Its win rate55.3%Steady (+0.6pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)53.7–56.9 ·6.4k games
Top-cut share6.7%5.47–8.08% ·413 entries
Window
Games
120d
Best decks against Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex
Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
7 favored counters (whole range above 50%), 5 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
The card numbers against Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex are still being worked out. Reload the page in a few seconds.
Hoopa ex Mega Absol ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share(band: likely range)Few entries
Meta share by day, Aug 1 – Nov 11: 0.43% to 4.4%; low 0.43% (Aug 1), high 7.1% (Aug 11).Show data (15 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Aug 5
4.2%
3.5–5.0%
138
Aug 12
6.5%
5.9–7.2%
435
Aug 19
6.0%
5.4–6.7%
491
Aug 26
5.4%
4.7–6.1%
551
Sep 2
2.4%
1.9–3.1%
597
Sep 9
2.2%
1.8–2.7%
644
Sep 16
2.4%
2.0–2.8%
714
Sep 23
3.1%
2.7–3.6%
762
Sep 30
4.4%
3.5–5.5%
823
Oct 7
5.0%
4.1–6.2%
894
Oct 14
4.1%
3.5–4.9%
937
Oct 21
4.7%
4.0–5.7%
971
Oct 28
5.3%
4.4–6.4%
1,005
Nov 4
3.8%
3.1–4.6%
1,103
Nov 11
4.4%
3.8–5.2%
1,189
1.34× expected (1.23–1.45)
TierSTier Svs meta 56.0% (53.8–58.1)
Vespiquen exShuckle ex
Win rate vs it68.8%, trend steady (−2.2pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)64–74%range ·273–95–14
Meta share4.4%+10%range 3.80–5.17% ·1,189 entries ·478 pilots
Share of top cuts6.7%range 5.47–8.08% ·413 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (rising +10%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 11, 2026.
53.7%
Win rate 53.7% · 90% range 47.7–59.6% · Record 142–107–11 over 260 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Mostly these games.
142–107–11 · 260 games
53.0%
Win rate 53.0% · 90% range 43.2–62.9% · Record 28–33 over 61 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
28–33 · 61 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 41.6–62.0% · Record 23–15 over 38 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
23–15 · 38 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 40.9–63.9% · Record 19–16–2 over 37 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Leans on the prediction.
19–16–2 · 37 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 40.1–63.3% · Record 15–9–1 over 25 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Part games, part prediction.
15–9–1 · 25 games
62.0%
Win rate 62.0% · 90% range 48.4–75.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
58.3%
Win rate 58.3% · 90% range 45.7–70.9% · Record 7–4 over 11 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–4 · 11 games
58.9%
Win rate 58.9% · 90% range 45.7–72.1% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0 · 3 games
58.4%
Win rate 58.4% · 90% range 44.9–71.9% · Record 4–2 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–2 · 6 games
Win rate 57.6% · 90% range 44.2–71.0% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–1 · 4 games
Win rate 58.0% · 90% range 44.0–72.0% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
56.7%
Win rate 56.7% · 90% range 43.2–70.3% · Record 5–0 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–0 · 5 games
56.9%
Win rate 56.9% · 90% range 43.2–70.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
54.8%
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.1–68.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 40.4–66.0% · Record 7–2–1 over 10 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–2–1 · 10 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 40.2–66.2% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–5 · 9 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.1–67.9% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
53.2%
Win rate 53.2% · 90% range 39.4–67.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 39.1–63.9% · Record 10–10–1 over 21 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
10–10–1 · 21 games
52.6%
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.8–66.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.3%
Win rate 50.3% · 90% range 38.7–61.9% · Record 14–11–3 over 28 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
14–11–3 · 28 games
52.7%
Win rate 52.7% · 90% range 38.6–66.8% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.6%
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.5–66.7% · Record 2–4 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–4 · 6 games
52.3%
Win rate 52.3% · 90% range 38.3–66.3% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.2%
Win rate 52.2% · 90% range 38.2–66.2% · Record 4–0 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–0 · 4 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.7–65.9% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–0 · 3 games
51.7%
Win rate 51.7% · 90% range 37.6–65.8% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.2%
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.2–65.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.2%
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.0–65.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.0%
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.0–65.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.0%
Win rate 51.0% · 90% range 37.0–64.9% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
50.8%
Win rate 50.8% · 90% range 36.9–64.7% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–2 · 5 games
51.6%
Win rate 51.6% · 90% range 36.6–66.7% · Record 3–0 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.