How to beat Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a): counters and tech cards · Pokémon TCG Pocket
How to beat#58 by share
How to beat Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a)
Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a) is 0.20% of the field, so you meet it about one round in 504. It wins 50.1% of its games (range 47.7–52.6%, 1,834 games).
Its win rate50.1%Steady (−5.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)47.7–52.6 ·1.8k games
Top-cut share0.11%0.03–0.39% ·98 entries
Window
Games
120d
Best decks against Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a)
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
2 favored counters (whole range above 50%), 9 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
Cards that help against Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a)
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a), averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a) yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
Top 24 of 40 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a) in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share by day, Jul 15 – Nov 11: 0.79% to 0.20%; low 0.15% (Nov 10), high 3.0% (Aug 29).Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 15
0.79%
0.6–1.0%
269
Jul 22
0.84%
0.7–1.0%
279
Jul 29
0.68%
0.5–0.9%
282
Aug 5
0.72%
0.5–1.0%
307
Aug 12
1.5%
1.3–1.8%
379
Aug 19
1.6%
1.3–1.8%
399
Aug 26
1.8%
1.6–2.1%
430
Sep 2
2.3%
1.9–2.8%
491
Sep 9
1.5%
1.2–1.7%
524
Sep 16
1.3%
1.1–1.5%
553
Sep 23
1.3%
1.1–1.6%
568
Sep 30
1.0%
0.7–1.4%
579
Oct 7
0.92%
0.7–1.3%
504
Oct 14
1.0%
0.8–1.3%
427
Oct 21
0.81%
0.6–1.1%
390
Oct 28
0.90%
0.6–1.2%
371
Nov 4
0.25%
0.1–0.4%
365
Nov 11
0.20%
0.1–0.3%
350
0.97× expected (0.79–1.15)
TierCTier Cvs meta 52.3% (48.9–55.8)
Mega Lucario exLucario(B3/A2)
Win rate vs it58.3%, trend steady (−2.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)51–66%range ·99–67–3
Small Balloon4 decks · 183 games with · in 55% of their lists
+3.1pp
+3.1pp · 90% range −4.1pp to +10.3pp · 183 games · could be zero
Pokémon Center Lady5 decks · 323 games with · in 64% of their lists
+1.5pp
+1.5pp · 90% range −4.9pp to +7.9pp · 323 games · could be zero
Hitmontop1 deck · 58 games with · in 12% of their lists
+7.3pp
+7.3pp · 90% range −5.9pp to +18.6pp · 58 games · could be zero
Sabrina5 decks · 200 games with · in 61% of their lists
+0.1pp
+0.1pp · 90% range −6.3pp to +6.6pp · 200 games · could be zero
Mars2 decks · 59 games with · in 74% of their lists
+3.3pp
+3.3pp · 90% range −6.4pp to +13.1pp · 59 games · could be zero
X Speed2 decks · 75 games with · in 70% of their lists
+4.9pp
+4.9pp · 90% range −6.4pp to +16.2pp · 75 games · could be zero
Lucky Ice Pop3 decks · 137 games with · in 41% of their lists
+2.2pp
+2.2pp · 90% range −6.6pp to +10.9pp · 137 games · could be zero
Pheromosa1 deck · 35 games with · in 3% of their lists
+3.9pp
+3.9pp · 90% range −8.3pp to +18.9pp · 35 games · could be zero
Field Blower5 decks · 307 games with · in 54% of their lists
−1.1pp
−1.1pp · 90% range −8.5pp to +6.3pp · 307 games · could be zero
Dratini B4 1161 deck · 31 games with · in 43% of their lists
+5.1pp
+5.1pp · 90% range −9.8pp to +17.9pp · 31 games · could be zero
Zeraora1 deck · 28 games with · in 28% of their lists
+6.9pp
+6.9pp · 90% range −9.8pp to +21.2pp · 28 games · could be zero
Erika1 deck · 39 games with · in 5% of their lists
+1.0pp
+1.0pp · 90% range −9.9pp to +14.9pp · 39 games · could be zero
Sawk1 deck · 49 games with · in 11% of their lists
+3.6pp
+3.6pp · 90% range −10.1pp to +15.9pp · 49 games · could be zero
Combee B4 101 deck · 86 games with · in 89% of their lists
−0.6pp
−0.6pp · 90% range −10.2pp to +11.5pp · 86 games · could be zero
Combee A2 171 deck · 13 games with · in 1% of their lists
+0.7pp
+0.7pp · 90% range −10.7pp to +15.5pp · 13 games · could be zero
Cyrus2 decks · 117 games with · in 29% of their lists
−1.0pp
−1.0pp · 90% range −10.8pp to +8.8pp · 117 games · could be zero
Riolu B3 791 deck · 113 games with · in 77% of their lists
+3.3pp
+3.3pp · 90% range −11.0pp to +16.0pp · 113 games · could be zero
Vespiquen1 deck · 14 games with · in 12% of their lists
−1.0pp
−1.0pp · 90% range −11.5pp to +12.8pp · 14 games · could be zero
Lisia1 deck · 24 games with · in 8% of their lists
+2.6pp
+2.6pp · 90% range −11.8pp to +16.2pp · 24 games · could be zero
Oricorio1 deck · 53 games with · in 80% of their lists
+4.9pp
+4.9pp · 90% range −12.3pp to +20.1pp · 53 games · could be zero
Hitmonlee1 deck · 88 games with · in 76% of their lists
+1.0pp
+1.0pp · 90% range −12.3pp to +13.3pp · 88 games · could be zero
Protective Poncho2 decks · 136 games with · in 31% of their lists
−1.2pp
−1.2pp · 90% range −12.4pp to +10.0pp · 136 games · could be zero
Kartana1 deck · 28 games with · in 2% of their lists
−3.1pp
−3.1pp · 90% range −13.2pp to +10.7pp · 28 games · could be zero
Training Area1 deck · 27 games with · in 92% of their lists
+1.5pp
+1.5pp · 90% range −13.6pp to +13.8pp · 27 games · could be zero
Meta share0.20%−73%range 0.12–0.33% ·350 entries ·176 pilots
Share of top cuts0.11%range 0.03–0.39% ·98 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (falling −73%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 11, 2026.
51.6%
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 41.5–61.7% · Record 27–32–1 over 60 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
27–32–1 · 60 games
50.7%
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 41.1–60.3% · Record 36–20–1 over 57 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
36–20–1 · 57 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 40.9–63.1% · Record 20–14–1 over 35 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
20–14–1 · 35 games
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 39.6–61.5% · Record 24–20–2 over 46 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
24–20–2 · 46 games
Win rate 57.7% · 90% range 44.7–70.7% · Record 6–4 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
6–4 · 10 games
56.7%
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 42.8–70.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
56.2%
Win rate 56.2% · 90% range 42.0–70.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
55.0%
Win rate 55.0% · 90% range 41.8–68.1% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–4 · 11 games
55.1%
Win rate 55.1% · 90% range 41.0–69.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 40.4–64.9% · Record 13–12–1 over 26 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
13–12–1 · 26 games
53.6%
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.8–67.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
52.9%
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 39.5–66.3% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–4 · 6 games
53.6%
Win rate 53.6% · 90% range 39.5–67.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
52.3%
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 39.5–65.1% · Record 7–0 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–0 · 7 games
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 39.4–65.1% · Record 9–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
9–1 · 10 games
53.0%
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 39.3–66.7% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
52.1%
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.6–65.6% · Record 2–5 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–5 · 7 games
52.6%
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.6–66.6% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
52.1%
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.3–65.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
52.2%
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.3–66.2% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.3%
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.2–66.5% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 38.1–65.8% · Record 1–1–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1–1 · 3 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.7–65.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.9%
Win rate 51.9% · 90% range 37.7–66.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.6–65.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.7%
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.9–64.4% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.7–64.1% · Record 2–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–1 · 3 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.1–64.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.