Win ratefew games50.5%Too few recent games (measured −15.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day)44.2–56.7 ·348 games
Adjusted for skillfew games51.7%, trend too few recent games (measured −15.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day)45.9–57.4 · average player
Vs the metafew games48.8%44.0–53.6 · sets the tier
Top cutsfew games0.95×0.60–1.31 · vs expected
Pilot rating1500−8 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.02%range 0.00–0.10% · 69 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 0.01% to 0.02%; low 0.00% (Jul 31), high 0.91% (Aug 23). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
0.01% (few)
0.0–0.1%
3
Jul 20
0.00% (few)
0.0–0.1%
3
Jul 27
0.00% (few)
0.0–0.1%
3
Aug 3
0.03% (few)
0.0–0.1%
4
Aug 10
0.45%
0.3–0.6%
24
Aug 17
0.61%
0.5–0.8%
39
Aug 24
0.85%
0.7–1.1%
56
Aug 31
0.35%
0.2–0.6%
62
Sep 7
0.17%
0.1–0.3%
66
Sep 14
0.16%
0.1–0.3%
69
Sep 21
0.14%
0.1–0.2%
70
Sep 28
0.10%
0.1–0.2%
70
Oct 5
0.02%
0.0–0.2%
69
Oct 12
0.04%
0.0–0.2%
69
Oct 19
0.04%
0.0–0.1%
69
Oct 26
0.02%
0.0–0.1%
68
Nov 2
0.04%
0.0–0.2%
69
Nov 9
0.02%
0.0–0.1%
69
Win rate
50.5%range 44.2–56.7% · 348 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 27.5% to 50.5%; low 27.5% (Jul 13), high 54.0% (Aug 8). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (18 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Jul 13
27.5% (few)
20.0–60.0%
7
27.6%
Jul 20
27.5% (few)
20.0–60.0%
7
27.6%
Jul 27
27.5% (few)
20.0–60.0%
7
27.6%
Aug 3
43.6% (few)
20.0–60.0%
13
50.8%
Aug 10
43.4%
34.4–52.9%
108
40.9%
Aug 17
50.2%
43.4–57.1%
200
49.7%
Aug 24
51.6%
45.8–57.4%
282
52.0%
Aug 31
52.1%
46.5–57.6%
315
53.3%
Sep 7
51.8%
46.3–57.2%
327
53.2%
Sep 14
51.7%
46.2–57.0%
341
52.7%
Sep 21
52.2%
46.8–57.6%
345
53.3%
Sep 28
52.2%
46.8–57.6%
345
53.3%
Oct 5
52.3%
46.8–57.6%
342
53.3%
Oct 12
52.2%
46.6–57.7%
346
53.5%
Oct 19
52.2%
46.6–57.7%
346
53.5%
Oct 26
52.3%
46.7–57.8%
342
53.6%
Nov 2
50.5%
44.2–56.7%
348
51.7%
Nov 9
50.5%
44.2–56.7%
348
51.7%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 98 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 36.4–63.1% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+22.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.5–73.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.0% · 90% range 34.8–59.3% · Record 8–11–1 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+41.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.8% · 90% range 30.7–56.8% · Record 3–5 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.9% · 90% range 27.9–56.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 34.3–58.8% · Record 8–6 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 35.3–54.7% · Record 21–17–4 over 42 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+9.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 39.2–65.2% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.6% · 90% range 29.5–55.7% · Record 1–5 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 40.8–64.7% · Record 12–4 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 36.1–62.8% · Record 7–2 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.5–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.4% · 90% range 28.3–54.6% · Record 3–6 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+5.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 37.9–66.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.5% · 90% range 32.2–56.8% · Record 10–8 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−39.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.5% · 90% range 29.7–57.4% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−27.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.7% · 90% range 40.5–68.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 36.2–62.4% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.4–73.2% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+15.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 38.0–64.1% · Record 5–4 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 35.0% · 90% range 22.8–47.2% · Record 1–8–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 33.9–61.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 38.0–65.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.9% · 90% range 32.1–59.6% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+34.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 37.0% · 90% range 23.8–50.3% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 39.3–65.2% · Record 7–0 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–68.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.2% · 90% range 30.2–58.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 34.1–62.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.5% · 90% range 30.4–58.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 36.1–62.3% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.6–63.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.2% · 90% range 30.0–56.4% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 39.4–67.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.1–63.8% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.9% · 90% range 26.9–54.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.0–66.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.3–68.5% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.2% · 90% range 33.3–61.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.5–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.7% · 90% range 26.0–55.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.3–63.7% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−30.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.4–64.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.5–66.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.8–66.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−21.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.8% · 90% range 29.2–56.4% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 35.6–64.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 45.9–73.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.3–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.4–76.2% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.4% · 90% range 32.1–60.6% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.1–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.7–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.5% · 90% range 30.2–58.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.4% · 90% range 31.3–59.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.4–64.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.3–65.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.5–73.9% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.1–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.6–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 35.1–63.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 45.0–72.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.4–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.5% · 90% range 29.7–57.2% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.2–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.8–67.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.0–68.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 40.8–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.5% · 90% range 34.3–62.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.9% · 90% range 51.6–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.2–69.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 40.8–69.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.2–67.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.4–65.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.7–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.8–69.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.8% · 90% range 38.6–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.9% · 90% range 29.5–58.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 38.9–67.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.2–70.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.0–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.7% · 90% range 32.5–60.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.1–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.0–66.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.6–66.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.4–67.5% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.2–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 31.8–59.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.3–70.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 38.5–68.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.8% · 90% range 51.2–78.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.3–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.2–68.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.7–69.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.3–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.6–77.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 35.8–64.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)