Win rate47.1%Too few recent games (measured −2.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day)42.5–51.8 ·432 games
Adjusted for skill46.8%, trend too few recent games (measured −6.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day)42.0–51.6 · average player
Vs the meta50.3%45.4–55.2 · sets the tier
Top cuts0.97×0.64–1.30 · vs expected
Pilot rating1511about even vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.13%range 0.06–0.27% · 79 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Aug 29 – Nov 9: 0.12% to 0.13%; low 0.04% (Nov 5), high 1.1% (Sep 1). Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (11 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 31
0.73% (few)
0.5–1.1%
15
Sep 7
0.73%
0.5–1.0%
41
Sep 14
0.51%
0.4–0.7%
57
Sep 21
0.49%
0.4–0.7%
61
Sep 28
0.51%
0.4–0.7%
66
Oct 5
0.28%
0.1–0.6%
69
Oct 12
0.21%
0.1–0.4%
71
Oct 19
0.32%
0.2–0.5%
74
Oct 26
0.24%
0.1–0.5%
75
Nov 2
0.06%
0.0–0.2%
76
Nov 9
0.13%
0.1–0.3%
79
Win rate
47.1%range 42.5–51.8% · 432 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Aug 29 – Nov 9: 50.1% to 47.1%; low 43.4% (Sep 4), high 50.1% (Aug 29). Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (11 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Aug 31
45.0% (few)
36.3–54.1%
82
40.8%
Sep 7
44.0%
38.5–49.7%
212
41.0%
Sep 14
46.0%
41.3–50.8%
300
44.1%
Sep 21
48.2%
43.7–52.8%
330
46.8%
Sep 28
49.3%
44.9–53.8%
359
48.4%
Oct 5
49.7%
45.3–54.0%
380
49.4%
Oct 12
49.1%
44.8–53.5%
390
48.7%
Oct 19
48.4%
44.0–52.7%
406
49.0%
Oct 26
47.8%
43.4–52.1%
408
48.5%
Nov 2
47.1%
42.7–51.5%
412
48.1%
Nov 9
47.1%
42.5–51.8%
432
46.8%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 112 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 37.6–63.3% · Record 6–7–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.5–67.0% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.3% · 90% range 29.7–52.9% · Record 10–18 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−28.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.5–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.9% · 90% range 34.9–61.0% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 31.0–57.1% · Record 1–12–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+50.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.7–68.9% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 39.8–68.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 35.2–57.8% · Record 15–20–1 over 36 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+47.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 39.8–64.1% · Record 11–4 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.8–63.7% · Record 4–2–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−35.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 37.8% · 90% range 26.8–48.8% · Record 8–12–1 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 36.4% · 90% range 23.4–49.3% · Record 2–9–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.7% · 90% range 33.9–59.6% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 41.1–67.0% · Record 5–4 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 34.1–61.1% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 39.6% · 90% range 26.9–52.4% · Record 6–7 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−31.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.4–66.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 34.9–62.0% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.9% · 90% range 29.1–56.6% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 37.2–61.8% · Record 6–9–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 33.9–61.1% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−24.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 37.1–64.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.8% · 90% range 34.5–63.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.1–72.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.3% · 90% range 33.9–60.8% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 35.9–63.6% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+30.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.5% · 90% range 31.9–59.1% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−46.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.4–69.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.4% · 90% range 31.4–59.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 35.2–63.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.8% · 90% range 29.9–57.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.7% · 90% range 27.6–53.8% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 33.6–61.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.2–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.1–76.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.9% · 90% range 30.9–58.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.8–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.3–67.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.8–72.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.0% · 90% range 33.1–60.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.0–73.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.1–66.8% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.1–72.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 30.7–57.9% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.5% · 90% range 26.9–54.0% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.5–70.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 35.3–61.5% · Record 3–6 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.6% · 90% range 32.6–60.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 44.7–73.0% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.2–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 53.7–79.3% · Record 6–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.6–72.1% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.2–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.7% · 90% range 49.0–76.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.5% · 90% range 52.1–78.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.2–67.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.9–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.2–70.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.5–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 34.9–61.9% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.5–69.3% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−35.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.1–71.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.7–66.4% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 46.8–75.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.5–69.5% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.0–72.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.7–73.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.8–73.7% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−26.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.2% · 90% range 31.1–59.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.7% · 90% range 55.8–81.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.1–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 41.7–73.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.1% · 90% range 26.0–54.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.4% · 90% range 32.4–60.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 42.2–69.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.4–68.5% · Record 0–2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.5–70.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.8–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.0–68.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.2–75.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 43.7–72.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.3–69.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.3–70.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.5–69.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 51.1–77.9% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.1–71.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.3–75.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.7–71.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 69.1% · 90% range 56.1–82.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.5–66.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.7–71.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 33.9–62.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 46.5–75.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 43.9–72.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 38.8–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.8–73.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 34.4–62.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 38.7–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.4–73.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 42.9–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 49.9–77.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.6–66.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.7–69.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 33.4–62.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.5–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 44.8–73.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.5–72.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.0–72.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 42.9–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.3% · 90% range 51.7–78.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)