Win ratefew games47.1%Too few recent games (measured −30.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day)42.0–52.3 ·398 games
Adjusted for skillfew games47.4%, trend too few recent games (measured −27.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day)42.7–52.2 · average player
Vs the metafew games45.1%40.5–49.8 · sets the tier
Top cutsfew games0.86×0.48–1.24 · vs expected
Pilot rating1510about even vs their opponents
Share and win rate over time
Day by day. Bands show the likely range; faint dotted stretches have few games.
Meta share
0.00%range 0.00–0.07% · 72 entries
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 0.78% to 0.00%; low 0.00% (Nov 9), high 1.4% (Jul 31). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 3
0.92%
0.7–1.2%
31
Aug 10
0.47%
0.3–0.6%
41
Aug 17
0.48%
0.4–0.6%
48
Aug 24
0.61%
0.5–0.8%
60
Aug 31
0.18%
0.1–0.4%
62
Sep 7
0.12%
0.1–0.2%
65
Sep 14
0.10%
0.1–0.2%
67
Sep 21
0.12%
0.1–0.2%
69
Sep 28
0.11%
0.1–0.2%
70
Oct 5
0.03%
0.0–0.2%
70
Oct 12
0.07%
0.0–0.2%
71
Oct 19
0.11%
0.0–0.2%
72
Oct 26
0.07%
0.0–0.2%
72
Nov 2
0.01%
0.0–0.1%
72
Nov 9
0.00%
0.0–0.1%
72
Win rate
47.1%range 42.0–52.3% · 398 games
Win rate(band: likely range)Few gamesAdjusted for skill
Win rate by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 57.7% to 47.1%; low 47.1% (Oct 18), high 58.9% (Jul 31). Ruler of the Skies (B4) released Jul 30, 2026. Team Rocket's Ambition (B4a) released Aug 27, 2026. Deluxe Pack: Mega (B4b) released Sep 30, 2026. Dual Fusion (C1) released Oct 29, 2026.Show data (15 weeks of Win rate)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Win rate each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Win rate
90% range
games
Adjusted for skill
Aug 3
55.1%
48.6–61.5%
190
55.0%
Aug 10
51.8%
46.1–57.5%
249
53.2%
Aug 17
51.0%
45.6–56.4%
280
52.3%
Aug 24
51.1%
46.2–56.0%
348
51.2%
Aug 31
50.6%
45.7–55.5%
356
51.0%
Sep 7
49.8%
44.9–54.6%
367
50.3%
Sep 14
49.0%
44.1–53.8%
376
49.4%
Sep 21
50.0%
45.1–54.9%
387
49.9%
Sep 28
50.0%
45.0–54.9%
393
49.9%
Oct 5
50.0%
45.0–54.9%
393
49.9%
Oct 12
48.9%
43.9–53.9%
395
49.0%
Oct 19
47.1%
42.0–52.3%
398
47.4%
Oct 26
47.1%
42.0–52.3%
398
47.4%
Nov 2
47.1%
42.0–52.3%
398
47.4%
Nov 9
47.1%
42.0–52.3%
398
47.4%
Representative list
A typical recent list at its usual counts, grouped into core cards, flex choices and techs. Each share is of this deck's recent lists, as in Card usage.
How often each card is played in this deck's recent lists, with its trend arrow on the art, and how much it changes the deck's win rate against the meta.
Win rate against each opponent, with its likely range and the record. With few games the number leans on what the two decks' usual lists predict. All 101 opponents; hatched rows have few recent games.
Win rate 44.7% · 90% range 32.5–56.9% · Record 7–7 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−8.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 38.3% · 90% range 26.4–50.2% · Record 5–11 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−18.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 32.4% · 90% range 20.6–44.2% · Record 3–10 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 34.3–59.8% · Record 8–3 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.2% · 90% range 30.3–54.1% · Record 7–9 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+23.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 42.1–65.3% · Record 16–11–1 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Win rate 42.2% · 90% range 28.6–55.8% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−14.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.7% · 90% range 29.0–52.5% · Record 7–13 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−25.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 39.6% · 90% range 28.4–50.9% · Record 13–18–2 over 33 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−30.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 37.8% · 90% range 24.8–50.8% · Record 3–8 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−16.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.0% · 90% range 29.4–50.7% · Record 13–13–1 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
Steady (−15.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.4% · 90% range 28.8–55.9% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−24.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.8% · 90% range 32.2–59.3% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−20.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.3–63.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.9pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.9% · 90% range 28.9–54.9% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 36.6% · 90% range 23.4–49.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 30.9–57.2% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−24.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 37.3% · 90% range 24.0–50.6% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+13.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.6% · 90% range 30.6–56.6% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.8–65.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 37.2–64.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+16.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 41.2% · 90% range 27.9–54.5% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.9–66.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.8% · 90% range 29.9–57.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.5% · 90% range 28.6–56.4% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.1% · 90% range 30.8–57.4% · Record 5–3 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+21.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.7% · 90% range 34.9–62.4% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−9.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 35.9–64.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.5% · 90% range 38.2–66.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.5–63.2% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+3.1pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.2% · 90% range 28.4–56.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−19.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 32.9–60.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.1–64.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 40.0% · 90% range 26.7–53.3% · Record 0–5 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.0% · 90% range 29.1–56.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.9–68.7% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+18.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 42.8–71.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.1% · 90% range 33.2–61.0% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+17.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.6–66.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.3% · 90% range 29.5–57.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.0% · 90% range 30.1–57.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 34.0–61.2% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−24.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.9–64.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 42.5% · 90% range 28.7–56.3% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+26.5pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.0% · 90% range 34.6–63.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.5–67.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.9–68.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.3–64.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 36.7–65.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.9–70.8% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.1–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.6% · 90% range 35.6–63.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 60.6% · 90% range 46.8–74.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.1–70.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 33.6–61.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.1% · 90% range 34.9–63.2% · Record 1–0–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−1.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 39.8% · 90% range 26.9–52.8% · Record 2–2–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−5.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.3% · 90% range 33.6–61.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.2–63.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 39.9–67.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 37.9–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 43.1% · 90% range 29.2–56.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.6–68.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 36.8–65.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.2% · 90% range 34.0–62.4% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–67.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−7.3pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.2–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.7–64.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.6% · 90% range 33.8–61.5% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (−20.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.4% · 90% range 35.3–63.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.3–66.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 39.7–68.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.8% · 90% range 43.8–71.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.2–64.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 41.8–70.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.7% · 90% range 33.5–61.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 57.5% · 90% range 43.9–71.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 44.4–72.2% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+7.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 44.3% · 90% range 30.7–57.9% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (+0.8pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 49.3% · 90% range 35.3–63.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.2–66.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.3% · 90% range 34.4–62.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 39.8–68.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 35.7–64.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.5% · 90% range 33.2–61.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.3–68.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 42.8–71.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 46.9% · 90% range 31.8–62.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.5–68.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.0–65.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.4% · 90% range 33.3–61.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 48.1% · 90% range 33.7–62.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.8–64.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.7–65.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 35.8–64.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 47.8% · 90% range 33.6–62.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.4–67.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 40.9–69.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 45.7% · 90% range 31.5–59.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.1–65.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Steady (±0.0pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)