Meta share0.32%Steady (−12%, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)0.19–0.54% ·66 entries
Win ratefew games49.7%Steady (−2.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)44.8–54.6 ·333 games
Adjusted for skillfew games48.5%, trend steady (−2.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)43.6–53.5 · average player
Vs the metafew games52.1%45.9–58.3 · sets the tier
Top cutsfew games1.06×0.72–1.40 · vs expected
Pilot rating1528+9 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.32%range 0.19–0.54% · 66 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 0.02% to 0.32%; low 0.00% (Aug 11), high 0.95% (Oct 28). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
0.02% (few)
0.0–0.1%
2
Jul 20
0.01% (few)
0.0–0.1%
2
Jul 27
0.01% (few)
0.0–0.1%
2
Aug 3
0.00% (few)
0.0–0.1%
2
Aug 10
0.00% (few)
0.0–0.1%
2
Aug 17
0.00% (few)
0.0–0.1%
2
Aug 24
0.03% (few)
0.0–0.1%
3
Aug 31
0.05% (few)
0.0–0.2%
4
Sep 7
0.14% (few)
0.1–0.3%
9
Sep 14
0.06% (few)
0.0–0.1%
10
Sep 21
0.07% (few)
0.0–0.2%
11
Sep 28
0.38%
0.3–0.6%
21
Oct 5
0.61%
0.4–1.0%
32
Oct 12
0.77%
0.5–1.2%
43
Oct 19
0.68%
0.5–1.0%
47
Oct 26
0.91%
0.6–1.3%
55
Nov 2
0.25%
0.1–0.5%
58
Nov 9
0.32%
0.2–0.5%
66
Win rate
49.7%range 44.8–54.6% · 333 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 40.0% to 49.7%; low 21.0% (Aug 22), high 53.4% (Oct 26). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Jul 13
40.0% (few)
20.0–64.8%
10
37.4%
Jul 20
40.0% (few)
20.0–64.8%
10
37.4%
Jul 27
40.0% (few)
20.0–64.8%
10
37.4%
Aug 3
40.0% (few)
20.0–64.8%
10
37.4%
Aug 10
40.0% (few)
20.0–64.8%
10
37.4%
Aug 17
40.0% (few)
20.0–64.8%
10
37.4%
Aug 24
21.0% (few)
20.0–46.1%
15
33.4%
Aug 31
24.8% (few)
20.0–47.6%
18
41.5%
Sep 7
43.2% (few)
31.2–56.1%
47
46.5%
Sep 14
42.8% (few)
31.4–55.0%
52
46.8%
Sep 21
50.9% (few)
39.8–61.9%
61
52.6%
Sep 28
51.6%
43.6–59.6%
116
50.1%
Oct 5
49.4%
42.7–56.0%
167
46.9%
Oct 12
48.9%
43.1–54.7%
221
45.8%
Oct 19
49.4%
43.8–55.0%
242
45.6%
Oct 26
53.4%
48.2–58.5%
294
51.5%
Nov 2
51.4%
46.3–56.4%
299
50.6%
Nov 9
49.7%
44.8–54.6%
333
48.5%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 72 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 45.1% · 90% range 31.4–58.8% · Record 0–7 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.5–67.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 34.8–60.3% · Record 7–7 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.0–67.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+8.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 35.1–62.9% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 34.3–63.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.5% · 90% range 38.1–60.9% · Record 11–13–2 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+2.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 47.8–71.8% · Record 8–11 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 33.8–58.6% · Record 6–9–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.7–64.0% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 40.3–64.7% · Record 12–7–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.2% · 90% range 33.4–61.0% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−34.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.6–68.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.2–68.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 42.9–66.8% · Record 14–5 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−23.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 41.9–70.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.0–71.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 36.6–60.4% · Record 8–12–1 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+21.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 38.1–64.0% · Record 5–5 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+22.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.2–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 42.3–69.1% · Record 5–3 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+6.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.0–71.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.5–67.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 44.3–74.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.6–71.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.7–64.4% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 32.6–61.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 34.5–61.9% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−21.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 32.4–59.0% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 35.0–62.7% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.4–69.0% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.4% · 90% range 51.1–79.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 42.6–69.1% · Record 3–2–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.9–76.0% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−36.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.5–67.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.4% · 90% range 29.2–57.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 39.6–69.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−19.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.6–71.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 68.2% · 90% range 54.7–81.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 45.9–75.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 36.9–65.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.2–66.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.0% · 90% range 32.1–59.9% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−11.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 34.8–63.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 45.0–72.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.3–69.8% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 34.7–62.0% · Record 1–1–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.0–68.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.4–71.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.3–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.0–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 41.6–70.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 37.0–64.6% · Record 0–5 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 42.6–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.1–66.3% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.4–62.2% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 42.9–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.3–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.0–73.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 42.7–71.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.3% · 90% range 49.0–77.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.3–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 41.1–70.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.9–70.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.0–70.4% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 51.7–79.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 40.9–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.5% · 90% range 50.7–78.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.6% · 90% range 40.1–69.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.1–71.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)