Meta share0.08%Steady (−44%, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)0.03–0.19% ·63 entries
Its win ratefew games46.3%Too few recent games (measured −6.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day)40.0–52.7 ·323 games
Top-cut sharefew games
Window
Games
120d
Best decks against Milotic ex Mega Sharpedo ex
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
No deck is clearly favored. 1 lean ahead, but each range reaches below 50%.
Cards that help against Milotic ex Mega Sharpedo ex
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Milotic ex Mega Sharpedo ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card has a measured effect against Milotic ex Mega Sharpedo ex yet. A deck needs 30+ games with decklists against it, and 10+ with and without the card.
Milotic ex Mega Sharpedo ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Jul 30 – Nov 9: 0.11% to 0.08%; low 0.05% (Oct 12), high 0.59% (Aug 5).Show data (15 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 3
0.34% (few)
0.2–0.5%
10
Aug 10
0.46%
0.3–0.6%
31
Aug 17
0.40%
0.3–0.5%
36
Aug 24
0.28%
0.2–0.4%
37
Aug 31
0.34%
0.2–0.6%
44
Sep 7
0.22%
0.1–0.4%
49
Sep 14
0.15%
0.1–0.2%
52
Sep 21
0.11%
0.1–0.2%
52
Sep 28
0.15%
0.1–0.3%
54
Oct 5
0.11%
0.0–0.3%
56
Oct 12
0.05%
0.0–0.2%
56
Oct 19
0.12%
0.1–0.3%
57
Oct 26
0.13%
0.1–0.3%
58
Nov 2
0.15%
0.1–0.3%
62
Nov 9
0.08%
0.0–0.2%
63
0.01%
0.00–0.27% ·11 entries0.60× expected (0.14–1.06)
Tier–No tier (too few games)vs meta 52.1% (47.4–56.8)
Mega Lucario exLucario(B3/A2)
Win rate vs it54.8%, trend steady (+9.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)42–67%range ·17–11–1
Share2.9%of field
24 possible counters with few games · above 50%, mostly on what the two decks' usual lists predict
Meta share0.08%Steady (−44%, now vs the last 4 weeks, within the noise)range 0.03–0.19% ·63 entries ·37 pilots
Share of top cuts0.01%range 0.00–0.27% ·11 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (steady: −44%, within the noise). Data through Nov 9, 2026.
57.1%
Win rate 57.1% · 90% range 44.0–70.2% · Record 7–5 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–5 · 12 games
57.4%
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 43.9–71.0% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–1 · 4 games
55.6%
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 42.7–68.6% · Record 2–3–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–3–1 · 6 games
55.2%
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 41.3–69.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.9%
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.2–68.6% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 40.4–65.9% · Record 11–8 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
11–8 · 19 games
54.5%
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.4–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.1%
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.0–68.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
53.0%
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.9–66.1% · Record 6–6 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–6 · 12 games
52.9%
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 39.8–66.1% · Record 6–1 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–1 · 7 games
53.4%
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.3–67.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.3%
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.8–65.8% · Record 5–6 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–6 · 11 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.8–66.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
50.8%
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 38.5–63.2% · Record 14–9 over 23 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
14–9 · 23 games
52.6%
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.4–66.7% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.4–65.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
51.6%
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 38.1–65.1% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–3 · 4 games
51.1%
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.8–64.4% · Record 9–6 over 15 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
9–6 · 15 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.8–65.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.8–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 37.8–66.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.3–64.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.6%
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.3–65.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Metalodon
#107 by share
Magnezone Miraidon ex (B1a/B3a)4.1% of field · few recent games · 2–2
Mega Manectric ex Heliolisk (B2b/B4)2.8% of field · few recent games · 7–5
Dedenne ex Indeedee ex0.75% of field · few recent games · 3–1
Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a)0.17% of field · few recent games · 2–3–1
Magnezone Helioliskrarely played · few recent games · 2–1
Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex4.4% of field · few recent games · 11–8
Pikachu ex Pawmot (C1)1.4% of field · few recent games · 2–0
Suicune ex Baxcalibur5.9% of field · few recent games · 6–6
Butterfree Mega Sceptile ex0.64% of field · few recent games · 6–1
Raikou ex Pawmot1.2% of field · few recent games · 1–0
Mega Sharpedo ex Chien-Pao ex0.08% of field · few recent games · 2–0
Vespiquen ex Shuckle ex2.7% of field · few recent games · 14–9
Milotic ex Eevee ex0.06% of field · few recent games · 2–1
Mega Altaria ex Espeon (B1/B3a)3.3% of field · few recent games · 9–6
Hydreigon Mega Sableye ex0.35% of field · few recent games · 1–0
Rotom ex Oricorio0.05% of field · few recent games · 1–0
Luxray Zeraorararely played · few recent games · 1–0
Alolan Exeggutor ex Cleffararely played · few recent games · 1–0
