% of their lists
−2.1pp
−2.1pp · 90% range −15.6pp to +11.4pp · 30 games · could be zero
Blue's Provocation1 deck · 65 games with · in 72% of their lists
−3.3pp
−3.3pp · 90% range −16.4pp to +9.8pp · 65 games · could be zero
Repel1 deck · 17 games with · in 24% of their lists
−2.2pp
−2.2pp · 90% range −16.7pp to +12.2pp · 17 games · could be zero
Professor Turo1 deck · 37 games with · in 87% of their lists
−1.2pp
−1.2pp · 90% range −17.1pp to +15.2pp · 37 games · could be zero
Charmander1 deck · 85 games with · in 88% of their lists
−3.2pp
−3.2pp · 90% range −17.8pp to +11.5pp · 85 games · could be zero
Eviolite1 deck · 24 games with · in 67% of their lists
−4.7pp
−4.7pp · 90% range −18.3pp to +11.3pp · 24 games · could be zero
Pokémon Communication1 deck · 14 games with · in 18% of their lists
−4.9pp
−4.9pp · 90% range −19.8pp to +10.3pp · 14 games · could be zero
Froakie C1 401 deck · 44 games with · in 61% of their lists
−6.7pp
−6.7pp · 90% range −20.7pp to +7.9pp · 44 games · could be zero
Meta share3.1%+99%range 2.41–4.02% ·173 entries ·106 pilots
Share of top cuts3.4%range 2.31–4.87% ·48 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (rising +99%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 11, 2026.
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 40.4–63.2% · Record 13–7–1 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Leans on the prediction.
13–7–1 · 21 games
50.6%
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 40.1–61.0% · Record 14–15–3 over 32 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
14–15–3 · 32 games
62.2%
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.5–76.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
57.2%
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 44.0–70.5% · Record 0–5 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–5 · 5 games
56.7%
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 43.0–70.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.9–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 42.7–72.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
56.2%
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.7–69.7% · Record 2–1–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1–1 · 4 games
55.5%
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 42.5–68.5% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–3 · 7 games
56.5%
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.4–70.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.6–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.4–69.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.4–69.4% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
55.0%
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 40.7–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.7%
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.5–69.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 40.4–68.4% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–2 · 6 games
53.7%
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.7–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.7–68.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
53.5%
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.3–67.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
53.1%
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.1–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 38.8–67.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.3%
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 38.8–63.9% · Record 5–6 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–6 · 11 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.5–66.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 38.4–65.3% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–4 · 8 games
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.1–66.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.1–66.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.7–65.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.6%
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 37.5–65.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.1%
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.9–65.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.5%
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.7–64.2% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–4 · 4 games
50.6%
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.4–64.8% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
50.0%
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.1–63.9% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–3 · 4 games
51.1%
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.1–66.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.1–64.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.1–64.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.