Win rate53.1%Steady (+1.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)50.0–56.1 ·1.8k games
Adjusted for skill51.7%, trend steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)48.9–54.5 · average player
Vs the meta52.9%49.2–56.5 · sets the tier
Top cuts1.34×1.11–1.56 · vs expected
Pilot rating1525+10 vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.45%range 0.29–0.70% · 339 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 0.55% to 0.45%; low 0.14% (Oct 12), high 3.1% (Aug 10). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 3
3.1%
2.6–3.7%
92
Aug 10
3.1%
2.7–3.6%
199
Aug 17
2.3%
2.0–2.7%
217
Aug 24
1.8%
1.5–2.1%
232
Aug 31
0.55%
0.3–0.9%
239
Sep 7
0.54%
0.4–0.8%
257
Sep 14
0.75%
0.6–1.0%
284
Sep 21
0.61%
0.5–0.8%
286
Sep 28
0.56%
0.4–0.8%
290
Oct 5
0.35%
0.2–0.7%
297
Oct 12
0.14%
0.1–0.4%
297
Oct 19
0.58%
0.4–0.9%
304
Oct 26
1.4%
1.1–1.9%
322
Nov 2
0.50%
0.3–0.8%
331
Nov 9
0.45%
0.3–0.7%
339
Win rate
53.1%range 50.0–56.1% · 1,840 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 58.3% to 53.1%; low 51.4% (Sep 26), high 58.3% (Jul 30). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Aug 3
55.5%
51.6–59.3%
514
52.7%
Aug 10
54.1%
51.4–56.7%
1,102
52.5%
Aug 17
53.3%
50.7–55.8%
1,184
51.9%
Aug 24
53.0%
50.5–55.5%
1,262
51.9%
Aug 31
52.8%
50.4–55.3%
1,300
51.6%
Sep 7
52.3%
49.9–54.8%
1,389
51.0%
Sep 14
52.3%
49.9–54.7%
1,546
51.2%
Sep 21
52.2%
49.8–54.6%
1,555
51.1%
Sep 28
51.4%
49.0–53.9%
1,577
50.6%
Oct 5
52.1%
49.6–54.5%
1,615
51.0%
Oct 12
52.1%
49.6–54.5%
1,615
51.0%
Oct 19
52.7%
50.1–55.3%
1,651
51.8%
Oct 26
52.3%
49.5–55.1%
1,731
51.5%
Nov 2
52.7%
49.7–55.6%
1,782
51.3%
Nov 9
53.1%
50.0–56.1%
1,840
51.7%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 250 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 49.2–69.1% · Record 43–24–4 over 71 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−1.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.5–69.7% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.2% · 90% range 36.1–56.4% · Record 30–40–3 over 73 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 45.0–69.1% · Record 9–4–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.7% · 90% range 34.3–53.0% · Record 36–73–3 over 112 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+17.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 35.0–54.9% · Record 32–35–2 over 69 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−18.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 42.4–69.2% · Record 2–1–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.5–65.8% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 51.5–70.0% · Record 57–25–3 over 85 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+10.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.9% · 90% range 37.7–62.2% · Record 9–8 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 43.7–62.2% · Record 56–44–7 over 107 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+14.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 38.3% · 90% range 29.1–47.5% · Record 35–66–5 over 106 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−5.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.4% · 90% range 29.0–51.8% · Record 19–25–3 over 47 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 41.7–69.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.4–67.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 44.3–71.1% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 45.4–67.4% · Record 27–13–2 over 42 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (+8.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.4–66.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.6–64.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.7% · 90% range 36.2–63.2% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 48.0–65.2% · Record 95–44–5 over 144 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 45.6% · 90% range 34.1–57.2% · Record 10–12 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.8% · 90% range 30.7–52.9% · Record 12–19–3 over 34 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−14.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 44.8–70.0% · Record 7–3 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.1% · 90% range 52.7–79.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.6–67.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 43.5–72.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.2–73.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 34.7–59.5% · Record 8–13–1 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+21.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 38.8–62.9% · Record 4–11–2 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 41.5–65.6% · Record 10–12 over 22 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+42.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.7% · 90% range 33.6–59.9% · Record 3–4–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.6–63.3% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.8–66.2% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 40.5–66.0% · Record 9–6–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−4.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 45.0–70.9% · Record 7–3 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−15.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.9% · 90% range 36.2–61.6% · Record 8–8–1 over 17 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−35.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 32.3–57.6% · Record 1–8 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.4% · 90% range 48.8–76.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 43.2–70.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+10.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.9–66.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.3–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 38.0–65.1% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.8% · 90% range 32.0–57.6% · Record 5–14 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+58.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 41.3–66.5% · Record 8–4–2 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−10.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.8–70.4% · Record 7–3 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.1% · 90% range 44.6–73.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 38.5–65.0% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−29.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.8–67.3% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+4.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.1–68.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 40.5–67.3% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.6–70.8% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.8% · 90% range 32.0–57.7% · Record 2–7–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−17.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.5% · 90% range 33.5–59.5% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 43.8–69.3% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.9% · 90% range 53.7–80.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.1% · 90% range 47.8–74.3% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 46.0–72.7% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.7–77.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 35.2–63.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.9–65.8% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.9% · 90% range 30.0–55.8% · Record 0–8 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.4% · 90% range 31.9–58.9% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−6.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 42.2–70.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.4% · 90% range 35.0–61.8% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−15.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.6–66.6% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 33.8–62.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.2–69.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 39.0–64.7% · Record 3–6 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+27.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.9–61.4% · Record 1–3–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−13.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.4% · 90% range 45.5–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.7% · 90% range 50.9–76.4% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.2–70.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.8–71.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 40.2–67.6% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.2% · 90% range 35.3–63.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.1–70.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.0–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 51.3–77.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.9–72.7% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−3.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.6% · 90% range 49.3–75.9% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.6–71.5% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 47.0–71.5% · Record 6–6 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.9% · 90% range 53.6–80.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.1% · 90% range 46.2–74.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.9% · 90% range 44.2–71.5% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.5% · 90% range 48.3–76.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.9–75.0% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.1–67.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 38.8–67.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.2–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.8% · 90% range 33.0–60.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.6–65.8% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.9–77.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.2% · 90% range 44.5–71.9% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.6–77.6% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 41.9–70.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−0.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 35.9–62.0% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−12.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.7–70.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.9–73.6% · Record 4–0–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 44.5–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.5–66.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 43.6–69.1% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.7–70.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.3–64.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.7–65.1% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.4–65.6% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−28.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.4–71.5% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−2.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.5–70.0% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−32.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.6–68.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.4–72.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 70.1% · 90% range 57.5–82.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.6–69.3% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+19.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.5–65.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.8–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.6% · 90% range 44.4–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.0–65.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.7–75.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.0% · 90% range 47.7–74.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.2–71.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.9% · 90% range 47.9–73.8% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+1.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.3–71.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.5–70.6% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+9.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.4–68.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.0–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 42.8–70.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 49.0–73.7% · Record 9–4 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−39.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.9–66.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.2–67.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 45.1–71.1% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.1% · 90% range 53.9–80.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 47.1–73.3% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.0–69.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.1–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.0–61.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 49.9–74.2% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−34.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 45.9–73.2% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.8–65.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.3% · 90% range 49.8–76.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.1% · 90% range 48.5–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.2% · 90% range 43.1–71.4% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.2–71.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 40.3–66.1% · Record 3–3–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−15.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 53.3–79.7% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.9–69.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.4–70.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.6% · 90% range 42.0–71.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.1% · 90% range 51.8–78.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.2–66.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.4–75.2% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.2–69.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.4–66.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.3% · 90% range 46.8–73.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.5–76.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.6–66.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.7% · 90% range 46.2–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.1–73.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 71.5% · 90% range 59.0–83.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.4–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.5–69.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.4–75.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.0–68.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.5–72.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.6–71.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.8% · 90% range 35.8–63.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.3–64.5% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.5–75.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.6% · 90% range 50.1–77.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+12.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.1–73.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.8–70.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.9–65.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.5–72.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.4–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 43.4–69.3% · Record 6–4 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+24.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 50.9–77.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.3–68.3% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.2–70.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.3–75.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.4–72.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.1–65.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.0% · 90% range 45.3–72.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.6–64.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.6% · 90% range 48.3–74.9% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−31.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.7–65.3% · Record 4–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+2.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.5–70.5% · Record 0–3 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.3–78.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 66.5% · 90% range 52.8–80.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.5–67.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.7–70.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.6% · 90% range 34.9–62.3% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+11.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.7–66.0% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 55.0–80.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.6–73.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.2% · 90% range 48.7–75.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.2–64.1% · Record 0–0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.5–71.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.0% · 90% range 34.0–62.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.8% · 90% range 54.9–80.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 34.0–61.6% · Record 0–1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.2–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.6–74.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.3% · 90% range 43.5–71.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 44.3–71.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.2–66.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.4% · 90% range 50.0–76.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.8–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.5–73.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 41.8–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.7–73.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 40.7–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.6% · 90% range 51.1–78.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 51.0–77.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 62.8% · 90% range 49.4–76.1% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.7% · 90% range 44.9–72.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.7–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.3–67.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.9% · 90% range 46.2–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.5% · 90% range 44.5–72.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 43.1–70.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.1% · 90% range 50.7–77.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.7–71.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 42.9–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.7–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.8% · 90% range 50.4–77.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 63.1% · 90% range 49.0–77.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.1% · 90% range 42.2–70.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.8–73.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 46.1–73.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.3–67.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 34.9–63.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.8–70.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 48.2–75.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.1–66.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.0% · 90% range 31.0–59.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.2% · 90% range 50.7–77.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.8–71.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 65.6% · 90% range 51.9–79.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 64.4% · 90% range 51.0–77.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.5% · 90% range 47.9–75.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.3–69.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.5% · 90% range 45.7–73.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 61.9% · 90% range 48.1–75.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 45.4–73.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.3–74.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 67.2% · 90% range 53.8–80.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.4% · 90% range 46.3–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 43.1–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)