Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
No deck is clearly favored. 3 lean ahead, but each range reaches below 50%.
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Mega Lucario ex Greninja, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Mega Lucario ex Greninja yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
10 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Mega Lucario ex Greninja in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share by day, Jul 15 – Nov 11: 0.97% to 0.13%; low 0.09% (Sep 27), high 1.2% (Jul 27).Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 15
0.97%
0.8–1.2%
328
Jul 22
0.91%
0.7–1.1%
335
Jul 29
1.2%
1.0–1.5%
351
Aug 5
0.92%
0.7–1.2%
384
Aug 12
0.79%
0.6–1.0%
405
Aug 19
0.78%
0.6–1.0%
415
Aug 26
0.74%
0.6–1.0%
424
Sep 2
0.23%
0.1–0.4%
427
Sep 9
0.25%
0.2–0.4%
432
Sep 16
0.17%
0.1–0.3%
435
Sep 23
0.12%
0.1–0.2%
435
Sep 30
0.82%
0.6–1.2%
445
Oct 7
0.57%
0.4–0.9%
370
Oct 14
0.34%
0.2–0.5%
203
Oct 21
0.42%
0.3–0.6%
179
Oct 28
0.55%
0.4–0.8%
175
Nov 4
0.16%
0.1–0.3%
161
Nov 11
0.13%
0.1–0.2%
141
Tier
DTier D
vs meta 49.0% (44.7–53.4)
DragonairMega Rayquaza ex(B4)
Win rate vs it53.8%, trend steady (+8.7pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)44–64%range ·28–26–1
Pokémon Center Lady1 deck · 29 games with · in 71% of their lists
+2.8pp
+2.8pp · 90% range −12.1pp to +16.8pp · 29 games · could be zero
Drampa1 deck · 15 games with · in 24% of their lists
+4.2pp
+4.2pp · 90% range −12.1pp to +19.0pp · 15 games · could be zero
Sabrina1 deck · 20 games with · in 71% of their lists
+1.7pp
+1.7pp · 90% range −13.5pp to +16.0pp · 20 games · could be zero
Field Blower1 deck · 12 games with · in 11% of their lists
+1.9pp
+1.9pp · 90% range −14.0pp to +16.8pp · 12 games · could be zero
Small Balloon1 deck · 31 games with · in 48% of their lists
+0.8pp
+0.8pp · 90% range −14.1pp to +15.1pp · 31 games · could be zero
Ancient Booster Energy Capsule1 deck · 31 games with · in 45% of their lists
+0.8pp
+0.8pp · 90% range −14.9pp to +15.7pp · 31 games · could be zero
Professor Sada1 deck · 33 games with · in 53% of their lists
+1.0pp
+1.0pp · 90% range −15.0pp to +16.2pp · 33 games · could be zero
Dratini1 deck · 33 games with · in 33% of their lists
±0.0pp
±0.0pp · 90% range −15.9pp to +15.3pp · 33 games · could be zero
Protective Poncho1 deck · 17 games with · in 18% of their lists
−1.4pp
−1.4pp · 90% range −16.5pp to +13.4pp · 17 games · could be zero
Gouging Fire1 deck · 43 games with · in 60% of their lists
−5.1pp
−5.1pp · 90% range −21.1pp to +11.4pp · 43 games · could be zero
Meta share0.13%−55%range 0.07–0.25% ·141 entries ·84 pilots
Share of top cuts0.04%range 0.01–0.28% ·39 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (falling −55%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 11, 2026.
58.1%
Win rate 58.1% · 90% range 46.6–69.5% · Record 18–19 over 37 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
18–19 · 37 games
59.3%
Win rate 59.3% · 90% range 46.3–72.4% · Record 5–1 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–1 · 6 games
57.4%
Win rate 57.4% · 90% range 44.2–70.5% · Record 5–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–2 · 7 games
55.6%
Win rate 55.6% · 90% range 43.5–67.7% · Record 13–11–2 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
13–11–2 · 26 games
56.7%
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.4–70.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
55.7%
Win rate 55.7% · 90% range 42.3–69.0% · Record 4–0–1 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–0–1 · 5 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 42.3–68.6% · Record 1–4–2 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–4–2 · 7 games
55.2%
Win rate 55.2% · 90% range 42.0–68.5% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–2 · 6 games
55.8%
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 41.9–69.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.9%
Win rate 54.9% · 90% range 41.9–68.0% · Record 6–5 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–5 · 11 games
55.1%
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.6–68.5% · Record 5–4–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–4–1 · 10 games
54.4%
Win rate 54.4% · 90% range 41.6–67.2% · Record 6–2 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–2 · 8 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 41.5–66.6% · Record 8–4–2 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
8–4–2 · 14 games
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.9–67.8% · Record 1–2–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2–1 · 4 games
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.6–68.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.3–68.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 40.0–64.8% · Record 12–12–2 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
12–12–2 · 26 games
53.7%
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 39.9–67.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.6%
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 39.8–63.3% · Record 20–15–3 over 38 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
20–15–3 · 38 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 39.8–64.0% · Record 9–10 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
9–10 · 19 games
53.4%
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 39.5–67.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
53.6%
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.4–67.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.3–67.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.9%
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 39.2–66.6% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
52.2%
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 39.1–65.3% · Record 9–4–1 over 14 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
9–4–1 · 14 games
Win rate 51.4% · 90% range 39.0–63.9% · Record 7–6 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–6 · 13 games
53.0%
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 38.9–67.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.6–66.3% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 38.5–65.4% · Record 2–7 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–7 · 9 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.4–66.3% · Record 0–2 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–2 · 2 games
52.3%
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.0–66.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.0–66.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.7–65.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
50.5%
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 37.7–63.3% · Record 6–5–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–5–1 · 12 games
51.1%
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.5–64.8% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–4 · 6 games
50.9%
Win rate 50.9% · 90% range 37.3–64.6% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–3 · 5 games
51.1%
Win rate 51.1% · 90% range 37.0–65.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.0%
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.0–64.9% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.9–64.0% · Record 0–4 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–4 · 4 games
51.0%
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 36.9–65.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.2%
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 36.9–65.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.5–64.1% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–4 · 6 games
50.5%
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.4–64.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 36.3–64.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.0%
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 35.9–64.1% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 35.8–64.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.