How to beat Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2): counters and tech cards · Pokémon TCG Pocket
How to beat#10 by share
How to beat Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2)
Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2) is 2.9% of the field, so you meet it about one round in 34. It wins 51.0% of its games (range 49.8–52.2%, 10,886 games).
Its win rate51.0%Steady (+0.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)49.8–52.2 ·11k games
Top-cut share3.5%2.58–4.66% ·662 entries
Window
Games
120d
Best decks against Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2)
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
6 favored counters (whole range above 50%), 18 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
Cards that help against Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2)
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2), averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
The card numbers against Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2) are still being worked out. Reload the page in a few seconds.
Mega Lucario ex Lucario (B3/A2) in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 5.4% to 2.9%; low 1.3% (Nov 1), high 11% (Aug 18).Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
5.4%
4.8–6.0%
360
Jul 20
5.8%
5.2–6.4%
454
Jul 27
5.1%
4.5–5.8%
489
Aug 3
2.9%
2.4–3.6%
559
Aug 10
9.8%
9.0–10.6%
1,030
Aug 17
11%
10.3–11.8%
1,244
Aug 24
11%
10.3–12.0%
1,396
Aug 31
8.0%
7.0–9.1%
1,542
Sep 7
8.6%
7.8–9.4%
1,824
Sep 14
8.7%
8.1–9.4%
2,131
Sep 21
8.1%
7.4–8.7%
2,196
Sep 28
7.6%
6.9–8.3%
2,256
Oct 5
6.0%
5.0–7.1%
2,318
Oct 12
6.9%
6.0–8.0%
2,379
Oct 19
6.6%
5.8–7.5%
2,410
Oct 26
6.4%
5.5–7.5%
2,429
Nov 2
1.4%
1.0–1.9%
2,407
Nov 9
2.9%
2.4–3.5%
2,256
1.08× expected (1.00–1.16)
TierBTier Bvs meta 52.2% (49.6–54.8)
Mega Altaria exEspeon(B1/B3a)
Win rate vs it67.1%, trend steady (−6.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)64–71%range ·504–228–28
Meta share2.9%−47%range 2.41–3.52% ·2,256 entries ·742 pilots
Share of top cuts3.5%range 2.58–4.66% ·662 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (falling −47%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 9, 2026.
54.8%
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 49.6–60.1% · Record 171–135–16 over 322 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Mostly these games.
171–135–16 · 322 games
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 49.2–61.3% · Record 199–123–16 over 338 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Mostly these games.
199–123–16 · 338 games
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 48.7–63.0% · Record 62–50–1 over 113 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Mostly these games.
62–50–1 · 113 games
54.2%
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 48.1–60.3% · Record 159–141–14 over 314 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Mostly these games.
159–141–14 · 314 games
55.6%
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 45.8–65.3% · Record 27–21–2 over 50 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
27–21–2 · 50 games
55.8%
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 45.3–66.4% · Record 32–29–3 over 64 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
32–29–3 · 64 games
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 44.9–56.5% · Record 115–115–5 over 235 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Mostly these games.
115–115–5 · 235 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 44.8–60.5% · Record 65–54–4 over 123 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Mostly these games.
65–54–4 · 123 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 43.5–64.4% · Record 29–24–1 over 54 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
29–24–1 · 54 games
53.5%
Win rate 53.5% · 90% range 43.4–63.7% · Record 28–17 over 45 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
28–17 · 45 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 42.4–62.4% · Record 26–28–4 over 58 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
26–28–4 · 58 games
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 41.7–60.2% · Record 34–30–2 over 66 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
34–30–2 · 66 games
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 41.6–60.0% · Record 29–24–4 over 57 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
29–24–4 · 57 games
51.4%
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 41.3–61.4% · Record 37–38–4 over 79 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
37–38–4 · 79 games
51.6%
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 41.1–62.0% · Record 29–27–1 over 57 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
29–27–1 · 57 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 39.9–60.5% · Record 25–19–2 over 46 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
25–19–2 · 46 games
63.5%
Win rate 63.5% · 90% range 50.2–76.7% · Record 3–0–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0–1 · 4 games
59.8%
Win rate 59.8% · 90% range 48.0–71.6% · Record 8–11 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
8–11 · 19 games
61.4%
Win rate 61.4% · 90% range 47.9–75.0% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–2 · 4 games
61.8%
Win rate 61.8% · 90% range 47.8–75.8% · Record 5–4 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–4 · 9 games
60.2%
Win rate 60.2% · 90% range 46.5–73.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
58.9%
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.7–72.0% · Record 6–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–2 · 8 games
57.4%
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 45.7–69.1% · Record 15–8–1 over 24 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
15–8–1 · 24 games
58.9%
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.6–72.2% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–0 · 5 games
56.3%
Win rate 56.3% · 90% range 44.9–67.8% · Record 10–8 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
10–8 · 18 games
58.8%
Win rate 58.8% · 90% range 44.8–72.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
57.6%
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 43.9–71.4% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
56.8%
Win rate 56.8% · 90% range 43.6–70.1% · Record 5–3 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–3 · 8 games
56.0%
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 43.4–68.6% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–4 · 11 games
56.7%
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 43.0–70.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
55.9%
Win rate 55.9% · 90% range 42.6–69.2% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–2 · 7 games
56.5%
Win rate 56.5% · 90% range 42.4–70.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
54.1%
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 42.2–66.1% · Record 12–13–2 over 27 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
12–13–2 · 27 games
55.5%
Win rate 55.5% · 90% range 42.1–68.8% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–3 · 6 games
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 42.0–68.0% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–4 · 8 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 41.6–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.9%
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 40.8–64.9% · Record 19–7 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
19–7 · 26 games
54.1%
Win rate 54.1% · 90% range 40.3–68.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.2%
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.2–68.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.2–67.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
53.9%
Win rate 53.9% · 90% range 40.0–67.7% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 39.9–65.0% · Record 7–5 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–5 · 12 games
53.3%
Win rate 53.3% · 90% range 39.6–67.0% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–2 · 6 games
54.4%
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 39.6–69.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.4%
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.3–67.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 39.2–66.2% · Record 1–4 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–4 · 5 games
53.0%
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.1–66.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
50.7%
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 39.1–62.3% · Record 12–8 over 20 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
12–8 · 20 games
52.3%
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 39.0–65.6% · Record 1–5 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–5 · 6 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.9–66.5% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 38.8–61.9% · Record 15–10 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
15–10 · 25 games
51.2%
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 38.7–63.7% · Record 10–5–1 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
10–5–1 · 16 games
52.6%
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.6–66.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.6%
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.6–66.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.3%
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.3–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.3%
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.3–66.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.1–65.8% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.8–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.4%
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.7–65.0% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–2 · 6 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.7–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.7%
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 37.6–63.7% · Record 7–3 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–3 · 10 games
51.4%
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 37.6–65.2% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–3 · 6 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.5–65.4% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
50.6%
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 37.4–63.9% · Record 3–5 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–5 · 8 games
51.1%
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.4–64.8% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.1–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.4–64.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.6%
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 36.4–64.8% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.3–65.2% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.2–64.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.0–64.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
50.1%
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.0–64.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.7–64.7% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.6%
Win rate 50.6% · 90% range 35.1–66.1% · Record 6–12 over 18 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Metalodon
#10 by share
Mega Altaria ex Gourgeistrarely played · 22–9–1
Hydreigon Mega Absol ex1.5% of field · 171–135–16
Mega Charizard Y ex Entei ex8.5% of field · 199–123–16
Mega Sceptile ex Greninja2.5% of field · 159–141–14
Hydreigon Mega Sableye ex0.35% of field · 32–29–3
Mega Blaziken ex0.39% of field · 115–115–5
Zoroark ex Mega Absol ex0.27% of field · 65–54–4
Mega Gardevoir ex Mega Diancie ex0.20% of field · 26–28–4
Dragonair Altaria (B4/A4a)rarely played · 16–11–1
Mega Venusaur ex0.17% of field · 29–24–4
Beautifly Dustox (B4)0.06% of field · 37–38–4
Mega Lucario ex Greninja0.12% of field · 29–27–1
Mega Charizard X ex Mega Charizard Y ex0.04% of field · 25–19–2
Mega Diancie ex Mimikyu exrarely played · few recent games · 5–1
Iron Valiant Iron Boulderrarely played · few recent games · 3–0–1
Giratina ex Mega Mewtwo X ex0.41% of field · few recent games · 2–2
Gourgeist Galarian Cursolararely played · few recent games · 5–0
Mega Mewtwo X ex Mew ex3.5% of field · few recent games · 10–8
Giratina ex Dragonair3.5% of field · few recent games · 7–4
Team Rocket's Slowking ex Unownrarely played · few recent games · 0–1
Flutter Mane exrarely played · few recent games · 4–4
Hisuian Goodra0.04% of field · few recent games · 19–7
Espeon Igglybuffrarely played · few recent games · 1–0
Indeedee ex Gengar exrarely played · few recent games · 1–1
Mega Rayquaza ex Igglybuffrarely played · few recent games · 2–1
Espeon ex Giratina exrarely played · few recent games · 7–5
Iron Bundle ex Iron Valiantrarely played · few recent games · 1–1
Umbreon Hydreigon (C1/B1)5.4% of field · few recent games · 12–8
Mega Scizor ex Revavroomrarely played · few recent games · 15–10
Mewtwo ex Indeedee exrarely played · few recent games · 0–1
Mimikyu ex Greninja0.04% of field · few recent games · 4–2
Lunala ex Mega Diancie exrarely played · few recent games · 0–1
Mega Garchomp ex Dragonair0.18% of field · few recent games · 7–3
Dedenne ex Igglybuffrarely played · few recent games · 3–3
Hydreigon Absol (B1/B4)rarely played · few recent games · 3–5
Slurpuff Cherubirarely played · few recent games · 1–0
Wigglytuff ex Igglybuff0.14% of field · few recent games · 1–1
Fuecoco ex Charizard0.22% of field · few recent games · 0–2
Togekiss Meloetta (A4/B2)rarely played · few recent games · 1–1
Togekiss Meloetta (A2/B2)rarely played · few recent games · 0–1
