Decks that win more than half their games against it, the best-proven first. "Favored" means even the low end of the range is above 50%. Matchups with few recent games are listed separately.
1 favored counter (whole range above 50%), 5 leaning (above 50%, but the range reaches below).
How many points running the card adds to a deck's win rate against Greninja Mega Sableye ex, averaged over the decks that play it into this matchup and allowing for pilot skill. The surest come first.
No card clearly helps against Greninja Mega Sableye ex yet, since each card’s range reaches zero. The closest calls are below.
5 cards · the range includes zero, so these could be noise
Greninja Mega Sableye ex in the meta
How often you can expect to face it, day by day (band: likely range).
Meta share by day, Jul 13 – Nov 9: 5.2% to 0.01%; low 0.01% (Oct 12), high 5.8% (Jul 20).Show data (18 weeks of Meta share)
One row a week, ending with the latest day.
Meta share each week (every 7th day, ending with the latest): value, 90% range and sample size
Data through
Meta share
90% range
entries
Jul 13
5.2%
4.8–5.7%
379
Jul 20
5.8%
5.3–6.3%
471
Jul 27
5.4%
5.0–6.0%
517
Aug 3
1.1%
0.8–1.4%
531
Aug 10
0.45%
0.3–0.6%
538
Aug 17
0.62%
0.5–0.8%
539
Aug 24
0.42%
0.3–0.6%
540
Aug 31
0.09%
0.0–0.2%
540
Sep 7
0.08%
0.0–0.2%
542
Sep 14
0.07%
0.0–0.1%
543
Sep 21
0.05%
0.0–0.1%
543
Sep 28
0.07%
0.0–0.2%
544
Oct 5
0.02%
0.0–0.2%
544
Oct 12
0.01%
0.0–0.1%
544
Oct 19
0.01%
0.0–0.1%
544
Oct 26
0.01%
0.0–0.1%
544
Nov 2
0.03%
0.0–0.2%
348
Nov 9
0.01%
0.0–0.1%
175
TierDTier Dvs meta 49.1% (45.0–53.3)
Suicune exBaxcalibur
Win rate vs it60.6%, trend steady (+31.4pp, 7-day vs 28-day, within the noise)52–69%range ·42–25–2
Sawk1 deck · 29 games with · in 12% of their lists
+4.6pp
+4.6pp · 90% range −10.6pp to +20.2pp · 29 games · could be zero
Field Blower2 decks · 70 games with · in 15% of their lists
−1.4pp
−1.4pp · 90% range −12.4pp to +9.6pp · 70 games · could be zero
Hiking Trail1 deck · 25 games with · in 37% of their lists
+1.4pp
+1.4pp · 90% range −14.7pp to +15.9pp · 25 games · could be zero
Starting Plains1 deck · 42 games with · in 2% of their lists
+0.8pp
+0.8pp · 90% range −14.9pp to +14.0pp · 42 games · could be zero
Cyrus1 deck · 23 games with · in 12% of their lists
−3.6pp
−3.6pp · 90% range −19.5pp to +10.4pp · 23 games · could be zero
Meta share0.01%−90%range 0.00–0.09% ·175 entries ·89 pilots
Share of top cuts0.00%range 0.00–0.25% ·35 entries
Share trend vs the last 4 weeks (falling −90%, beyond the noise). Data through Nov 9, 2026.
60.8%
Win rate 60.8% · 90% range 49.3–72.2% · Record 13–3 over 16 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
13–3 · 16 games
59.6%
Win rate 59.6% · 90% range 48.3–71.0% · Record 15–3–1 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
15–3–1 · 19 games
59.2%
Win rate 59.2% · 90% range 46.2–72.2% · Record 16–3 over 19 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
16–3 · 19 games
57.0%
Win rate 57.0% · 90% range 43.3–70.6% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–1 · 4 games
56.0%
Win rate 56.0% · 90% range 42.8–69.1% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–3 · 7 games
56.4%
Win rate 56.4% · 90% range 42.6–70.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
55.4%
Win rate 55.4% · 90% range 42.3–68.5% · Record 4–3 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–3 · 7 games
55.8%
Win rate 55.8% · 90% range 42.0–69.7% · Record 2–3 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–3 · 5 games
55.3%
Win rate 55.3% · 90% range 41.6–69.0% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
54.5%
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 41.4–67.6% · Record 4–5 over 9 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–5 · 9 games
54.2%
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 41.2–67.1% · Record 5–2–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–2–1 · 8 games
54.8%
Win rate 54.8% · 90% range 41.0–68.7% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
54.5%
Win rate 54.5% · 90% range 40.7–68.3% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
54.0%
Win rate 54.0% · 90% range 40.5–67.5% · Record 3–2 over 5 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–2 · 5 games
54.3%
Win rate 54.3% · 90% range 40.4–68.2% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.4%
Win rate 53.4% · 90% range 40.4–66.4% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–3 · 6 games
53.1%
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 40.4–65.9% · Record 7–1 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
7–1 · 8 games
54.2%
Win rate 54.2% · 90% range 40.3–68.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
53.1%
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 40.1–66.1% · Record 4–4 over 8 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
4–4 · 8 games
53.1%
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 40.1–66.1% · Record 3–4 over 7 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–4 · 7 games
53.1%
Win rate 53.1% · 90% range 39.1–67.0% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
51.3%
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 39.0–63.5% · Record 5–6–1 over 12 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
5–6–1 · 12 games
51.3%
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 39.0–63.7% · Record 8–5 over 13 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
8–5 · 13 games
52.4%
Win rate 52.4% · 90% range 38.6–66.1% · Record 3–1 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–1 · 4 games
52.9%
Win rate 52.9% · 90% range 38.6–67.1% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
52.1%
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.5–65.8% · Record 1–3 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–3 · 4 games
52.0%
Win rate 52.0% · 90% range 38.5–65.5% · Record 2–2 over 4 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–2 · 4 games
52.6%
Win rate 52.6% · 90% range 38.3–66.9% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
52.1%
Win rate 52.1% · 90% range 38.2–66.1% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.8%
Win rate 51.8% · 90% range 37.9–65.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.5–65.5% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.5%
Win rate 51.5% · 90% range 37.4–65.6% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–0 · 1 games
51.2%
Win rate 51.2% · 90% range 37.3–65.0% · Record 1–1 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–1 · 2 games
51.3%
Win rate 51.3% · 90% range 37.1–65.5% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.0%
Win rate 50.0% · 90% range 36.9–63.1% · Record 3–3 over 6 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
3–3 · 6 games
50.7%
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.8–64.6% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
50.5%
Win rate 50.5% · 90% range 36.8–64.2% · Record 1–2 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
1–2 · 3 games
50.7%
Win rate 50.7% · 90% range 36.7–64.6% · Record 0–1 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
0–1 · 1 games
50.4%
Win rate 50.4% · 90% range 36.5–64.3% · Record 2–0–1 over 3 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0–1 · 3 games
50.1%
Win rate 50.1% · 90% range 36.1–64.1% · Record 2–0 over 2 games, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
2–0 · 2 games
50.2%
Win rate 50.2% · 90% range 36.0–64.4% · Record 1–0 over 1 game, blended with what the two decks' usual lists predict. Few games so far, so mostly the prediction.
Metalodon
Vespiquen ex Shuckle ex2.7% of field · few recent games · 7–0
Greninja Mega Absol ex0.05% of field · few recent games · 13–3
Zoroark ex Mega Absol ex0.27% of field · few recent games · 15–3–1
Butterfree Mega Sceptile ex0.64% of field · few recent games · 16–3
Mega Sharpedo ex Gyarados0.14% of field · few recent games · 3–1
Mega Manectric ex Heliolisk (B2b/B4)2.8% of field · few recent games · 4–3
Hoopa ex Mega Sableye ex0.40% of field · few recent games · 1–0
Magnezone ex Magnezone (B3/B1a)0.17% of field · few recent games · 4–3
Mega Lucario ex Igglybuff0.04% of field · few recent games · 5–2–1
Milotic ex Mega Sharpedo ex0.08% of field · few recent games · 1–0
Greninja Oricorio0.06% of field · few recent games · 0–1
Beautifly Dustox (B4)0.06% of field · few recent games · 1–0
Mega Altaria ex Greninja2.9% of field · few recent games · 3–3
Giratina ex Darkrai ex0.15% of field · few recent games · 7–1
Dedenne ex Igglybuffrarely played · few recent games · 4–4
Meowscarada ex Meowscarada0.12% of field · few recent games · 3–4
Indeedee ex Giratina exrarely played · few recent games · 8–5
Pikachu ex Dedenne ex (A2b/B3b)rarely played · few recent games · 1–0
Pikachu ex Pichu0.17% of field · few recent games · 0–1
Miraidon ex Magnezone (A2/B3a)rarely played · few recent games · 1–1
Buzzwole ex Celesteela0.06% of field · few recent games · 1–0
Tapu Koko ex Pikachu exrarely played · few recent games · 1–0
Jumpluff ex Teal Mask Ogerpon exrarely played · few recent games · 0–1
Leafeon ex Teal Mask Ogerpon exrarely played · few recent games · 1–0
Field Blower2 decks · 70 games with · in 15% of their lists
Hiking Trail1 deck · 25 games with · in 37% of their lists
Starting Plains1 deck · 42 games with · in 2% of their lists
Cyrus1 deck · 23 games with · in 12% of their lists
